Outcomes of Closed versus Open Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review.
cosmetic techniques
nasal surgical procedures
reconstructive surgical procedures
rhinoplasty
Journal
Archives of plastic surgery
ISSN: 2234-6163
Titre abrégé: Arch Plast Surg
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101577999
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
01
01
2022
accepted:
18
04
2022
entrez:
26
9
2022
pubmed:
27
9
2022
medline:
27
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Open and closed rhinoplasty are two main approaches to perform nasal modifications. According to current literature, there is no current consensus among plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists on which technique is preferred in terms of aesthetic result, complications, and patient satisfaction. This study uses published research to determine whether open or closed rhinoplasty leads to superior patient outcomes. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for systematic reviews were followed and a literature search was conducted in four databases based on our search strategy. Articles were then imported into COVIDENCE where they underwent primary screening and full-text review. Twenty articles were selected in this study after 243 articles were screened. There were 4 case series, 12 retrospective cohort studies, 1 prospective cohort study, 1 case-control, and 2 outcomes research. There were three cosmetic studies, eight functional studies, and nine studies that included both cosmetic and functional components. Sixteen studies utilized both open and closed rhinoplasty and four utilized open rhinoplasty. Both techniques demonstrated high patient and provider satisfaction and no advantage was found between techniques. Based on available studies, we cannot conclude if there is a preference between open or closed rhinoplasty in terms of which technique leads to better patient outcomes. Several studies determined that open rhinoplasty and closed rhinoplasty leads to comparative patient satisfaction. To make outcome reporting more reliable and uniform among studies, authors should look to utilize the Nasal Obstruction and Septoplasty Effectiveness scale and the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36159386
doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756315
pii: 22007
pmc: PMC9507448
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
569-579Informations de copyright
The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest None declared.
Références
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 May;109(6):2087-96
pubmed: 11994619
Arch Plast Surg. 2012 May;39(3):209-15
pubmed: 22783528
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 May;119(6):1903-1910
pubmed: 17440373
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2002 May-Jun;26(3):161-6
pubmed: 12140692
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Oct;27(7):1707-1710
pubmed: 27748725
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Mar 19;6(3):e1615
pubmed: 29707440
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Mar;53(1):4-9
pubmed: 29391969
Mol Syndromol. 2019 Feb;10(1-2):83-97
pubmed: 30976282
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jul;144(1):102e-117e
pubmed: 31246835
Laryngoscope. 2012 Feb;122(2):254-9
pubmed: 22252921
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987 Aug;80(2):161-74
pubmed: 3602167
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Jan;56(1):74-83
pubmed: 29989835
Ann Plast Surg. 2008 Nov;61(5):527-32
pubmed: 18948780
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Oct;114(5):1298-308; discussion 1309-12
pubmed: 15457053
Ann Plast Surg. 2018 May;80(5):468-471
pubmed: 29537996
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Aug;72(8):1347-1354
pubmed: 31078414
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2021 Sep;23(5):368-374
pubmed: 33798400
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jul;26(5):e430-3
pubmed: 26167997
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jan;11(1):PC05-PC07
pubmed: 28273999
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990 Jun;85(6):955-60
pubmed: 2190249
Aesthet Surg J. 2006 Jul-Aug;26(4):456-9
pubmed: 19338931
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;9(2):82-6
pubmed: 17372060
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Mar;109(3):1128-46; quiz 1145-6
pubmed: 11884847
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Oct;110(5):1240-6; discussion 1247-8
pubmed: 12360061
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;6:Doc09
pubmed: 22073085
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2008 Oct 03;8:6
pubmed: 18831771
Aesthet Surg J. 2011 Mar;31(3):297-301
pubmed: 21385740
J Craniofac Surg. 2021 May 1;32(3):868-873
pubmed: 33038179
Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Oct;36(9):983-92
pubmed: 27651480
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Jul 27;8(7):e3001
pubmed: 32802685
Ann Plast Surg. 2006 Sep;57(3):252-4
pubmed: 16929188
Ear Nose Throat J. 2016 Feb;95(2):E18-21
pubmed: 26930338
Turk J Med Sci. 2016 Feb 17;46(2):287-90
pubmed: 27511486
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;6:Doc08
pubmed: 22073084