No evidence for widespread positive selection on double substitutions within codons in primates and yeasts.
double substitutions
natural selection
negative selection
neutral evolution
positive selection
purifying selection
short-term evolution
tandem mutations
Journal
Frontiers in genetics
ISSN: 1664-8021
Titre abrégé: Front Genet
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560621
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
11
07
2022
accepted:
29
08
2022
entrez:
26
9
2022
pubmed:
27
9
2022
medline:
27
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nucleotide substitutions in protein-coding genes can be divided into synonymous (S) and non-synonymous (N) ones that alter amino acids (including nonsense mutations causing stop codons). The S substitutions are expected to have little effect on function. The N substitutions almost always are affected by strong purifying selection that eliminates them from evolving populations. However, additional mutations of nearby bases can modulate the deleterious effect of single N substitutions and, thus, could be subjected to the positive selection. This effect has been demonstrated for mutations in the serine codons, stop codons and double N substitutions in prokaryotes. In all abovementioned cases, a novel technique was applied that allows elucidating the effects of selection on double substitutions considering mutational biases. Here, we applied the same technique to study double N substitutions in eukaryotic lineages of primates and yeast. We identified markedly fewer cases of purifying selection relative to prokaryotes and no evidence of codon double substitutions under positive selection. This is consistent with previous studies of serine codons in primates and yeast. In general, the obtained results strongly suggest that there are major differences between studied pro- and eukaryotes; double substitutions in primates and yeasts largely reflect mutational biases and are not hallmarks of selection. This is especially important in the context of detection of positive selection in codons because it has been suggested that multiple mutations in codons cause false inferences of lineage-specific site positive selection. It is likely that this concern is applicable to previously studied prokaryotes but not to primates and yeasts where markedly fewer double substitutions are affected by positive selection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36159983
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.991249
pii: 991249
pmc: PMC9500374
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
991249Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Belinky, Bykova, Yurchenko and Rogozin.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Mar;10(3):195-205
pubmed: 19204717
Genome Res. 2014 Sep;24(9):1445-54
pubmed: 25079859
Genome Biol. 2005;6(9):R75
pubmed: 16168082
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D574-80
pubmed: 26578574
Semin Cell Biol. 1990 Feb;1(1):1-9
pubmed: 1983265
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Feb 1;41(4):2073-94
pubmed: 23293005
Sci Rep. 2011;1:40
pubmed: 22355559
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Feb;2(2):237-240
pubmed: 29292397
G3 (Bethesda). 2017 Mar 10;7(3):967-981
pubmed: 28122952
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Jun;30(6):1315-25
pubmed: 23447710
Biol Direct. 2014 Dec 12;9:29
pubmed: 25496919
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Apr 27;365(1544):1153-67
pubmed: 20308090
Curr Biol. 2011 Jun 21;21(12):1051-4
pubmed: 21636278
Genome Biol. 2006;7(6):R45
pubmed: 16780599
Nature. 2004 Jun 3;429(6991):558-62
pubmed: 15175752
Science. 2000 Feb 18;287(5456):1283-6
pubmed: 10678838
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Aug;2(8):1280-1288
pubmed: 29967485
J Mol Biol. 1998 Aug 7;281(1):31-48
pubmed: 9680473
PLoS Genet. 2017 Jul 13;13(7):e1006780
pubmed: 28704371
PLoS Genet. 2016 Nov 15;12(11):e1006315
pubmed: 27846220
Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2007 Jul-Aug;42(4):247-58
pubmed: 17687667
Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Aug;27(8):1912-22
pubmed: 20231333
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 15;113(46):13109-13113
pubmed: 27799560
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013 Feb;20(2):237-43
pubmed: 23262490
Genetics. 2001 Sep;159(1):347-58
pubmed: 11560910
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Sep 6;102(36):12849-54
pubmed: 16118275
BMC Biol. 2019 Dec 16;17(1):105
pubmed: 31842858
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 15;104 Suppl 1:8597-604
pubmed: 17494740
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Feb;24(2):374-81
pubmed: 17101719
PLoS Genet. 2013 May;9(5):e1003527
pubmed: 23737754
Physiol Rev. 1999 Apr;79(2):425-49
pubmed: 10221986
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jan 20;33(2):511-8
pubmed: 15661851
J Mol Biol. 2005 Nov 4;353(4):911-23
pubmed: 16198373
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2012 Dec;53(9):777-86
pubmed: 22965922
Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Oct;29(10):3037-44
pubmed: 22490819
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 18;8(1):9260
pubmed: 29915293