Cover crop influence on pore size distribution and biopore dynamics: Enumerating root and soil faunal effects.
X-ray CT
biopores
cover crops
macropores
pore structure
soil structure
Journal
Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
25
04
2022
accepted:
05
08
2022
entrez:
26
9
2022
pubmed:
27
9
2022
medline:
27
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pore structure is a key determinant of soil functioning, and both root growth and activity of soil fauna are modified by and interact with pore structure in multiple ways. Cover cropping is a rapidly growing popular strategy for improving agricultural sustainability, including improvements in pore structure. However, since cover crop species encompass a variety of contrasting root architectures, they can have disparate effects on formation of soil pores and their characteristics, thus on the pore structure formation. Moreover, utilization of the existing pore systems and its modification by new root growth, in conjunction with soil fauna activity, can also vary by cover crop species, affecting the dynamics of biopores (creation and demolition). The objectives of this study were (i) to quantify the influence of 5 cover crop species on formation and size distribution of soil macropores (>36 μm Ø); (ii) to explore the changes in the originally developed pore architecture after an additional season of cover crop growth; and (iii) to assess the relative contributions of plant roots and soil fauna to fate and modifications of biopores. Intact soil cores were taken from 5 to 10 cm depth after one season of cover crop growth, followed by X-ray computed micro-tomography (CT) characterization, and then, the cores were reburied for a second root growing period of cover crops to explore subsequent changes in pore characteristics with the second CT scanning. Our data suggest that interactions of soil fauna and roots with pore structure changed over time. While in the first season, large biopores were created at the expense of small pores, in the second year these biopores were reused or destroyed by the creation of new ones through earthworm activities and large root growth. In addition, the creation of large biopores (>0.5 mm) increased total macroporosity. During the second root growing period, these large sized macropores, however, are reduced in size again through the action of soil fauna smaller than earthworms, suggesting a highly dynamic equilibrium. Different effects of cover crops on pore structure mainly arise from their differences in root volume, mean diameter as well as their reuse of existing macropores.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36160999
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.928569
pmc: PMC9491155
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
928569Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Lucas, Nguyen, Guber and Kravchenko.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Opt Express. 2009 May 11;17(10):8567-91
pubmed: 19434191
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 7;9(1):16236
pubmed: 31700059
Plant Methods. 2021 Apr 8;17(1):39
pubmed: 33832482
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 28;12(7):e0181872
pubmed: 28753645
Bioinformatics. 2016 Nov 15;32(22):3532-3534
pubmed: 27412086
Plant Cell Environ. 2020 Jan;43(1):235-245
pubmed: 31600410
Trends Plant Sci. 2017 Oct;22(10):823-829
pubmed: 28803694
AoB Plants. 2021 Sep 13;13(6):plab056
pubmed: 34804466
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Jan;29(1):196-205
pubmed: 19923044
Plant Soil. 2014;380(1-2):133-151
pubmed: 25834289
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Oct;26(10):5382-5403
pubmed: 32692435
Front Neuroinform. 2014 Jan 16;7:50
pubmed: 24474917
Bioinformatics. 2013 Jul 15;29(14):1840-1
pubmed: 23681123
Nat Methods. 2019 Dec;16(12):1226-1232
pubmed: 31570887
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 1;574:1283-1293
pubmed: 27712865
PeerJ. 2014 Jun 19;2:e453
pubmed: 25024921
J Stat Softw. 2018 Aug;86:
pubmed: 30288153
Sci Rep. 2019 May 16;9(1):7473
pubmed: 31097750
Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Feb;33(2):133-48
pubmed: 19895403
J Exp Bot. 2021 Feb 2;72(2):747-756
pubmed: 33064808