MRI-Guided Electrode Implantation for Chronic Intracerebral Recordings in a Rat Model of Post-Traumatic Epilepsy-Challenges and Gains.
cortical atrophy
hippocampal atrophy
intracerebral electrode
magnetic resonance imaging
posttraumatic epilepsy
traumatic brain injury
Journal
Biomedicines
ISSN: 2227-9059
Titre abrégé: Biomedicines
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101691304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Sep 2022
15 Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
08
08
2022
revised:
03
09
2022
accepted:
09
09
2022
entrez:
23
9
2022
pubmed:
24
9
2022
medline:
24
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Brain atrophy induced by traumatic brain injury (TBI) progresses in parallel with epileptogenesis over time, and thus accurate placement of intracerebral electrodes to monitor seizure initiation and spread at the chronic postinjury phase is challenging. We evaluated in adult male Sprague Dawley rats whether adjusting atlas-based electrode coordinates on the basis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) increases electrode placement accuracy and the effect of chronic electrode implantations on TBI-induced brain atrophy. One group of rats (EEG cohort) was implanted with two intracortical (anterior and posterior) and a hippocampal electrode right after TBI to target coordinates calculated using a rat brain atlas. Another group (MRI cohort) was implanted with the same electrodes, but using T2-weighted MRI to adjust the planned atlas-based 3D coordinates of each electrode. Histological analysis revealed that the anterior cortical electrode was in the cortex in 83% (25% in targeted layer V) of the EEG cohort and 76% (31%) of the MRI cohort. The posterior cortical electrode was in the cortex in 40% of the EEG cohort and 60% of the MRI cohort. Without MRI-guided adjustment of electrode tip coordinates, 58% of the posterior cortical electrodes in the MRI cohort will be in the lesion cavity, as revealed by simulated electrode placement on histological images. The hippocampal electrode was accurately placed in 82% of the EEG cohort and 86% of the MRI cohort. Misplacement of intracortical electrodes related to their rostral shift due to TBI-induced cortical and hippocampal atrophy and caudal retraction of the brain, and was more severe ipsilaterally than contralaterally (p < 0.001). Total lesion area in cortical subfields targeted by the electrodes (primary somatosensory cortex, visual cortex) was similar between cohorts (p > 0.05). MRI-guided adjustment of coordinates for electrodes improved the success rate of intracortical electrode tip placement nearly to that at the acute postinjury phase (68% vs. 62%), particularly in the posterior brain, which exhibited the most severe postinjury atrophy. Overall, MRI-guided electrode implantation improved the quality and interpretation of the origin of EEG-recorded signals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36140398
pii: biomedicines10092295
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10092295
pmc: PMC9496327
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : European Union
ID : FP7/2007-2013, n°602102 (EPITARGET)
Organisme : Academy of Finland
ID : 272249
Organisme : Academy of Finland
ID : 273909
Organisme : Academy of Finland
ID : 2285733-9
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U54NS100064 (EpiBioS4Rx)
Pays : United States
Organisme : Sigrid Jusélius Foundation
ID : Asla Pitkänen
Références
Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 Oct;6(10):537-50
pubmed: 20842185
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;90(11):1221-1233
pubmed: 31542723
J Neurosci Methods. 2018 Sep 1;307:37-45
pubmed: 29936072
Epilepsy Res. 2019 Feb;150:46-57
pubmed: 30641351
Epilepsia. 2016 May;57(5):735-45
pubmed: 27012461
Acta Neuropathol. 2005 Jun;109(6):603-16
pubmed: 15877231
Epilepsy Res. 2015 Nov;117:104-16
pubmed: 26432760
Epilepsia Open. 2016 Dec;1(3-4):86-101
pubmed: 28497130
J Neurosci Methods. 2018 Oct 1;308:330-336
pubmed: 30194043
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1972 Mar;32(3):281-94
pubmed: 4110397
J Mol Neurosci. 2021 Sep;71(9):1725-1742
pubmed: 33956297
Neurobiol Dis. 2019 Mar;123:115-121
pubmed: 29859872
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Jun;36(11):1890-1907
pubmed: 30543155
Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;127:45-66
pubmed: 25702209
N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 1;338(1):20-4
pubmed: 9414327
Epilepsia. 2021 Aug;62(8):1852-1864
pubmed: 34245005
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Oct;23(9):1509-15
pubmed: 12372740
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Dec 1;37(23):2580-2594
pubmed: 32349620
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Dec;38(23):3235-3247
pubmed: 33947273
Neuroscience. 2006 Jun 30;140(2):685-97
pubmed: 16650603
Epilepsia. 2009 Feb;50 Suppl 2:4-9
pubmed: 19187288
Neurotherapeutics. 2021 Jul;18(3):1582-1601
pubmed: 34595732
J Neurotrauma. 2014 Aug 15;31(16):1439-43
pubmed: 24693960
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;91(11):1637-40
pubmed: 21044706
Epilepsy Res. 2019 Oct;156:106110
pubmed: 30981541
Neuroinformatics. 2020 Apr;18(2):307-317
pubmed: 31802356
J Neurosci. 2001 Nov 1;21(21):8523-37
pubmed: 11606641
Neuroimage. 2009 Jan 1;44(1):1-8
pubmed: 18804539
Acta Neuropathol. 2002 Jun;103(6):607-14
pubmed: 12012093
Epilepsy Res. 2010 Jun;90(1-2):47-59
pubmed: 20435440
Front Neurol. 2022 Feb 17;13:820267
pubmed: 35250823
Exp Neurol. 2009 Jan;215(1):29-40
pubmed: 18929562
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Feb;14(2):128-42
pubmed: 23329160
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Apr;15(4):420-33
pubmed: 26925532
J Neurotrauma. 2005 Jan;22(1):42-75
pubmed: 15665602
Epilepsia. 2014 Apr;55(4):475-82
pubmed: 24730690
Micromachines (Basel). 2018 Aug 25;9(9):
pubmed: 30424363
Neuroscience. 1989;28(1):233-44
pubmed: 2761692
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Jan 15;34(2):459-474
pubmed: 26997032