Automatic Segmentation and Quantitative Assessment of Stroke Lesions on MR Images.
3D-UNet
automatic segmentation
deep neural networks
lesion studies
precision medicine
stroke
vascular neurology
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Aug 2022
24 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
27
07
2022
revised:
12
08
2022
accepted:
22
08
2022
entrez:
23
9
2022
pubmed:
24
9
2022
medline:
24
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lesion studies are crucial in establishing brain-behavior relationships, and accurately segmenting the lesion represents the first step in achieving this. Manual lesion segmentation is the gold standard for chronic strokes. However, it is labor-intensive, subject to bias, and limits sample size. Therefore, our objective is to develop an automatic segmentation algorithm for chronic stroke lesions on T1-weighted MR images. Methods: To train our model, we utilized an open-source dataset: ATLAS v2.0 (Anatomical Tracings of Lesions After Stroke). We partitioned the dataset of 655 T1 images with manual segmentation labels into five subsets and performed a 5-fold cross-validation to avoid overfitting of the model. We used a deep neural network (DNN) architecture for model training. Results: To evaluate the model performance, we used three metrics that pertain to diverse aspects of volumetric segmentation, including shape, location, and size. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) compares the spatial overlap between manual and machine segmentation. The average DSC was 0.65 (0.61−0.67; 95% bootstrapped CI). Average symmetric surface distance (ASSD) measures contour distances between the two segmentations. ASSD between manual and automatic segmentation was 12 mm. Finally, we compared the total lesion volumes and the Pearson correlation coefficient (ρ) between the manual and automatically segmented lesion volumes, which was 0.97 (p-value < 0.001). Conclusions: We present the first automated segmentation model trained on a large multicentric dataset. This model will enable automated on-demand processing of MRI scans and quantitative chronic stroke lesion assessment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36140457
pii: diagnostics12092055
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12092055
pmc: PMC9497525
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Jun 13;15:633-643
pubmed: 28664034
Med Image Anal. 2020 Aug;64:101713
pubmed: 32492582
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jul;19(7):1067-80
pubmed: 17583984
Front Neurol. 2020 Jan 24;11:15
pubmed: 32038472
Stroke. 2003 Feb;34(2):575-83
pubmed: 12574579
Stroke. 2016 Jan;47(1):66-73
pubmed: 26585396
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jun;51(7):1224-33
pubmed: 23566892
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2021 May-Jun;18(3):940-950
pubmed: 31502985
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006 Nov;25(11):1451-61
pubmed: 17117774
Stroke. 2020 Feb;51(2):594-600
pubmed: 31842700
Nat Neurosci. 2003 May;6(5):448-50
pubmed: 12704393
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Apr;36(4):1292-303
pubmed: 25423892
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;27:102276
pubmed: 32512401
Am Psychol. 2018 Feb-Mar;73(2):146-156
pubmed: 29481108
Neuron. 2016 Jun 15;90(6):1151-1153
pubmed: 27311080
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018 Jan;5(1):015006
pubmed: 29487883
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Oct;5(10):813-9
pubmed: 15378041
Sci Data. 2018 Feb 20;5:180011
pubmed: 29461514
J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Mar;10(2):167-77
pubmed: 9555105
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;25:102118
pubmed: 31865021
Sci Data. 2022 Jun 16;9(1):320
pubmed: 35710678
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Jan;43(1):129-148
pubmed: 32310331
Comput Biol Med. 2019 Dec;115:103487
pubmed: 31629272
Brain Struct Funct. 2016 May;221(4):2123-34
pubmed: 25939335
Neuron. 2012 Feb 9;73(3):415-34
pubmed: 22325196
IEEE Pulse. 2017 Jul-Aug;8(4):54-57
pubmed: 28715317
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Dec 1;40(17):4952-4964
pubmed: 31403237
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 10;21(6):
pubmed: 33802223
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Nov 1;40(16):4669-4685
pubmed: 31350795
J Big Data. 2021;8(1):101
pubmed: 34306963
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Jun 1;43(8):2707-2721
pubmed: 35142409
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1116-28
pubmed: 16545965
Insights Imaging. 2018 Aug;9(4):611-629
pubmed: 29934920
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 May 1;77(5):534-540
pubmed: 31774490
J Neurosci Methods. 2020 Mar 1;333:108575
pubmed: 31904391
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021 Feb;25(2):526-535
pubmed: 32750908