Systematic endoscopic staging of mediastinum to determine impact on radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer (SEISMIC): protocol for a prospective single arm multicentre interventional study.
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ diagnostic imaging
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
/ methods
Endosonography
/ methods
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Lymph Nodes
/ diagnostic imaging
Lymphatic Metastasis
/ pathology
Mediastinum
/ diagnostic imaging
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Neoplasm Staging
Prospective Studies
Bronchoscopy
Cancer staging
Carcinoma
Endoscopic ultrasonography
Non-small-cell lung
Journal
BMC pulmonary medicine
ISSN: 1471-2466
Titre abrégé: BMC Pulm Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968563
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Sep 2022
24 Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
13
06
2022
accepted:
14
09
2022
entrez:
24
9
2022
pubmed:
25
9
2022
medline:
28
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is established as the preferred method of mediastinal lymph node (LN) staging in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Selective (targeted) LN sampling is most commonly performed however studies in early stage NSCLC and locally advanced NSCLC confirm systematic EBUS-TBNA evaluation improves accuracy of mediastinal staging. This study aims to establish the rate of detection of positron emission tomography (PET)-occult LN metastases following systematic LN staging by EBUS-TBNA, and to determine the utility of systematic mediastinal staging for accurate delineation of radiation treatment fields in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. Consecutive patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA for diagnosis/staging of locally advanced NSCLC will be enrolled in this international multi-centre single arm study. Systematic mediastinal LN evaluation will be performed, with all LN exceeding 6 mm to be sampled by TBNA. Where feasible, endoscopic ultrasound staging (EUS-B) may also be performed. Results of minimally invasive staging will be compared to FDG-PET. The primary end-point is proportion of patients in whom systematic LN staging identified PET-occult NSCLC metastases. Secondary outcome measures include (i) rate of nodal upstaging, (ii) false positive rate of PET for mediastinal LN assessment, (iii) analysis of clinicoradiologic risk factors for presence of PET-occult LN metastases, (iv) impact of systematic LN staging in patients with discrepant findings on PET and EBUS-TBNA on target coverage and dose to organs at risk (OAR) in patients undergoing radiotherapy. With specificity of PET of 90%, guidelines recommend tissue confirmation of positive mediastinal LN to ensure potentially early stage patients are not erroneously denied potentially curative resection. However, while confirmation of pathologic LN is routinely sought, the exact extent of mediastinal LN involvement in NSCLC in patient with Stage III NSCLC is rarely established. Studies examining systematic LN staging in early stage NSCLC report a significant discordance between PET and EBUS-TBNA. In patients with locally advanced disease this has significant implications for radiation field planning, with risk of geographic miss in the event of PET-occult mediastinal LN metastases. The SEISMIC study will examine both diagnostic outcomes following systematic LN staging with EBUS-TBNA, and impact on radiation treatment planning. ACTRN12617000333314, ANZCTR, Registered on 3 March 2017.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is established as the preferred method of mediastinal lymph node (LN) staging in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Selective (targeted) LN sampling is most commonly performed however studies in early stage NSCLC and locally advanced NSCLC confirm systematic EBUS-TBNA evaluation improves accuracy of mediastinal staging. This study aims to establish the rate of detection of positron emission tomography (PET)-occult LN metastases following systematic LN staging by EBUS-TBNA, and to determine the utility of systematic mediastinal staging for accurate delineation of radiation treatment fields in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.
METHODS
METHODS
Consecutive patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA for diagnosis/staging of locally advanced NSCLC will be enrolled in this international multi-centre single arm study. Systematic mediastinal LN evaluation will be performed, with all LN exceeding 6 mm to be sampled by TBNA. Where feasible, endoscopic ultrasound staging (EUS-B) may also be performed. Results of minimally invasive staging will be compared to FDG-PET. The primary end-point is proportion of patients in whom systematic LN staging identified PET-occult NSCLC metastases. Secondary outcome measures include (i) rate of nodal upstaging, (ii) false positive rate of PET for mediastinal LN assessment, (iii) analysis of clinicoradiologic risk factors for presence of PET-occult LN metastases, (iv) impact of systematic LN staging in patients with discrepant findings on PET and EBUS-TBNA on target coverage and dose to organs at risk (OAR) in patients undergoing radiotherapy.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
With specificity of PET of 90%, guidelines recommend tissue confirmation of positive mediastinal LN to ensure potentially early stage patients are not erroneously denied potentially curative resection. However, while confirmation of pathologic LN is routinely sought, the exact extent of mediastinal LN involvement in NSCLC in patient with Stage III NSCLC is rarely established. Studies examining systematic LN staging in early stage NSCLC report a significant discordance between PET and EBUS-TBNA. In patients with locally advanced disease this has significant implications for radiation field planning, with risk of geographic miss in the event of PET-occult mediastinal LN metastases. The SEISMIC study will examine both diagnostic outcomes following systematic LN staging with EBUS-TBNA, and impact on radiation treatment planning.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ACTRN12617000333314, ANZCTR, Registered on 3 March 2017.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36153502
doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02159-9
pii: 10.1186/s12890-022-02159-9
pmc: PMC9509615
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
0Z5B2CJX4D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
364Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Chest. 2021 Apr;159(4):1642-1651
pubmed: 33393471
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):1-2
pubmed: 28973558
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Dec;4(12):960-968
pubmed: 27773666
Eur Respir J. 2019 May 9;53(5):
pubmed: 30819811
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Jul;14(7):1162-1168
pubmed: 28399376
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Apr;21(4):581-592
pubmed: 32171429
Eur Respir J. 2017 Nov 2;50(5):
pubmed: 29097432
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(8):e2488
pubmed: 26937894
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Sep-Oct;4(5):342-348
pubmed: 25194104
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 13;(11):CD009519
pubmed: 25393718
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jan 01;4(1):80-87
pubmed: 28973110
Chest. 2013 May;143(5 Suppl):e211S-e250S
pubmed: 23649440
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 May;45(5):787-98
pubmed: 24578407
ERJ Open Res. 2019 Jul 15;5(3):
pubmed: 31321223
Chest. 2021 Sep;160(3):1108-1120
pubmed: 33932466
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Aug;10(Suppl 22):S2682-S2685
pubmed: 30345105
Eur J Cancer. 2009 May;45(8):1389-96
pubmed: 19124238
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Mar;67(2):138-155
pubmed: 28140453
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2019 Jul;26(3):155-165
pubmed: 30119069
Respiration. 2020;99(6):508-515
pubmed: 32485718
Respirology. 2018 Jan;23(1):76-81
pubmed: 28857362
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jul;164(1):254-261.e1
pubmed: 35031139
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 May;103(5):1600-1605
pubmed: 28027732
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005 Apr;4(2):106-9
pubmed: 17670367
J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Mar;15(3):344-359
pubmed: 31731014
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2017 Apr;24(2):117-124
pubmed: 28005836
Lung Cancer. 2005 Jul;49(1):25-33
pubmed: 15949587
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Aug;106(2):398-403
pubmed: 29630875
Lung Cancer. 2020 Apr;142:9-12
pubmed: 32062200
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Aug;48(9):2894-2903
pubmed: 33547554
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Apr;127(1):1-5
pubmed: 29605476
Lung Cancer. 2017 Sep;111:124-130
pubmed: 28838382
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Nov;96(5):1756-60
pubmed: 23953728
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Aug;120(2):273-8
pubmed: 27291644
Eur Respir J. 2015 Jul;46(1):40-60
pubmed: 26034128