Forecasting admissions in psychiatric hospitals before and during Covid-19: a retrospective study with routine data.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 09 2022
23 09 2022
Historique:
received:
14
02
2022
accepted:
09
09
2022
entrez:
23
9
2022
pubmed:
24
9
2022
medline:
28
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic has strong effects on most health care systems. Forecasting of admissions can help for the efficient organisation of hospital care. We aimed to forecast the number of admissions to psychiatric hospitals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and we compared the performance of machine learning models and time series models. This would eventually allow to support timely resource allocation for optimal treatment of patients. We used admission data from 9 psychiatric hospitals in Germany between 2017 and 2020. We compared machine learning models with time series models in weekly, monthly and yearly forecasting before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 90,686 admissions were analysed. The models explained up to 90% of variance in hospital admissions in 2019 and 75% in 2020 with the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The best models substantially outperformed a one-step seasonal naïve forecast (seasonal mean absolute scaled error (sMASE) 2019: 0.59, 2020: 0.76). The best model in 2019 was a machine learning model (elastic net, mean absolute error (MAE): 7.25). The best model in 2020 was a time series model (exponential smoothing state space model with Box-Cox transformation, ARMA errors and trend and seasonal components, MAE: 10.44). Models forecasting admissions one week in advance did not perform better than monthly and yearly models in 2019 but they did in 2020. The most important features for the machine learning models were calendrical variables. Model performance did not vary much between different modelling approaches before the COVID-19 pandemic and established forecasts were substantially better than one-step seasonal naïve forecasts. However, weekly time series models adjusted quicker to the COVID-19 related shock effects. In practice, multiple individual forecast horizons could be used simultaneously, such as a yearly model to achieve early forecasts for a long planning period and weekly models to adjust quicker to sudden changes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36151267
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20190-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-20190-y
pmc: PMC9508170
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15912Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Process Saf Environ Prot. 2020 Sep;141:1-8
pubmed: 32501368
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Feb;15(2):159-70
pubmed: 18275446
Eur Geriatr Med. 2020 Jun;11(3):345-347
pubmed: 32328964
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Jun;11(2):133-137
pubmed: 33541855
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 18;21(1):9
pubmed: 33461485
Process Saf Environ Prot. 2021 May;149:223-233
pubmed: 33162687
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 23;9(12):
pubmed: 34946340
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Oct 20;114(42):705-711
pubmed: 29122102
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 9;11(4):e045276
pubmed: 33837103
Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(6):751-60
pubmed: 10916912
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2018 Nov 19;9(4):263-284
pubmed: 33354320
Health Serv Manage Res. 2010 Aug;23(3):116-20
pubmed: 20702888
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Nov;32(11):2013-20
pubmed: 24191094
Pharmacoecon Open. 2018 Sep;2(3):347-354
pubmed: 29623633
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184087
pubmed: 30646340
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1483-1488
pubmed: 32706956
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jan;16(1):1-10
pubmed: 19007346
Process Saf Environ Prot. 2021 May;149:399-409
pubmed: 33204052
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Feb 6;20(1):21
pubmed: 32028934
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;50(8):1309-15
pubmed: 25764478
N Engl J Med. 2002 May 30;346(22):1715-22
pubmed: 12037152