How to deal with moral challenges around the decision-making competence in transgender adolescent care? Development of an ethics support tool.
Clinical ethics support
Decision-making competence
Ethics support tool
Transgender adolescents
Journal
BMC medical ethics
ISSN: 1472-6939
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088680
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 09 2022
22 09 2022
Historique:
received:
25
05
2022
accepted:
13
09
2022
entrez:
22
9
2022
pubmed:
23
9
2022
medline:
28
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Decision-making competence is a complex concept in the care for transgender and gender diverse adolescents, since this type of care concerns one's developing gender identity and involves treatment options that often lack international consensus. Even despite competence assessments, moral challenges arise in the decision-making process. Here, traditional forms of clinical ethics support such as moral case deliberation might not fit as these do not provide thematic guidance. This study therefore aimed to develop a practice-oriented ethics support tool to assist care providers when dealing with moral challenges around decision-making competence in transgender adolescent care. The study followed a participatory design to develop a tool in close collaboration with care providers; they had a say in all phases of development and dissemination. Firstly, nine care providers were interviewed about experienced moral challenges and needs for ethics support. Based on this, the structure and content of the tool was constructed and discussed in two focus group meetings, after which four care providers tested the tool and additional feedback was collected from the team and an advisory board. The final tool was presented to all Dutch care providers in transgender adolescent care. Care providers expressed a need for guidance in defining and assessing decision-making competence. Main moral challenges concerned discussing fertility options with young clients, dealing with co-occurring mental health difficulties and the decision-making role of parents. The final tool, named the Competence Consultant, is an interactive pdf containing four parts: (1) Clarify information; (2) Identify doubts and moral questions; (3) Guidance for conversations and (4) Overview and Conclusions. Developing an ethics support tool in a controversial care setting is highly relevant as it aims to help individual care providers in defining, discussing and dealing with their moral challenges in actual practice. The 'Competence Consultant' for transgender care providers contributes to their moral sensitivity and moral competence. It is an example of the development of innovative and integrative forms of thematic ethics support.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Decision-making competence is a complex concept in the care for transgender and gender diverse adolescents, since this type of care concerns one's developing gender identity and involves treatment options that often lack international consensus. Even despite competence assessments, moral challenges arise in the decision-making process. Here, traditional forms of clinical ethics support such as moral case deliberation might not fit as these do not provide thematic guidance. This study therefore aimed to develop a practice-oriented ethics support tool to assist care providers when dealing with moral challenges around decision-making competence in transgender adolescent care.
METHODS
The study followed a participatory design to develop a tool in close collaboration with care providers; they had a say in all phases of development and dissemination. Firstly, nine care providers were interviewed about experienced moral challenges and needs for ethics support. Based on this, the structure and content of the tool was constructed and discussed in two focus group meetings, after which four care providers tested the tool and additional feedback was collected from the team and an advisory board. The final tool was presented to all Dutch care providers in transgender adolescent care.
RESULTS
Care providers expressed a need for guidance in defining and assessing decision-making competence. Main moral challenges concerned discussing fertility options with young clients, dealing with co-occurring mental health difficulties and the decision-making role of parents. The final tool, named the Competence Consultant, is an interactive pdf containing four parts: (1) Clarify information; (2) Identify doubts and moral questions; (3) Guidance for conversations and (4) Overview and Conclusions.
DISCUSSION
Developing an ethics support tool in a controversial care setting is highly relevant as it aims to help individual care providers in defining, discussing and dealing with their moral challenges in actual practice. The 'Competence Consultant' for transgender care providers contributes to their moral sensitivity and moral competence. It is an example of the development of innovative and integrative forms of thematic ethics support.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36138384
doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00837-1
pii: 10.1186/s12910-022-00837-1
pmc: PMC9494804
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
96Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021 Sep;5(9):e32
pubmed: 34237285
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021 Sep;5(9):e35-e36
pubmed: 34418374
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Feb;19(2):45-59
pubmed: 30784385
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011 May 17;7(8):466-72
pubmed: 21587245
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Feb;19(2):63-65
pubmed: 31543013
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 1;357(18):1834-40
pubmed: 17978292
AMA J Ethics. 2020 May 1;22(5):E423-429
pubmed: 32449659
J Med Ethics. 2022 Feb 7;:
pubmed: 35131805
J Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 10;:
pubmed: 33692171
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Oct;57(4):367-73
pubmed: 26119518
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Oct;49(7):2619-2634
pubmed: 32592076
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Dec 22;19(1):97
pubmed: 30577790
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Nov 1;102(11):3869-3903
pubmed: 28945902
Milbank Q. 2016 Jun;94(2):392-429
pubmed: 27265562
J Sex Marital Ther. 2022 Mar 17;:1-22
pubmed: 35300570
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Nov 6;19(1):85
pubmed: 30400913
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Feb;19(2):75-77
pubmed: 31543020
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;163(8):1323-34
pubmed: 16877642
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Feb;19(2):67-69
pubmed: 31543017
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Nov 09;16(1):76
pubmed: 26553304
J Homosex. 2012;59(3):301-20
pubmed: 22455322
J Adolesc. 2020 Feb;79:136-147
pubmed: 31972534
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Aug 26;21(1):79
pubmed: 32847572
HEC Forum. 2019 Sep;31(3):241-260
pubmed: 31098934
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jan 30;21(1):10
pubmed: 32000784
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Nov;19(11):71-73
pubmed: 31661408
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):780-1
pubmed: 22375967
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021 Jun;5(6):385
pubmed: 34000232
Int J Transgend Health. 2021 Apr 5;22(3):217-224
pubmed: 34240066
Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Oct;45(7):1697-703
pubmed: 27251640
Health Promot Int. 2021 Apr 15;36(2):570-580
pubmed: 32596730
Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Nov;48(11):1415-9
pubmed: 9355168
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Jul 22;17(1):45
pubmed: 27448597
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 17;:
pubmed: 36115898
Pediatrics. 2021 Dec 1;148(6):
pubmed: 34850191
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Mar;27(2):390-406
pubmed: 31177947
Arch Sex Behav. 2018 Nov;47(8):2319-2333
pubmed: 30229517
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2016 Dec;63(6):1121-1135
pubmed: 27865337
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 25;18(1):585
pubmed: 30045726