Titanium modular stems in total hip arthroplasty due to developmental dysplasia: a registry comparison with single-taper implants.
Aseptic loosening
corrosion
dislocation
dual taper
exchangeable neck
failure
Journal
Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy
ISSN: 1724-6067
Titre abrégé: Hip Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9200413
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
medline:
8
9
2023
pubmed:
22
9
2022
entrez:
21
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The routine use of proximal femoral modularity was discouraged in total hip arthroplasties (THAs). However, titanium dual-taper (DT) implants may provide some advantages over single-taper (ST) stems in cases of complex deformity. A registry study comparing ST and DT stems in dysplasia was designed, aiming to assess: (1) survival rates at long-term; (2) reasons for revision; (3) the profile of failed implants. The arthroplasty registry RIPO was investigated for cementless THAs performed for dysplasia since 2000. ST implants were compared to titanium-on-titanium DT stems. Demographics and implant features were collected. Survival rates and reasons for revision were compared. The profile of DT stem failures in dysplasia was defined. 6429 implants were included in the study, 3642 ST and 2787 DT. The demographic and implant features of the 2 cohorts were not comparable. The DT cohort achieved higher survival rates at long-term (93.9% vs. 91.6%, Modularity did not result in lower survival rates in dysplastic patients and may even reduce the rate of aseptic loosening in comparison to ST stems. The rate of implant breakage is not negligible. Younger males are not good candidates for titanium DT stems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36127850
doi: 10.1177/11207000221124115
pmc: PMC10486160
doi:
Substances chimiques
Titanium
D1JT611TNE
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
916-924Références
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Feb;36(2):630-635
pubmed: 32919844
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Oct;30(10):1747-51
pubmed: 25980775
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Nov 25;18(1):491
pubmed: 29178854
Int Orthop. 2017 Mar;41(3):635-644
pubmed: 27999925
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Dec;28(10):1741-5
pubmed: 23706812
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jan;24(1):27-32
pubmed: 18977633
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Aug;475(8):2046-2059
pubmed: 28194710
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Apr;20(4):214-22
pubmed: 22474091
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jul;470(7):1885-94
pubmed: 22048865
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jul;32(7):2301-2306
pubmed: 28262451
Int Orthop. 2020 Nov;44(11):2261-2266
pubmed: 32601721
J Orthop Sci. 2011 Jan;16(1):14-20
pubmed: 21258951
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Nov 13;14(1):362
pubmed: 31722721
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jun;33(6):1813-1819
pubmed: 29500091
Arthroplast Today. 2017 Nov 27;4(3):363-369
pubmed: 30186923
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Jun;92(6):770-6
pubmed: 20513871
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jun;99-B(6):766-773
pubmed: 28566395
J Orthop Traumatol. 2021 Jul 18;22(1):29
pubmed: 34275012
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1211-1219
pubmed: 27923597
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Aug;32(8):2450-2456
pubmed: 28479057
Bone Joint J. 2014 Nov;96-B(11):1449-54
pubmed: 25371455
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Mar 16;93(6):548-55
pubmed: 21411705