Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography
Biliary drainage
Endoscopic ultrasound
Obstructive cholangiopathy
Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography
Journal
World journal of gastroenterology
ISSN: 2219-2840
Titre abrégé: World J Gastroenterol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100883448
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Jul 2022
21 Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
22
11
2021
revised:
21
01
2022
accepted:
23
06
2022
entrez:
26
9
2022
pubmed:
27
9
2022
medline:
28
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography is a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure that involves inserting a needle into the biliary tree, followed by the immediate insertion of a catheter. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is a novel technique that allows BD by echoendoscopy and fluoroscopy using a stent from the biliary tree to the gastrointestinal tract. To compare the technical aspects and outcomes of percutaneous transhepatic BD (PTBD) and EUS-BD. Different databases, including PubMed, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov, the Cochrane library, Scopus, and Google Scholar, were searched according to the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses to obtain studies comparing PTBD and EUS-BD. Among the six studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, PTBD patients underwent significantly more reinterventions (4.9 The findings of this systematic review revealed that EUS-BD is linked with a higher rate of effective BD and a more manageable procedure-related adverse event profile than PTBD. These findings highlight the evidence for successful EUS-BD implementation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography is a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure that involves inserting a needle into the biliary tree, followed by the immediate insertion of a catheter. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is a novel technique that allows BD by echoendoscopy and fluoroscopy using a stent from the biliary tree to the gastrointestinal tract.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
To compare the technical aspects and outcomes of percutaneous transhepatic BD (PTBD) and EUS-BD.
METHODS
METHODS
Different databases, including PubMed, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov, the Cochrane library, Scopus, and Google Scholar, were searched according to the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses to obtain studies comparing PTBD and EUS-BD.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among the six studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, PTBD patients underwent significantly more reinterventions (4.9
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The findings of this systematic review revealed that EUS-BD is linked with a higher rate of effective BD and a more manageable procedure-related adverse event profile than PTBD. These findings highlight the evidence for successful EUS-BD implementation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36158274
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3514
pmc: PMC9346459
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bilirubin
RFM9X3LJ49
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3514-3523Informations de copyright
©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Références
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Dec;72(6):1175-84, 1184.e1-3
pubmed: 20970787
Endoscopy. 2003 Dec;35(12):1076-8
pubmed: 14648424
Endoscopy. 2001 Oct;33(10):898-900
pubmed: 11571690
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Oct 21;14(39):6078-82
pubmed: 18932289
Cureus. 2018 Feb 26;10(2):e2228
pubmed: 29713573
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar 7;19(9):1372-9
pubmed: 23538784
Radiology. 1991 Jun;179(3):703-7
pubmed: 2027978
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct;46(9):768-74
pubmed: 22810111
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jul;60(1):138-42
pubmed: 15229448
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar-Apr;24(2):115-121
pubmed: 29637919
Clin Endosc. 2020 Jan;53(1):82-89
pubmed: 31476843
Am J Surg. 1985 Aug;150(2):243-7
pubmed: 2411158
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 May;21(5):328-34
pubmed: 24026963
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Feb;85(2):357-364
pubmed: 27566055
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Feb;60(2):557-65
pubmed: 25081224
Endosc Ultrasound. 2021 Sep-Oct;10(5):317-318
pubmed: 34677158
Lancet. 1994 Dec 17;344(8938):1655-60
pubmed: 7996958
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Dec;82(6):1110-5
pubmed: 26142558
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Feb 14;18(6):491-7
pubmed: 22363114
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):380-2
pubmed: 21185693
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Oct;41(10):1566-1572
pubmed: 29872897
Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Feb;43(2 Pt 1):102-6
pubmed: 8635700
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr 03;10:67-74
pubmed: 28408850
Am J Med Sci. 1967 Sep;254(3):316-21
pubmed: 6054533
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jul;14(7):1011-1019.e3
pubmed: 26748220
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct;49(9):764-70
pubmed: 25518004
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jan;59(1):100-7
pubmed: 14722561
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct;30(5):807-823
pubmed: 27931638
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan;83(1):160-5
pubmed: 26215648
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5500-5505
pubmed: 27129552
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep;101(9):2031-7
pubmed: 16968509
PLoS Med. 2013;10(4):e1001419
pubmed: 23585737
United European Gastroenterol J. 2013 Aug;1(4):285-93
pubmed: 24917973
Endoscopy. 2006 Sep;38(9):935-9
pubmed: 16981114
Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep 25;13(3):385-397
pubmed: 31616233
JOP. 2007 Jul 09;8(4):438-43
pubmed: 17625296
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Dec;80(6):1171
pubmed: 24830582
Pancreatology. 2011;11 Suppl 2:47-51
pubmed: 21464587
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Dec;72(3):412-7
pubmed: 18926655
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Apr;81(4):913-23
pubmed: 25484326