Expression of Nectin-4 in Variant Histologies of Bladder Cancer and Its Prognostic Value-Need for Biomarker Testing in High-Risk Patients?

Nectin-4 adjuvant therapy antibody–drug conjugate neoadjuvant therapy squamous cell carcinoma

Journal

Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Sep 2022
Historique:
received: 28 07 2022
revised: 04 09 2022
accepted: 08 09 2022
entrez: 23 9 2022
pubmed: 24 9 2022
medline: 24 9 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Variant histologies of bladder cancer (BC) often present with advanced tumor stage and the status of perioperative therapy is unclear. Thereby, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), adenocarcinoma (ADENO), and sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma (SARCO) are the most frequent variants. Nectin-4 has emerged as a highly interesting target in BC and might guide therapeutic application of antibody−drug conjugates (ADC). We therefore aimed to investigate expression patterns and prognostic value of Nectin-4 in variant histologies of BC. A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted of patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) for BC and revealed variant histologies of BC in the final specimens. Immunohistochemical staining for Nectin-4 was performed on tissue microarrays with 59 SCC, 22 ADENO, and 24 SARCO, and Nectin-4 expression was scored using the histochemical scoring system (H-score). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated by Kaplan−Meier method. Median expression of Nectin-4 was 150 (range 0−250) in SCC, 140.5 (range 30−275) in ADENO, and 10 (0−185) in SARCO, with significantly lower levels for SARCO compared to SCC or ADENO (p < 0.001). For SCC, ADENO or SARCO no differences regarding OS or PFS were observed based on Nectin-4 expression levels (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed nodal stage as an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS and metastases for PFS but not Nectin-4 expression. In conclusion, Nectin-4 was not prognostic in histological subtypes of BC in our study cohort. However, the high expression of Nectin-4 in SCC and ADENO might guide future treatment with novel Nectin-4-directed ADCs and provide this high-risk patient collective with a new promising therapeutic option. Testing Nectin-4 expression as a biomarker should be considered in trials with SARCO, where low Nectin-4 expression has been observed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36139571
pii: cancers14184411
doi: 10.3390/cancers14184411
pmc: PMC9497069
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Horst-Jürgen Lühl-Stiftung
ID : Severin Rodler

Références

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016 Jun;140(6):543-51
pubmed: 27031776
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2021 Sep 1;29(8):619-625
pubmed: 33901032
Eur Urol. 2022 Feb;81(2):138-142
pubmed: 34736796
World J Urol. 2021 Jul;39(7):2537-2543
pubmed: 33084922
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2021 Jul;21(7):863-873
pubmed: 34030536
Urol Oncol. 2021 Oct;39(10):619-622
pubmed: 34148797
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Sep 15;27(18):5123-5130
pubmed: 34108177
Nat Rev Urol. 2021 Apr;18(4):190
pubmed: 33692500
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jul 29;21(15):
pubmed: 32751328
Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):82-104
pubmed: 32360052
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct 10;37(29):2592-2600
pubmed: 31356140
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Mar 28;34:30
pubmed: 25888293
Am J Surg Pathol. 2011 May;35(5):e34-46
pubmed: 21490442
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Oct 26;22(21):
pubmed: 34768978
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Jul 15;6(4):653-663
pubmed: 31530497
Int J Urol. 2022 May 17;:
pubmed: 35581739
Eur Urol. 2022 Jan;81(1):95-103
pubmed: 34742583
N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 25;384(12):1125-1135
pubmed: 33577729
Nat Rev Urol. 2021 Feb;18(2):93-103
pubmed: 33239713
Am J Nephrol. 2007;27(6):590-604
pubmed: 17823505
Nat Rev Urol. 2017 Nov;14(11):651-668
pubmed: 28895563
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jun;22(6):872-882
pubmed: 33991512
Cancer Res. 2016 May 15;76(10):3003-13
pubmed: 27013195
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Oct;9(10):6565-6575
pubmed: 35117266

Auteurs

Severin Rodler (S)

Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Lennert Eismann (L)

Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Boris Schlenker (B)

Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Jozefina Casuscelli (J)

Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Isabel Brinkmann (I)

Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Andrea Sendelhofert (A)

Department of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Raphaela Waidelich (R)

Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Alexander Buchner (A)

Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Christian Stief (C)

Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Gerald Bastian Schulz (GB)

Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Stephan Ledderose (S)

Department of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Classifications MeSH