The G-NORM Scale: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Gender Norms Scale.
gender norms
measurement
scale development
social norms
Journal
Sex roles
ISSN: 0360-0025
Titre abrégé: Sex Roles
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7511805
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
26
08
2021
revised:
10
08
2022
accepted:
12
08
2022
entrez:
28
9
2022
pubmed:
29
9
2022
medline:
29
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Gender norms are increasingly recognized as important modifiers of health. Despite growing awareness of how gender norms affect health behavior, current gender norms scales are often missing two important theoretical components: differentiating between descriptive and injunctive norms and adding a referent group. We used a mixed-methods approach to develop and validate a novel gender norms scale that includes both theoretical components. Based on qualitative data, the theory of normative social behavior, and the theory of gender and power, we generated a pool of 28 items. We included the items in a baseline questionnaire among 3,110 women in Odisha, India as part of a cluster randomized controlled trial. We then ran exploratory factor analysis which resulted in 18 items. Using a second wave of data with the same sample, we evaluated psychometric properties using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. The analysis resulted in two subscales with nine items each, "descriptive gender norms" and "injunctive gender norms." Both subscales represent high internal validity with Cronbach's alpha values of 0.81 and 0.84 and the combined scale has an alpha of 0.87. The G-NORM, gender norms scale, improves on existing measures by providing distinct descriptive and injunctive norms subscales and moving beyond individual attitudes by assessing women's perceptions of community-level gender norms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36168556
doi: 10.1007/s11199-022-01319-9
pii: 1319
pmc: PMC9508194
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
350-363Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest/Competing InterestsThe authors have no conflict of interest to report.
Références
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jul 26;10:438
pubmed: 20659344
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jun;74(11):1675-83
pubmed: 21764489
Nutrition. 2021 Jun;86:111159
pubmed: 33636419
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 15;18(1):163
pubmed: 29764385
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):457
pubmed: 32252698
Prev Sci. 2007 Sep;8(3):206-13
pubmed: 17549635
SSM Popul Health. 2018 Oct 31;7:014-14
pubmed: 30581959
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 7;20(1):203
pubmed: 32033546
Cult Health Sex. 2008 Apr;10(3):297-306
pubmed: 18432428
SSM Popul Health. 2019 Nov 20;9:100480
pubmed: 31993481
Psychol Methods. 2002 Jun;7(2):147-77
pubmed: 12090408
Stud Fam Plann. 2014 Mar;45(1):19-41
pubmed: 24615573
Cult Health Sex. 2013;15(6):637-51
pubmed: 23406345
Matern Child Health J. 2013 Jul;17(5):837-41
pubmed: 22696106
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Dec;72(6):558-569
pubmed: 31304696
Sociol Health Illn. 2020 Feb;42(2):407-422
pubmed: 31833073
Gates Open Res. 2018 Mar 20;2:15
pubmed: 29683135
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Nov;53(5):617-22
pubmed: 23768462
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Feb 11;14:21
pubmed: 24512206
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Sep;51(6):931-9
pubmed: 10972436