Preparation of ultrafiltration membrane from discarded polyethylene terephthalate bottles.
Contact angle
Flux
Melt flow index
Polyethylene terephthalate
Porosity
Thermogravimetric analysis
Ultrafiltration membrane
Journal
Environmental science and pollution research international
ISSN: 1614-7499
Titre abrégé: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9441769
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
30
03
2022
accepted:
13
09
2022
medline:
7
4
2023
pubmed:
22
9
2022
entrez:
21
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In this study, the polymeric membranes were prepared using discarded polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles. The fabrication of the membrane process was carried out using a dope solution composed of polyethylene terephthalate (polymer), O-cresol (as a solvent), and polyethylene glycol 400 (as an additive). The solubility parameters were studied to dissolve the polymer into the solvent at a specific temperature. The melt flow index and thermal analysis were evaluated for the discarded bottles and prepared membranes to ensure the quality and thermal stability of the PET. The porosity of the membranes was determined using scanning electron microscopy. The temperature required to prepare the dope solution was 80 °C with a stirring speed of 350 rpm. Non-solvent-induced phase separation method was used to fabricate the membranes. The coagulation bath was composed of a water-ethanol mixture. The porosity of the prepared membranes ranges between 30 and 50%. The contact angle was determined for the membrane in the range of 40° to 80°. The flux of the membranes was evaluated using membrane testing cell at a specified pressure which ranges from 80 to 150 Lm
Identifiants
pubmed: 36129647
doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23068-8
pii: 10.1007/s11356-022-23068-8
doi:
Substances chimiques
Polyethylene Terephthalates
0
Polymers
0
Water
059QF0KO0R
Solvents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
42728-42737Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Al-Ani DM, Al-Ani FH, Alsalhy QF, Ibrahim SS (2021) Preparation and characterization of ultrafiltration membranes from PPSU-PES polymer blend for dye removal. Chem Eng Commun 208:41–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2019.1683546
doi: 10.1080/00986445.2019.1683546
Alvi MAUR, Khalid MW, Ahmad NM et al (2019) Polymer concentration and solvent variation correlation with the morphology and water filtration analysis of polyether sulfone microfiltration membrane. Adv Polym Technol 2019:8074626. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8074626
doi: 10.1155/2019/8074626
Awaja F, Pavel D (2005) Recycling of PET. Eur Polym J 41:1453–1477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.02.005
doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.02.005
Bildyukevich A, Plisko T, Shustikov A, et al (2020) Effect of the solvent nature on the structure and performance of poly(amide-imide) ultrafiltration membranes. J Mater Sci 55 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04714-3
Cassano A, Conidi C, Ruby-Figueroa R, Castro-Muñoz R (2018) Nanofiltration and tight ultrafiltration membranes for the recovery of polyphenols from agro-food by-products. Int J Mol Sci 19 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19020351
Chen J, Shen L, Zhang M et al (2016) Thermodynamic analysis of effects of contact angle on interfacial interactions and its implications for membrane fouling control. Bioresour Technol 201:245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.063
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.063
Chen D, Sirkar KK, Jin C et al (2017) Membrane-based technologies in the pharmaceutical industry and continuous production of polymer-coated crystals/particles. Curr Pharm Des 23:242–249
doi: 10.2174/1381612822666161025145229
Dhawan G (2020) About ultrafiltration. Applied Membrane Inc. https://appliedmembranes.com/media/wysiwyg/pdf/systems/about_ultrafiltration_technical_article.pdf . Accessed 10 Jan 2022
Elamri A, Abid K, Harzallah O, Lallam A (2015) Characterization of recycled / virgin PET polymers and their composites. 3:11–16 https://doi.org/10.11648/j.nano.s.2015030401.13
Figoli A, Marino T, Galiano F (2016) Polymeric membranes in biorefinery. In: Figoli A, Cassano A, Basile A (eds) Membrane Technologies for Biorefining. Woodhead Publishing, pp 29–59
Fink JK (2012) Chapter 21 - dispersions, emulsions, and foams. In: Fink JK (ed) Petroleum Engineer’s Guide to Oil Field Chemicals and Fluids. Gulf Professional Publishing, Boston, pp 663–694
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-383844-5.00021-0
Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL (2017) Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci Adv 3:e1700782. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1700782
Hansen CM (1967) The three dimensional solubility parameter and solvent diffusion coefficient. Dissertation, The Polytechnic Danish University of Technology
Hendrix K, Vaneynde M, Vankelecom I (2013) Synthesis of modified poly(ether ether ketone) polymer for the preparation of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes via phase inversion. J Memb Sci 447:96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.006
doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.006
Imdad S, Dohare RK (2022) A critical review on heavy metals removal using ionic liquid membranes from the industrial wastewater. Chem Eng Process - Process Intensif 173:108812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2022.108812
doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2022.108812
Ismail N, Jakariah N, Bolong N, et al (2017) Effect of polymer concentration on the morphology and mechanical properties of asymmetric polysulfone (PSf) membrane. J Appl Membr Sci Technol 21 https://doi.org/10.11113/amst.v21i1.107
Kahrs C, Gühlstorf T, Schwellenbach J (2020) Influences of different preparation variables on polymeric membrane formation via nonsolvent induced phase separation. J Appl Polym Sci 137:48852. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.48852
doi: 10.1002/app.48852
Kumar V, Singh R, Ahuja IPS (2022) Use of thermosetting polymers for smart civil structures. In: Encyclopedia of materials: plastics and polymers. Elsevier, pp 662–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820352-1.00067-5
Kusumocahyo SP, Ambani SK, Marceline S (2021) Improved permeate flux and rejection of ultrafiltration membranes prepared from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottle waste. Sustain Environ Res 31:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-021-00091-x
doi: 10.1186/s42834-021-00091-x
Latthe SS, Terashima C, Nakata K, Fujishima A (2014) Superhydrophobic surfaces developed by mimicking hierarchical surface morphology of lotus leaf. Molecules 19:4256–4283. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules19044256
doi: 10.3390/molecules19044256
Li P (2017) Effect of polymer dope concentration on the morphology and performance of PES/PDMS hollow fiber composite membrane for gas separation. Juniper Online J Mater Sci 1:1–5. https://doi.org/10.19080/jojms.2017.01.555573
doi: 10.19080/jojms.2017.01.555573
Ma Y, Shi F, Ma J et al (2011) Effect of PEG additive on the morphology and performance of polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 272:51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.054
doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.054
McKeen L (2012) Introduction to the physical, mechanical, and thermal properties of plastics and elastomers. In: McKeen L (ed) The Effect of Sterilization on Plastics and Elastomers, 3rd edn. William Andrew Publishing, Boston, pp 57–84
doi: 10.1016/B978-1-4557-2598-4.00003-4
Mohammad AW, Ng CY, Lim YP, Ng GH (2012) Ultrafiltration in food processing industry: review on application, membrane fouling, and fouling control. Food Bioprocess Technol 5:1143–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0806-9
doi: 10.1007/s11947-012-0806-9
Mulder M (1997) Basic principles of membrane technology, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 564
Plastics Europe, EPRO (2016) Plastics – the facts 2016: an analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data. PlasticsEurope. https://plasticseurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2016-Plastic-the-facts.pdf . Accessed 20 Jan 2022
Pulido BA, Habboub OS, Aristizabal SL et al (2019) Recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) for high temperature solvent resistant membranes. ACS Appl Polym Mater 1:2379–2387. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.9b00493
doi: 10.1021/acsapm.9b00493
Rabiee H, Vatanpour V, Borghei SM (2015) Fouling reduction of emulsion polyvinylchloride ultrafiltration membranes blended by PEG: The effect of additive concentration and coagulation bath temperature. Desalin water Treat 57. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1048739
Rajesh S, Murthy ZVP (2014) Ultrafiltration membranes from waste polyethylene terephthalate and additives: synthesis and characterization. Quim Nova 37:653–657. https://doi.org/10.5935/0100-4042.20140097
doi: 10.5935/0100-4042.20140097
Singh R (2015) Introduction to membrane technology. Membrane technology and engineering for water purification, pp 1–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-63362-0.00001-x
Sofiah H, Nora`aini A, Marinah MA (2010) The influence of polymer concentration on performance and morphology of asymmetric ultrafiltration membrane for lysozyme separation. J Appl Sci 10:3325–3330. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2010.3325.3330
Spear MJ, Eder A, Carus M (2015) Wood polymer composites. In: Ansell MP (ed) Wood Composites. Woodhead Publishing, pp 195–249
Sulyman M, Haponiuk J, Formela K (2016) Utilization of recycled polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in engineering materials: a review. Int J Environ Sci Dev 7:100–108. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijesd.2016.v7.749
doi: 10.7763/ijesd.2016.v7.749
Tiab D, Donaldson EC (2012) Wettability. In: Tiab D, Donaldson EC (eds) Petrophysics, 3rd edn. Gulf Professional Publishing, Boston, pp 371–418
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-383848-3.00006-2
Wang C, Xiao C, Huang Q, Pan J (2015) A study on structure and properties of poly(p-phenylene terephthamide) hybrid porous membranes. J Memb Sci 474:132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.09.055
doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.09.055
Williams M (2013) The Merck Index: an encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs, and biologicals, 15th Edition Edited by M.J.O’Neil, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK ISBN 9781849736701; 2708 pages. April 2013, $150 with 1-year free access to The Merck Index Online. Drug Dev Res 74:339–339. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.21085