Unruptured aneurysm at bifurcation of super short middle cerebral artery mimicking duplicated middle cerebral artery aneurysm.

Aneurysm Clipping Duplicated middle cerebral artery Short middle cerebral artery

Journal

Surgical neurology international
ISSN: 2229-5097
Titre abrégé: Surg Neurol Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101535836

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 07 07 2022
accepted: 20 07 2022
entrez: 21 9 2022
pubmed: 22 9 2022
medline: 22 9 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Duplicated middle cerebral artery (DMCA) is a normal variation of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), and distinguishing DMCA from other arteries based only on the angiographical findings is sometimes difficult. Preoperative angiography of a 60-year-old woman revealed two MCAs originating near the top of the right internal carotid artery and a 6-mm-sized aneurysm located between these two MCAs. The ipsilateral A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery was not visualized due to hypoplasia. The patient was diagnosed with an unruptured aneurysm at the bifurcation between MCA and DMCA, preoperatively. However, during clipping surgery, the hypoplastic A1 segment was observed at approximately 2 mm proximal to the bifurcation of the MCA, indicating that these two MCAs were not "true" MCA and DMCA, but rather two normal MCA trunks bifurcated from the very short prebifurcation segment of M1. This difference in interpretation was due to the fact that the hypoplastic A1 was not visualized on preoperative examinations. The patient was discharged following the surgery without any neurological deficits. The distinction between DMCA and MCA trunks from the very short prebifurcation segment of MCA might be difficult, especially when the ipsilateral A1 segment is hypoplastic. Such an M1 with a length of 2-3 mm might be named super short M1. Thus, it is necessary to confirm the anatomy during aneurysm surgery.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Duplicated middle cerebral artery (DMCA) is a normal variation of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), and distinguishing DMCA from other arteries based only on the angiographical findings is sometimes difficult.
Case Description UNASSIGNED
Preoperative angiography of a 60-year-old woman revealed two MCAs originating near the top of the right internal carotid artery and a 6-mm-sized aneurysm located between these two MCAs. The ipsilateral A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery was not visualized due to hypoplasia. The patient was diagnosed with an unruptured aneurysm at the bifurcation between MCA and DMCA, preoperatively. However, during clipping surgery, the hypoplastic A1 segment was observed at approximately 2 mm proximal to the bifurcation of the MCA, indicating that these two MCAs were not "true" MCA and DMCA, but rather two normal MCA trunks bifurcated from the very short prebifurcation segment of M1. This difference in interpretation was due to the fact that the hypoplastic A1 was not visualized on preoperative examinations. The patient was discharged following the surgery without any neurological deficits.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
The distinction between DMCA and MCA trunks from the very short prebifurcation segment of MCA might be difficult, especially when the ipsilateral A1 segment is hypoplastic. Such an M1 with a length of 2-3 mm might be named super short M1. Thus, it is necessary to confirm the anatomy during aneurysm surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36128107
doi: 10.25259/SNI_607_2022
pii: 10.25259/SNI_607_2022
pmc: PMC9479551
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

329

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Surgical Neurology International.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

There are no conflicts of interest.

Références

Neurosurgery. 2001 Apr;48(4):780-5; discussion 785-6
pubmed: 11322438
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Jul;30(7):105773
pubmed: 33865230
Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1973 Jul;118(3):567-75
pubmed: 4723180
J Neurosurg. 1981 Feb;54(2):151-69
pubmed: 7452329
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2000;142(2):221-2
pubmed: 10795900
Surg Neurol Int. 2015 Oct 23;6(Suppl 21):S549-52
pubmed: 26664870
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998 Jan;19(1):45-9
pubmed: 9432156

Auteurs

Yuhei Michiwaki (Y)

Department of Neurosurgery, International University of Health and Welfare, School of Medicine, Narita Hospital, Narita City, Chiba, Japan.

Masatou Kawashima (M)

Department of Neurosurgery, International University of Health and Welfare, School of Medicine, Narita Hospital, Narita City, Chiba, Japan.

Tatsuya Tanaka (T)

Department of Neurosurgery, International University of Health and Welfare, School of Medicine, Narita Hospital, Narita City, Chiba, Japan.

Ryohei Sashida (R)

Department of Neurosurgery, International University of Health and Welfare, School of Medicine, Narita Hospital, Narita City, Chiba, Japan.

Yu Hirokawa (Y)

Department of Neurosurgery, International University of Health and Welfare, School of Medicine, Narita Hospital, Narita City, Chiba, Japan.

Tomihiro Wakamiya (T)

Department of Neurosurgery, International University of Health and Welfare, School of Medicine, Narita Hospital, Narita City, Chiba, Japan.

Kazuaki Shimoji (K)

Department of Neurosurgery, International University of Health and Welfare, School of Medicine, Narita Hospital, Narita City, Chiba, Japan.

Eiichi Suehiro (E)

Department of Neurosurgery, International University of Health and Welfare, School of Medicine, Narita Hospital, Narita City, Chiba, Japan.

Keisuke Onoda (K)

Department of Neurosurgery, International University of Health and Welfare, School of Medicine, Narita Hospital, Narita City, Chiba, Japan.

Fumitaka Yamane (F)

Department of Neurosurgery, International University of Health and Welfare, School of Medicine, Narita Hospital, Narita City, Chiba, Japan.

Akira Matsuno (A)

Department of Neurosurgery, International University of Health and Welfare, School of Medicine, Narita Hospital, Narita City, Chiba, Japan.

Classifications MeSH