A comparison of two Fendrix hepatitis B vaccination schedules in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Fendrix
Hepatitis B
Inflammatory bowel disease
Vaccination
Journal
Vaccine
ISSN: 1873-2518
Titre abrégé: Vaccine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8406899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 10 2022
12 10 2022
Historique:
received:
06
10
2021
revised:
31
08
2022
accepted:
02
09
2022
pubmed:
27
9
2022
medline:
12
10
2022
entrez:
26
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Systemic immunosuppressive therapy (IS) renders patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) vulnerable to fulminant hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Seroprotection against HBV through a full vaccination scheme is preferably obtained before IS is initiated, but often conflicts with the clinical need to initiate therapy rapidly. Consequently, the vast majority of patients will use IS during booster vaccinations. In this retrospective cohort study, we examined the serological response after a modified vaccination schedule which includes an initial double dose of Fendrix in patients with IBD and compared the results with the serological responses of patients with IBD who received the standard schedule. Seroprotection rates were 86.2 % and 88.9 % in the modified and standard schedule groups respectively. One-third of patients obtained seroprotection after only one double dose vaccine. A double dose may be considered in patients with IBD at high short-term risk of HBV infection when a rapid protective response is warranted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36154758
pii: S0264-410X(22)01100-8
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.09.006
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fendrix
0
Hepatitis B Antibodies
0
Hepatitis B Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6201-6205Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.