Audiovisual teleconsultation for patients with epilepsy in primary care in rural Germany: a pilot study on feasibility and acceptance.
Distance counselling
Epilepsy
Family practice
General practice
General practitioner
Neurologist
Remote consultation
Teleconsultation
Telemedicine
e-health
e-therapy
Journal
Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Sep 2022
21 Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
15
12
2021
accepted:
14
09
2022
entrez:
21
9
2022
pubmed:
22
9
2022
medline:
22
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In rural areas, epilepsy patients have limited access to specialist secondary care. Substantial travel and waiting times of several hours are common. Communication between general practitioners (GP) and specialist epileptologists regarding diagnosis and treatment is further complicated by the high workload on both sides and the different prioritisation of treatment goals. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of an interprofessional audiovisual patient-doctor teleconsultation, and its acceptance in clinical practice in patients with epilepsy in a rural region in Germany. Ten patients participated in telemedicine consultations in their GP practice. The practice was located in a sparsely populated region of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, and was equipped with technical equipment specifically procured for the project. An explorative qualitative interview was conducted with all participants. We based this paper on the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ). Despite initial uncertainties on the patients' side regarding the consultation setting, all participants found the teleconsultation helpful. Some patients were initially intimidated and felt slightly overwhelmed by the attention provided and the technology used (multiple HD cameras, large high-resolution screens). However, during the consultation, they felt supported by their GP and were satisfied that their needs were addressed in an appropriate and timely manner. The hardware used was not felt to be a nuisance or to interfere with the conversation between doctor and patient. Patients also appreciated the time saved and the organisational convenience compared to a visit to a university outpatient clinic. Most consultations led to therapeutic consequences. Some patients seemed to benefit particularly, for example those who needed a medication change. This pilot study provides first evidence that teleconsultations between patients, specialists, and GPs are possible in rural areas. Interprofessional collaboration between GPs and epileptologists can improve the care of patients with epilepsy. Further research should investigate the effectiveness and efficiency of interprofessional telemedicine consultations for epilepsy and other conditions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In rural areas, epilepsy patients have limited access to specialist secondary care. Substantial travel and waiting times of several hours are common. Communication between general practitioners (GP) and specialist epileptologists regarding diagnosis and treatment is further complicated by the high workload on both sides and the different prioritisation of treatment goals. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of an interprofessional audiovisual patient-doctor teleconsultation, and its acceptance in clinical practice in patients with epilepsy in a rural region in Germany.
METHOD
METHODS
Ten patients participated in telemedicine consultations in their GP practice. The practice was located in a sparsely populated region of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, and was equipped with technical equipment specifically procured for the project. An explorative qualitative interview was conducted with all participants. We based this paper on the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Despite initial uncertainties on the patients' side regarding the consultation setting, all participants found the teleconsultation helpful. Some patients were initially intimidated and felt slightly overwhelmed by the attention provided and the technology used (multiple HD cameras, large high-resolution screens). However, during the consultation, they felt supported by their GP and were satisfied that their needs were addressed in an appropriate and timely manner. The hardware used was not felt to be a nuisance or to interfere with the conversation between doctor and patient. Patients also appreciated the time saved and the organisational convenience compared to a visit to a university outpatient clinic. Most consultations led to therapeutic consequences. Some patients seemed to benefit particularly, for example those who needed a medication change.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This pilot study provides first evidence that teleconsultations between patients, specialists, and GPs are possible in rural areas. Interprofessional collaboration between GPs and epileptologists can improve the care of patients with epilepsy. Further research should investigate the effectiveness and efficiency of interprofessional telemedicine consultations for epilepsy and other conditions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36131332
doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01171-4
pii: 10.1186/s40814-022-01171-4
pmc: PMC9490945
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
213Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
CNS Drugs. 2014 Aug;28(8):753-9
pubmed: 25005594
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Dec;60(12):1383-1392
pubmed: 29075812
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jan;15(1):106-15
pubmed: 26549780
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 19;16(1):587
pubmed: 27756338
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Seizure. 2010 Dec;19(10):630-6
pubmed: 21075013
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 1;22(10):e19415
pubmed: 32812887
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019 Jan;20:e5
pubmed: 29909798
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug 08;11:185
pubmed: 21824388
Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Dec;41(6):1319-20
pubmed: 22968493
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 May;70(5):520-5
pubmed: 26573236
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 20;21(1):713
pubmed: 34284786
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 19;21(8):e13382
pubmed: 31429419
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 May 29;20(1):73
pubmed: 31142267