Genetic architecture of berry aroma compounds in a QTL (quantitative trait loci) mapping population of interspecific hybrid grapes (Vitis labruscana × Vitis vinifera).
Norisoprenoids
Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis
Secondary metabolism
Terpenoids
Vitis labruscana
Vitis vinifera
Volatile compounds
Journal
BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Sep 2022
23 Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
06
06
2022
accepted:
09
09
2022
entrez:
23
9
2022
pubmed:
24
9
2022
medline:
28
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although grapes accumulate diverse groups of volatile compounds, their genetic regulation in different cultivars remains unelucidated. Therefore, this study investigated the volatile composition in the berries of an interspecific hybrid population from a Vitis labruscana 'Campbell Early' (CE) × Vitis vinifera 'Muscat of Alexandria' (MA) cross to understand the relationship among volatile compounds and their genetic regulation. Then, a quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of its volatile compounds was conducted. While MA contained higher concentrations of monoterpenes and norisoprenoids, CE contained higher concentrations of C6 compounds, lactones and shikimic acid derivatives, including volatiles characteristic to American hybrids, i.e., methyl anthranilate, o-aminoacetophenone and mesifurane. Furthermore, a cluster analysis of volatile profiles in the hybrid population discovered ten coordinately modulated free and bound volatile clusters. QTL analysis identified a major QTL on linkage group (LG) 5 in the MA map for 14 monoterpene concentrations, consistent with a previously reported locus. Additionally, several QTLs detected in the CE map affected the concentrations of specific monoterpenes, such as linalool, citronellol and 1,8-cineol, modifying the monoterpene composition in the berries. As for the concentrations of five norisoprenoids, a major common QTL on LG2 was discovered first in this study. Several QTLs with minor effects were also discovered in various volatile groups, such as lactones, alcohols and shikimic acid derivatives. An overview of the profiles of aroma compounds and their underlying QTLs in a population of interspecific hybrid grapes in which muscat flavor compounds and many other aroma compounds were mixed variously were elucidated. Coordinate modulation of the volatile clusters in the hybrid population suggested an independent mechanism for controlling the volatiles of each group. Accordingly, specific QTLs with significant effects were observed for terpenoids, norisoprenoids and some volatiles highly contained in CE berries.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Although grapes accumulate diverse groups of volatile compounds, their genetic regulation in different cultivars remains unelucidated. Therefore, this study investigated the volatile composition in the berries of an interspecific hybrid population from a Vitis labruscana 'Campbell Early' (CE) × Vitis vinifera 'Muscat of Alexandria' (MA) cross to understand the relationship among volatile compounds and their genetic regulation. Then, a quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of its volatile compounds was conducted.
RESULTS
RESULTS
While MA contained higher concentrations of monoterpenes and norisoprenoids, CE contained higher concentrations of C6 compounds, lactones and shikimic acid derivatives, including volatiles characteristic to American hybrids, i.e., methyl anthranilate, o-aminoacetophenone and mesifurane. Furthermore, a cluster analysis of volatile profiles in the hybrid population discovered ten coordinately modulated free and bound volatile clusters. QTL analysis identified a major QTL on linkage group (LG) 5 in the MA map for 14 monoterpene concentrations, consistent with a previously reported locus. Additionally, several QTLs detected in the CE map affected the concentrations of specific monoterpenes, such as linalool, citronellol and 1,8-cineol, modifying the monoterpene composition in the berries. As for the concentrations of five norisoprenoids, a major common QTL on LG2 was discovered first in this study. Several QTLs with minor effects were also discovered in various volatile groups, such as lactones, alcohols and shikimic acid derivatives.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
An overview of the profiles of aroma compounds and their underlying QTLs in a population of interspecific hybrid grapes in which muscat flavor compounds and many other aroma compounds were mixed variously were elucidated. Coordinate modulation of the volatile clusters in the hybrid population suggested an independent mechanism for controlling the volatiles of each group. Accordingly, specific QTLs with significant effects were observed for terpenoids, norisoprenoids and some volatiles highly contained in CE berries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36151514
doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03842-z
pii: 10.1186/s12870-022-03842-z
pmc: PMC9503205
doi:
Substances chimiques
Lactones
0
Monoterpenes
0
Norisoprenoids
0
Terpenes
0
Volatile Organic Compounds
0
Shikimic Acid
29MS2WI2NU
Eucalyptol
RV6J6604TK
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
458Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Nature. 2007 Sep 27;449(7161):463-7
pubmed: 17721507
Hortic Res. 2019 Jul 1;6:81
pubmed: 31645942
Theor Appl Genet. 2009 Feb;118(3):541-52
pubmed: 19002427
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jan 31;22(3):
pubmed: 33572582
Theor Appl Genet. 2009 Feb;118(4):653-69
pubmed: 19037624
Biomolecules. 2019 Dec 03;9(12):
pubmed: 31816941
Breed Sci. 2016 Jan;66(1):34-45
pubmed: 27069389
BMC Plant Biol. 2015 Oct 06;15:240
pubmed: 26444528
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Dec 19;14:370
pubmed: 25524329
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 04;6:31116
pubmed: 27487935
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 May 19;14:137
pubmed: 24885290
J Hered. 2002 Jan-Feb;93(1):77-8
pubmed: 12011185
BMC Genomics. 2012 Jun 15;13:243
pubmed: 22702718
BMC Plant Biol. 2016 Mar 21;16:67
pubmed: 27001212
Curr Biol. 2017 Jul 10;27(13):1867-1877.e5
pubmed: 28625782
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015;55(2):202-18
pubmed: 24915400
J Sci Food Agric. 2019 Mar 15;99(4):1926-1937
pubmed: 30270444
J Agric Food Chem. 2010 Jun 9;58(11):6841-9
pubmed: 20450186
Food Chem. 2021 Aug 15;353:129484
pubmed: 33812162
J Agric Food Chem. 2017 Jan 18;65(2):383-393
pubmed: 28060498
BMC Plant Biol. 2010 Nov 09;10:241
pubmed: 21062440
BMC Plant Biol. 2010 Oct 21;10:226
pubmed: 20964856
Arch Biochem Biophys. 2009 Mar 15;483(2):236-45
pubmed: 19320050
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2005 Apr;69(4):773-7
pubmed: 15849416
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005 May;67(3):322-35
pubmed: 15635463
BMC Plant Biol. 2013 Oct 09;13:156
pubmed: 24106789
J Agric Food Chem. 2021 Feb 3;69(4):1413-1429
pubmed: 33481572