Natural and hybrid immunity following four COVID-19 waves: A prospective cohort study of mothers in South Africa.
Antibodies
COVID-19
Hybrid immunity
Protective threshold
SARS-CoV-2
Vaccination
Variant
Journal
EClinicalMedicine
ISSN: 2589-5370
Titre abrégé: EClinicalMedicine
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101733727
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
20
07
2022
revised:
18
08
2022
accepted:
29
08
2022
entrez:
21
9
2022
pubmed:
22
9
2022
medline:
22
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
More than half the global population has been exposed to SARS-CoV-2. Naturally induced immunity influences the outcome of subsequent exposure to variants and vaccine responses. We measured anti-spike IgG responses to explore the basis for this enhanced immunity. A prospective cohort study of mothers in a South African community through ancestral/beta/delta/omicron SARS-CoV-2 waves (March 2020-February 2022). Health seeking behaviour/illness were recorded and post-wave serum samples probed for IgG to Spike (CoV2-S-IgG) by ECLISA. To estimate protective CoV2-S-IgG threshold levels, logistic functions were fit to describe the correlation of CoV2-S-IgG measured before a wave and the probability for seroconversion/boosting thereafter for unvaccinated and vaccinated adults. Despite little disease, 176/339 (51·9%) participants were seropositive following wave 1, rising to 74%, 89·8% and 97·3% after waves 2, 3 and 4 respectively. CoV2-S-IgG induced by natural exposure protected against subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection with the greatest protection for beta and least for omicron. Vaccination induced higher CoV2-S-IgG in seropositive compared to naïve vaccinees. Amongst seropositive participants, proportions above the 50% protection against infection threshold were 69% (95% CrI: 62, 72) following 1 vaccine dose, 63% (95% CrI: 63, 75) following 2 doses and only 11% (95% CrI: 7, 14) in unvaccinated during the omicron wave. Naturally induced CoV2-S-IgG do not achieve high enough levels to prevent omicron infection in most exposed individuals but are substantially boosted by vaccination leading to significant protection. A single vaccination in those with prior immunity is more immunogenic than 2 doses in a naïve vaccinee and may provide adequate protection. UK NIH GECO award (GEC111), Wellcome Trust Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Africa (CIDRI), Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, USA (OPP1017641, OPP1017579) and NIH H3 Africa (U54HG009824, U01AI110466]. HZ is supported by the SA-MRC. MPN is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant (APP1174455). BJQ is supported by a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1139859). Stefan Flasche is supported by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (Grant number 208812/Z/17/Z).
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
More than half the global population has been exposed to SARS-CoV-2. Naturally induced immunity influences the outcome of subsequent exposure to variants and vaccine responses. We measured anti-spike IgG responses to explore the basis for this enhanced immunity.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
A prospective cohort study of mothers in a South African community through ancestral/beta/delta/omicron SARS-CoV-2 waves (March 2020-February 2022). Health seeking behaviour/illness were recorded and post-wave serum samples probed for IgG to Spike (CoV2-S-IgG) by ECLISA. To estimate protective CoV2-S-IgG threshold levels, logistic functions were fit to describe the correlation of CoV2-S-IgG measured before a wave and the probability for seroconversion/boosting thereafter for unvaccinated and vaccinated adults.
Findings
UNASSIGNED
Despite little disease, 176/339 (51·9%) participants were seropositive following wave 1, rising to 74%, 89·8% and 97·3% after waves 2, 3 and 4 respectively. CoV2-S-IgG induced by natural exposure protected against subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection with the greatest protection for beta and least for omicron. Vaccination induced higher CoV2-S-IgG in seropositive compared to naïve vaccinees. Amongst seropositive participants, proportions above the 50% protection against infection threshold were 69% (95% CrI: 62, 72) following 1 vaccine dose, 63% (95% CrI: 63, 75) following 2 doses and only 11% (95% CrI: 7, 14) in unvaccinated during the omicron wave.
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
Naturally induced CoV2-S-IgG do not achieve high enough levels to prevent omicron infection in most exposed individuals but are substantially boosted by vaccination leading to significant protection. A single vaccination in those with prior immunity is more immunogenic than 2 doses in a naïve vaccinee and may provide adequate protection.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
UK NIH GECO award (GEC111), Wellcome Trust Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Africa (CIDRI), Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, USA (OPP1017641, OPP1017579) and NIH H3 Africa (U54HG009824, U01AI110466]. HZ is supported by the SA-MRC. MPN is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant (APP1174455). BJQ is supported by a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1139859). Stefan Flasche is supported by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (Grant number 208812/Z/17/Z).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36128333
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101655
pii: S2589-5370(22)00385-6
pmc: PMC9481335
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101655Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/V028782/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
HJZ reports grants from UK NIHR, the Wellcome Trust Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Africa, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the NIH H3 Africa and the SA-MRC. MPN is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant (APP1174455). BJQ is supported by a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1139859). Stefan Flasche is supported by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society.
Références
Nat Med. 2021 Nov;27(11):2032-2040
pubmed: 34588689
J Clin Virol. 2020 Sep;130:104572
pubmed: 32769024
Sci Immunol. 2022 Jun 23;:eabq4450
pubmed: 35737747
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Aug;7(8):
pubmed: 35998978
Cell. 2022 Mar 17;185(6):1025-1040.e14
pubmed: 35148837
N Engl J Med. 2022 Apr 21;386(16):1532-1546
pubmed: 35249272
Nat Rev Immunol. 2022 Jun;22(6):333-334
pubmed: 35440758
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 31;386(13):1207-1220
pubmed: 35172051
Thorax. 2015 Jun;70(6):592-4
pubmed: 25228292
Science. 2022 Jan 07;375(6576):43-50
pubmed: 34812653
Lancet. 2022 Feb 26;399(10327):814-823
pubmed: 35131043
Nat Med. 2021 Jul;27(7):1205-1211
pubmed: 34002089
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 7;387(1):21-34
pubmed: 35704396
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 30;385(27):2585-2586
pubmed: 34910864
Euro Surveill. 2022 Jan;27(4):
pubmed: 35086609
Vaccine. 2022 Jan 21;40(2):306-315
pubmed: 34933765
Sci Immunol. 2022 Feb 18;7(68):eabn8014
pubmed: 35076258
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7854):438-443
pubmed: 33690265
Cell Host Microbe. 2022 Aug 10;30(8):1077-1083.e4
pubmed: 35594867
Science. 2022 May 6;376(6593):eabn4947
pubmed: 35289632
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jun;22(6):821-834
pubmed: 35298900
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Apr 15;71(15):545-548
pubmed: 35421076
N Engl J Med. 2022 Apr 7;386(14):1377-1380
pubmed: 35297591
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jul;22(7):990-1001
pubmed: 35447085
Science. 2021 Feb 12;371(6530):741-745
pubmed: 33436525
Vaccine. 2021 Jul 22;39(32):4423-4428
pubmed: 34210573