A Practical Application of Genomic Predictions for Mastitis Resistance in Italian Holstein Heifers.
Holstein Friesian cattle
genomic index
genomic selection
heifer selection
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Sep 2022
11 Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
12
07
2022
revised:
06
09
2022
accepted:
07
09
2022
entrez:
23
9
2022
pubmed:
24
9
2022
medline:
24
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Heifers are a fundamental resource on farms, and their importance is reflected in both farm management and economy. Therefore, the selection of heifers to be reared on a farm should be carefully performed to select only the best animals. Genomic selection is available nowadays to evaluate animals in a fast and economic way. However, it is mainly used on the sire line and on performance traits. Ten farms were selected based on their 5-year records of average somatic cell count and evenly classified into high (>300,000 cells/mL) and low somatic cell count (<150,000 cells/mL). Genomic indexes (regarding both wellness and productive traits) were evaluated in 157 Italian Holstein heifers reared in the selected ten farms (90 from high-cells farms and 67 from low-cells ones). Linear mixed models were fitted to analyze the effects of the abovementioned genomic indexes on related phenotypes. Results have shown that farms classified into low somatic cell count had an overall better animal genomic pool compared to high somatic cell count ones. Additionally, the results shown in this study highlighted a difference in wellness genomic indexes in animals from farms with either a high or a low average somatic cell count. Applying genomic tools directly to heifer selection could improve economic aspects related to herd turnover.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36139231
pii: ani12182370
doi: 10.3390/ani12182370
pmc: PMC9494965
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Regione Piemonte
ID : NA
Références
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Feb;88(2):827-33
pubmed: 15653550
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 1;11(1):13642
pubmed: 34211046
Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2017 Mar 24;84(1):e1-e10
pubmed: 28397516
Animals (Basel). 2020 Dec 16;10(12):
pubmed: 33339148
J Proteomics. 2020 Jul 15;223:103815
pubmed: 32423885
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Nov;100(11):9115-9124
pubmed: 28865850
Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 01;11(2):
pubmed: 33535694
Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 25;11(3):
pubmed: 33668747
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Nov;99(11):9271-9286
pubmed: 27544856
Genetics. 2001 Apr;157(4):1819-29
pubmed: 11290733
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Apr;103(4):3828-3837
pubmed: 32037180
Prev Vet Med. 2006 Sep 15;76(1-2):74-89
pubmed: 16780974
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2018 Nov;34(3):457-472
pubmed: 30316503
J Theor Biol. 2020 Aug 7;498:110292
pubmed: 32333977
Int J Biometeorol. 2019 Sep;63(9):1265-1281
pubmed: 31129758
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jun;98(6):4148-61
pubmed: 25864048
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Jun;89(6):1896-905
pubmed: 16702253
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Dec;100(12):10381-10397
pubmed: 29153171
J R Soc Interface. 2017 Sep;14(134):
pubmed: 28904005