Systematic review of the portion size norm of discretionary foods.

discretionary foods portion control portion size norm

Journal

Nutrition reviews
ISSN: 1753-4887
Titre abrégé: Nutr Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376405

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 04 2023
Historique:
medline: 12 4 2023
pubmed: 23 9 2022
entrez: 22 9 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Portion size norm is described as the perception of how much of a given food people choose to eat. Reducing the portion size norm of foods that are high in saturated fat, added sugar, and added salt toward smaller sizes might be a potential strategy to promote appropriate portion size selections. However, an overview of existing portion size norms for discretionary foods has yet to be established. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the portion size norm of discretionary foods and assess the methodologies used to investigate the norm. The literature search was conducted in 6 databases following the PRISMA guidelines (from inception to January 2022). Forty studies were eligible and grouped into 3 categories by portion size norm measures: normal (n = 26), appropriate (n = 8), and preferred portion sizes (n = 3). Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. A wide range of portion sizes were considered normal for each food type, with means/medians varying from 2- to 4-fold among studies. Studies differed considerably in design, with variables including the setting, food type, food presentation, the manner in which portion-size-related questions were formulated, and the range and number of displayed serving size options. The quality of reviewed studies was mixed (25 studies had low or moderate risk of bias, 15 had high risk of bias), and the method of assessing portion size was not validated in 15 of 33 quantitative studies. The assessment of portion size in future studies should be conducted using tools that are validated for the population of interest so that more definitive conclusions can be drawn regarding portion size norms for discretionary foods. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021249911.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36137249
pii: 6711604
doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuac074
doi:

Substances chimiques

Sugars 0

Types de publication

Systematic Review Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

531-554

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Qingzhou Liu (Q)

Faculty of Science, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Leanne Wang (L)

Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Discipline of Nutrition and Dietetics, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Margaret Allman-Farinelli (M)

Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Discipline of Nutrition and Dietetics, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Anna Rangan (A)

Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Discipline of Nutrition and Dietetics, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH