Current standard values of health utility scores for evaluating cost-effectiveness in liver disease: A meta-analysis.
EuroQOL 5-dimensions 5-levels
Health Utilities Index-Mark
Quality of life
RAND-36
Short from-36
Journal
World journal of gastroenterology
ISSN: 2219-2840
Titre abrégé: World J Gastroenterol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100883448
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Aug 2022
21 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
13
01
2022
revised:
26
04
2022
accepted:
24
07
2022
entrez:
26
9
2022
pubmed:
27
9
2022
medline:
28
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Health utility assessments have been developed for various conditions, including chronic liver disease. Health utility scores are required for socio-economic evaluations, which can aid the distribution of national budgets. However, the standard health utility assessment scores for specific health conditions are largely unknown. To summarize the health utility scores, including the EuroQOL 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L), EuroQol-visual analogue scale, short from-36 (SF-36), RAND-36, and Health Utilities Index (HUI)-Mark2/Mark3 scores, for the normal population and chronic liver disease patients. A systematic literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE, including the Cochrane Library, was performed. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan software. Multiple means and standard deviations were combined using the StatsToDo online web program. The EQ-5D-5L and SF-36 can be used for health utility evaluations during antiviral therapy for hepatitis C. HUI-Mark2/Mark3 indicated that the health utility scores of hepatitis B patients are roughly 30% better than those of hepatitis C patients. The EQ-5D-5L is the most popular questionnaire for health utility assessments. Health assessments that allow free registration would be useful for evaluating health utility in patients with liver disease.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Health utility assessments have been developed for various conditions, including chronic liver disease. Health utility scores are required for socio-economic evaluations, which can aid the distribution of national budgets. However, the standard health utility assessment scores for specific health conditions are largely unknown.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
To summarize the health utility scores, including the EuroQOL 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L), EuroQol-visual analogue scale, short from-36 (SF-36), RAND-36, and Health Utilities Index (HUI)-Mark2/Mark3 scores, for the normal population and chronic liver disease patients.
METHODS
METHODS
A systematic literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE, including the Cochrane Library, was performed. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan software. Multiple means and standard deviations were combined using the StatsToDo online web program.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The EQ-5D-5L and SF-36 can be used for health utility evaluations during antiviral therapy for hepatitis C. HUI-Mark2/Mark3 indicated that the health utility scores of hepatitis B patients are roughly 30% better than those of hepatitis C patients.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The EQ-5D-5L is the most popular questionnaire for health utility assessments. Health assessments that allow free registration would be useful for evaluating health utility in patients with liver disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36159009
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i31.4442
pmc: PMC9453766
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antiviral Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4442-4455Informations de copyright
©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors have nothing to disclose.
Références
Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691-729
pubmed: 16279964
BMJ. 1993 May 29;306(6890):1437-40
pubmed: 8518639
PLoS One. 2019 May 9;14(5):e0215764
pubmed: 31071105
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Feb 5;20(1):44
pubmed: 32024479
Gut. 2006 Sep;55(9):1332-8
pubmed: 15994216
Liver Int. 2021 Nov;41(11):2611-2621
pubmed: 34219359
BMJ. 2001 May 19;322(7296):1240-3
pubmed: 11358783
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Dec 04;12:2593-2603
pubmed: 30584283
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Aug;26(8):1093.e5-1093.e8
pubmed: 32353413
Qual Life Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):647-673
pubmed: 33284428
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(7):878-87
pubmed: 19437190
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Feb;96(2):579-83
pubmed: 11232711
Qual Life Res. 2017 Feb;26(2):349-357
pubmed: 27534773
Hepatol Res. 2018 Jun;48(7):509-520
pubmed: 29316059
Liver Transpl. 2002 Mar;8(3):263-70
pubmed: 11910572
Br Med Bull. 2010;96:5-21
pubmed: 21037243
J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Mar;37(2):128-38
pubmed: 24559417
Gastroenterology. 2006 Aug;131(2):478-84
pubmed: 16890602
ACS Cent Sci. 2021 Apr 28;7(4):508-509
pubmed: 34056081
J Hepatol. 2013 Mar;58(3):460-6
pubmed: 23149064
Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337-43
pubmed: 11491192
Health Econ. 1993 Oct;2(3):217-27
pubmed: 8275167
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Mar;98(3):630-8
pubmed: 12650799
Qual Life Res. 2013 Sep;22(7):1707-16
pubmed: 23192232
Liver Int. 2009 Mar;29(3):449-58
pubmed: 19267865
Liver Int. 2007 Oct;27(8):1119-25
pubmed: 17845541
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Dec;67(12):1056-1061
pubmed: 31098867
Liver Int. 2020 Nov;40(11):2630-2642
pubmed: 32851764
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;30(9):801-806
pubmed: 31530524
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;5(12):1749-1768
pubmed: 31560378
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
pubmed: 1593914
Liver Transpl. 2008 Mar;14(3):321-6
pubmed: 18306356
Lancet. 2019 Apr 6;393(10179):1392-1394
pubmed: 30765125
Qual Life Res. 2016 Mar;25(3):707-19
pubmed: 26303761
World J Clin Cases. 2018 Nov 6;6(13):589-599
pubmed: 30430114