Critical reflection on required service to the community propels prospective medical students toward higher empathy, compassion, and bias mitigation but are these gains sustainable?
bias mitigation
cognitive empathy
compassion
critical reflection
dissonance reconciliation
healthcare curricula
self-examination
service-learning
Journal
Frontiers in medicine
ISSN: 2296-858X
Titre abrégé: Front Med (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648047
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
23
06
2022
accepted:
25
08
2022
entrez:
26
9
2022
pubmed:
27
9
2022
medline:
27
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We observed increased cognitive empathy and reflective capacity scores when prospective medical students wrote critical reflections on mandatory team service-learning in a Medical Humanities course, but these findings did not include a control group. Here we compare these survey results in similar courses with and without required service-learning. Forty-three prospective medical students completed a Medical Humanities course requiring critical reflection on team service-learning. In comparison, 32 students finished a similar course in which service to the community was not mandatory. Before starting the courses, students completed reliable surveys of their cognitive empathy and reflective capacity, and more than 93% of the students completed the same surveys after finishing the courses. Students' cognitive empathy and reflective capacity scores increased significantly when service-learning was required, but the scores did not increase significantly when service to the community was not required. The effect size for the empathy increase was of crucial practical importance ( These and prior findings strongly support the conclusion that students' critical reflection on mandatory team service-learning fosters development of their cognitive empathy and reflective capacity. We present a model program to incorporate critical reflection on service to the community throughout the curricula of all healthcare professions trainees.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36160142
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.976863
pmc: PMC9500161
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
976863Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Van Winkle, Thornock, Schwartz, Horst, Fisher and Michels.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:477-501
pubmed: 35020445
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Mar 1;18(1):19
pubmed: 28249596
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 25;17(7):
pubmed: 32218103
Evid Based Dent. 2019 Dec;20(4):101-102
pubmed: 31863040
Med Teach. 2007 Mar;29(2-3):177-82
pubmed: 17701630
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2019 Jan;4(1):19-28
pubmed: 30931761
Acad Med. 2020 May;95(5):717-723
pubmed: 31977339
Am J Public Health. 2015 Dec;105(12):e60-76
pubmed: 26469668
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 16;16(20):
pubmed: 31623072
Acad Med. 2009 May;84(5):582-6
pubmed: 19704190
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196545
pubmed: 31276177
Acad Med. 2021 Jul 1;96(7):1057-1070
pubmed: 33830949
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Aug 10;75(6):109
pubmed: 21931447
Acad Med. 2019 Nov;94(11):1774-1780
pubmed: 31149924
Science. 2017 Jun 30;356(6345):1341
pubmed: 28663463
J Interprof Care. 2015 May;29(3):238-44
pubmed: 25311270
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 08;8:758377
pubmed: 34820397
Acad Med. 2021 Dec 1;96(12):1634-1637
pubmed: 34591035
Acad Med. 2016 Jun;91(6):865-88
pubmed: 26703415
BMC Med Educ. 2021 May 22;21(1):292
pubmed: 34020647
Front Public Health. 2017 Dec 11;5:339
pubmed: 29322041
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Oct 14;77(8):169
pubmed: 24159210
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 02;18(9):
pubmed: 34063219
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Feb 7;19(1):47
pubmed: 30732611
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Jul;57(3):505-523
pubmed: 29453778
Med J Aust. 2009 Oct 19;191(8):441-4
pubmed: 19835538
Med Teach. 2015;37(6):566-71
pubmed: 25189277