PIK3CA mutation status, progression and survival in advanced HR + /HER2- breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published clinical trials.


Journal

BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Sep 2022
Historique:
received: 28 10 2021
accepted: 05 09 2022
entrez: 21 9 2022
pubmed: 22 9 2022
medline: 24 9 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Approximately 40% of hormone receptor positive/human epidermal receptor 2 negative (HR + /HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients harbor phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutations. However, associations between PIK3CA mutation status and clinical outcomes among patients with HR + /HER2- mBC have been heterogeneous across clinical trials. This meta-analysis was conducted to survey recently available trial data to assess the prognostic effects of PIK3CA among patients with HR + /HER2- mBC.  METHODS: Randomized clinical trials reporting progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) stratified by PIK3CA status in HR + /HER2- mBC were identified via systematic literature review. Trial arms receiving phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-targeted therapies were excluded. Meta-regression analysis was used to estimate the association between PIK3CA status and PFS and OS among included studies. The analyzed data included 3,219 patients from 33 study arms across 11 trials (PIK3CA mutated: 1,386, wild type: 1,833). PIK3CA mutation was associated with shorter median PFS (difference [95% CI] (months): -1.8 [-3.4, -0.1], I Pooling evidence across multiple studies, PIK3CA mutation was associated with shorter PFS and OS. These findings suggest a negative prognostic value of PIK3CA mutations in patients with HR + /HER2- mBC.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Approximately 40% of hormone receptor positive/human epidermal receptor 2 negative (HR + /HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients harbor phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutations. However, associations between PIK3CA mutation status and clinical outcomes among patients with HR + /HER2- mBC have been heterogeneous across clinical trials. This meta-analysis was conducted to survey recently available trial data to assess the prognostic effects of PIK3CA among patients with HR + /HER2- mBC.  METHODS: Randomized clinical trials reporting progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) stratified by PIK3CA status in HR + /HER2- mBC were identified via systematic literature review. Trial arms receiving phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-targeted therapies were excluded. Meta-regression analysis was used to estimate the association between PIK3CA status and PFS and OS among included studies.
RESULTS RESULTS
The analyzed data included 3,219 patients from 33 study arms across 11 trials (PIK3CA mutated: 1,386, wild type: 1,833). PIK3CA mutation was associated with shorter median PFS (difference [95% CI] (months): -1.8 [-3.4, -0.1], I
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Pooling evidence across multiple studies, PIK3CA mutation was associated with shorter PFS and OS. These findings suggest a negative prognostic value of PIK3CA mutations in patients with HR + /HER2- mBC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36131248
doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10078-5
pii: 10.1186/s12885-022-10078-5
pmc: PMC9490901
doi:

Substances chimiques

Phosphatidylinositols 0
Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases EC 2.7.1.137
PIK3CA protein, human EC 2.7.1.137
Receptor, ErbB-2 EC 2.7.10.1

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1002

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
pubmed: 3802833
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 16;380(20):1929-1940
pubmed: 31091374
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1926-1936
pubmed: 30345905
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 10;34(5):419-26
pubmed: 26503204
Ann Oncol. 2021 Feb;32(2):208-217
pubmed: 33246021
Bull Exp Biol Med. 2017 Jun;163(2):250-254
pubmed: 28726194
Clin Breast Cancer. 2020 Jun;20(3):e232-e243
pubmed: 32234362
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):425-439
pubmed: 26947331
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Nov;136(2):355-63
pubmed: 22245973
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):811-821
pubmed: 27155741
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;103:147-154
pubmed: 30241001
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Oct 01;2(10):1310-1315
pubmed: 27532364
Med Decis Making. 2013 Aug;33(6):743-54
pubmed: 23341049
Value Health. 2000 Jan-Feb;3(1):23-30
pubmed: 16464178
Breast. 2012 Jun;21(3):242-52
pubmed: 22425534
Ann Oncol. 2020 Mar;31(3):377-386
pubmed: 32067679
Nat Rev Cancer. 2015 Jan;15(1):7-24
pubmed: 25533673
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar;10(3):143-53
pubmed: 23400000
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Feb 01;12:9
pubmed: 22297116
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug;145(8):2051-2059
pubmed: 31270600
J Cell Biochem. 2018 Jun;119(6):4287-4292
pubmed: 29345357
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2015 May 15;7:111-23
pubmed: 26028978
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr 20;32(12):1202-9
pubmed: 24663045
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;36(10):981-990
pubmed: 29470143
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 19;14:135
pubmed: 25524443
Nature. 2012 Oct 4;490(7418):61-70
pubmed: 23000897
Mol Cancer Ther. 2020 Dec;19(12):2612-2620
pubmed: 32999047
J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Feb;59(2):198-204
pubmed: 28166126
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Sep 15;24(18):4380-4387
pubmed: 29793946
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jan 1;23(1):26-34
pubmed: 27126994
Br J Cancer. 2017 Mar 14;116(6):726-730
pubmed: 28183140
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1836-1846
pubmed: 29117498
Am J Cancer Res. 2018 Sep 01;8(9):1873-1886
pubmed: 30323979
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10:ED000142
pubmed: 31643080
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 May;15(5):273-291
pubmed: 29508857
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):904-916
pubmed: 28576675
Mol Oncol. 2016 Mar;10(3):464-74
pubmed: 26776681
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):2951-8
pubmed: 25071141
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 10;31(26):3182-90
pubmed: 23775962
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):87-100
pubmed: 29223745
Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Apr 14;28(8):1500-1506
pubmed: 35121623
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Apr 28;106(5):
pubmed: 24777111

Auteurs

Mirko Fillbrunn (M)

Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

James Signorovitch (J)

Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA. James.Signorovitch@analysisgroup.com.

Fabrice André (F)

Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Iris Wang (I)

Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.

Ines Lorenzo (I)

Novartis, Madrid, Spain.

Antonia Ridolfi (A)

Novartis, Paris, France.

Jinhee Park (J)

Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.

Akanksha Dua (A)

Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Hope S Rugo (HS)

University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH