Factors impacting-stillbirth and neonatal death audit in Malawi: a qualitative study.


Journal

BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Sep 2022
Historique:
received: 28 06 2022
accepted: 15 09 2022
entrez: 22 9 2022
pubmed: 23 9 2022
medline: 28 9 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Over one million babies are stillborn or die within the first 28 days of life each year due to preventable causes and poor-quality care in resource-constrained countries. Death audit may be a valuable tool for improving quality of care and decreasing mortality. However, challenges in implementing audit and their subsequent action plans have been reported, with few successfully implemented and sustained. This study aimed to identify factors that affect stillbirth and neonatal death audit at the facility level in the southern region of Malawi. Thirty-eight semi-structured interviews and seven focus group discussions with death audit committee members were conducted. Thematic analysis was guided by a conceptual framework applied deductively, combined with inductive line-by-line coding to identify additional emerging themes. The factors that affected audit at individual, facility and national level were related to training, staff motivation, power dynamics and autonomy, audit organisation and data support. We found that factors were linked because they informed each other. Inadequate staff training was caused by a lack of financial allocation at the facility level and donor-driven approaches to training at the national level, with training taking place only with support from funders. Staff motivation was affected by the institutional norms of reliance on monetary incentives during meetings, gazetted at the national level so that audits happened only if such incentives were available. This overshadowed other benefits and non-monetary incentives which were not promoted at the facility level. Inadequate resources to support audit were informed by limited facility-level autonomy and decision-making powers which remained controlled at the national level despite decentralisation. Action plan implementation challenges after audit meetings resulted from inadequate support at the facility level and inadequate audit policy and guidelines at the national level. Poor documentation affected audit processes informed by inadequate supervision and promotion of data usage at both facility and national levels. Given that the factors that facilitate or inhibit audits are interconnected, implementers, policymakers and managers need to be aware that addressing barriers is likely to require a whole health systems approach targeting all system levels. This will require behavioural and complex intervention approaches.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Over one million babies are stillborn or die within the first 28 days of life each year due to preventable causes and poor-quality care in resource-constrained countries. Death audit may be a valuable tool for improving quality of care and decreasing mortality. However, challenges in implementing audit and their subsequent action plans have been reported, with few successfully implemented and sustained. This study aimed to identify factors that affect stillbirth and neonatal death audit at the facility level in the southern region of Malawi.
METHODS METHODS
Thirty-eight semi-structured interviews and seven focus group discussions with death audit committee members were conducted. Thematic analysis was guided by a conceptual framework applied deductively, combined with inductive line-by-line coding to identify additional emerging themes.
RESULTS RESULTS
The factors that affected audit at individual, facility and national level were related to training, staff motivation, power dynamics and autonomy, audit organisation and data support. We found that factors were linked because they informed each other. Inadequate staff training was caused by a lack of financial allocation at the facility level and donor-driven approaches to training at the national level, with training taking place only with support from funders. Staff motivation was affected by the institutional norms of reliance on monetary incentives during meetings, gazetted at the national level so that audits happened only if such incentives were available. This overshadowed other benefits and non-monetary incentives which were not promoted at the facility level. Inadequate resources to support audit were informed by limited facility-level autonomy and decision-making powers which remained controlled at the national level despite decentralisation. Action plan implementation challenges after audit meetings resulted from inadequate support at the facility level and inadequate audit policy and guidelines at the national level. Poor documentation affected audit processes informed by inadequate supervision and promotion of data usage at both facility and national levels.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Given that the factors that facilitate or inhibit audits are interconnected, implementers, policymakers and managers need to be aware that addressing barriers is likely to require a whole health systems approach targeting all system levels. This will require behavioural and complex intervention approaches.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36138396
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08578-y
pii: 10.1186/s12913-022-08578-y
pmc: PMC9502637
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1191

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Commonwealth Scholarship Commission
ID : MWCS -2018-802

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Int Health. 2011 Mar;3(1):7-14
pubmed: 24038045
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 17;16(1):397
pubmed: 27535743
Aust Health Rev. 2010 Mar;34(1):73-9
pubmed: 20334761
BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):299-302
pubmed: 7633241
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Nov 1;33(9):988-998
pubmed: 30247571
Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):587-603
pubmed: 26794078
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Feb;58(2):107-12
pubmed: 15680740
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:28
pubmed: 25608947
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 4;16(2):e0246369
pubmed: 33539411
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jan;21(1):13-20
pubmed: 21835762
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 01;9:CD005186
pubmed: 28862335
Lancet. 2003 Oct 11;362(9391):1225-30
pubmed: 14568747
Lancet. 2005 Sep 17-23;366(9490):1026-35
pubmed: 16168785
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Feb;61:249-257
pubmed: 29272824
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Oct;25(19-20):2786-97
pubmed: 27273150
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;44(6):1879-88
pubmed: 26130739
JAMA. 1988 Sep 23-30;260(12):1743-8
pubmed: 3045356
BMC Womens Health. 2016 Jul 14;16:38
pubmed: 27418127
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Sep 30;11:243
pubmed: 21958353
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20741
pubmed: 21695115
Ghana Med J. 2013 Jun;47(2):57-63
pubmed: 23966740
BJOG. 2015 Jul;122(8):1045-9
pubmed: 25929823
J Nurs Manag. 2000 Jul;8(4):215-25
pubmed: 11309913
Health Policy Plan. 2013 May;28(3):237-46
pubmed: 22684639
Am J Infect Control. 2014 May;42(5):495-9
pubmed: 24656784
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Oct;107 Suppl 1:S113-21, S121-2
pubmed: 19815206
J Health Organ Manag. 2005;19(6):431-9
pubmed: 16375066
Implement Sci. 2016 Nov 18;11(1):150
pubmed: 27863498
Implement Sci. 2016 Mar 15;11:36
pubmed: 26979944
Epidemiol Rev. 2003;25:65-76
pubmed: 12923991
J Palliat Med. 2012 Apr;15(4):468-73
pubmed: 22500482
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061
pubmed: 34593508
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Mar;10(1):
pubmed: 33722879
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15 Suppl 2:S9
pubmed: 26391558
Glob Public Health. 2021 Jan;16(1):120-135
pubmed: 32657238
Lancet. 2013 May 18;381(9879):1747-55
pubmed: 23683641
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2004 Fall;24 Suppl 1:S31-7
pubmed: 15712775
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug 31;11:208
pubmed: 21878131

Auteurs

Mtisunge Joshua Gondwe (MJ)

Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK. mtisungejoshua@gmail.com.
Behaviour and Health Group, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust- Clinical Research Programme, PO Box 30096, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi. mtisungejoshua@gmail.com.

Emily Joshua (E)

Behaviour and Health Group, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust- Clinical Research Programme, PO Box 30096, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi.

Hendrina Kaliati (H)

Behaviour and Health Group, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust- Clinical Research Programme, PO Box 30096, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi.

Mamuda Aminu (M)

Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.

Stephen Allen (S)

Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.

Nicola Desmond (N)

Behaviour and Health Group, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust- Clinical Research Programme, PO Box 30096, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi.
Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH