Improving health across sectors: Best practices for the implementation of health in all policies approaches.
Communications
Cross-sector
Flexibility
Health in All Policies
Journal
Preventive medicine reports
ISSN: 2211-3355
Titre abrégé: Prev Med Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101643766
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
21
03
2022
revised:
24
08
2022
accepted:
25
08
2022
entrez:
26
9
2022
pubmed:
27
9
2022
medline:
27
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Health is influenced by a broad range of factors beyond the typical remit of public health. It is therefore increasingly recognized that multiple sectors need to be engaged to improve population health. Health in All Policies (HiAP) is an approach to systematically consider health across policies and programs. This study assessed best practices and gaps in HiAP operationalization to inform practitioners aiming to incorporate HiAP in their work. We used Delaware as a model state to examine operationalization factors in a jurisdiction planning to implement HiAP. Methods included document review, key informant interviews, focus groups, and a questionnaire conducted in Delaware and virtually. Thematic analysis was used to analyze qualitative data to provide information on best practices and gaps in existing HiAP programs and context in Delaware. Descriptive statistics were used to examine collaboration in Delaware and to support or refute qualitative findings. We identified two gaps that can hinder HiAP implementation: 1) HiAP practitioners do not adequately use strategic communications to increase buy-in across sectors; 2) practitioners do not fully recognize the importance of being adaptable throughout HiAP implementation, which hinders sustainability. Qualitative findings from Delaware offer insight to these gaps and opportunities to address them. Refining the essential elements of HiAP to add: 1) strategic communications across sectors and 2) flexibility throughout HiAP implementation may point the way to more successful adoption of HiAP approaches across jurisdictions. This research demonstrated the importance of examining local perspectives on HiAP before implementation based on a jurisdiction's context.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36161110
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101961
pii: S2211-3355(22)00268-6
pmc: PMC9501991
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101961Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Feb;50(2):129-35
pubmed: 26526164
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2014 Sep 1;1(3):149-164
pubmed: 25984439
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021 Jan/Feb;27(1):94-96
pubmed: 33239530
Health Policy Plan. 2015 May;30(4):462-73
pubmed: 24816571
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907
pubmed: 29937585
Int J Behav Healthc Res. 2011 Oct;2(4):320-332
pubmed: 25383095
Cureus. 2020 Apr 4;12(4):e7541
pubmed: 32377489
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 23;10(1):20367
pubmed: 33230234
Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2012;8(1):23-34
pubmed: 22833776
Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:369-402
pubmed: 10884958