Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures and Their Surgical Outcomes Between 2011 and 2021: A Single-Centre Observational Study.
complex trauma and reconstruction surgery
femoral fracture
operative complications
periprosthetic fracture
revision hip and knee surgery
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Aug 2022
Historique:
accepted:
23
08
2022
entrez:
28
9
2022
pubmed:
29
9
2022
medline:
29
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Introduction Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) present a significant burden on the health service. The incidence continues to rise globally as a result of an ageing population and an increase in the number of primary hip and knee arthroplasties being performed. This is a 10-year, retrospective, observational study that aims to better understand the outcomes of PFF in our district general hospital. Materials and methods We identified the demographic information of patients who had a PFF and looked at how the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, time to operation, length of stay, complications, and mortality data vary depending on where the fracture is sited and the operative management employed. Results During the period between January 2011 and March 2021, we identified 214 cases of PFF. The mean age was 82.5 years with a female preponderance of 76%. Between 2011-2016 and 2017-2021, the number of cases of PFF increased and patients with an ASA score of 3 or more increased from 43% to 73%. Length of stay was longer in the proximal PFF revision group than in the proximal PFF fixation group. Overall PFF mortality rates at 30 days, 90 days, and one year were 6%, 10%, and 15%, respectively. Conclusion Over the 10-year period, there was a significant increase in the incidence of patients presenting with PFF with multiple comorbidities. Mortality rates were lower in proximal PFF patients who underwent revision procedures rather than fixation. The patient demographics, complication rates, and mortality rates were comparable to similar studies across different countries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36168348
doi: 10.7759/cureus.28341
pmc: PMC9504806
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e28341Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022, Baggott et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 10;10(12):e042371
pubmed: 33303466
Injury. 2019 Feb;50(2):438-443
pubmed: 30482411
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019 Sep 24;10:2151459319876859
pubmed: 31579528
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Jan;27(1):107-112
pubmed: 27600334
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Oct;140(10):1381-1394
pubmed: 32086558
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020 Mar;102(3):229-231
pubmed: 31789583
Bone Joint J. 2014 Jun;96-B(6):713-6
pubmed: 24891568
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jan;93(1):96-101
pubmed: 21196551
Surgeon. 2020 Feb;18(1):19-23
pubmed: 31196725
Injury. 2013 Jun;44(6):757-62
pubmed: 23103113
Bone Joint J. 2016 Apr;98-B(4):461-7
pubmed: 27037427
Injury. 2005 Mar;36(3):424-9
pubmed: 15710161
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 May;104(3):363-367
pubmed: 29458200
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Apr 4;100(7):578-585
pubmed: 29613927