From pathology to MRI and back: Clinically relevant biomarkers of multiple sclerosis lesions.
Central vein sign
Cortical lesions
MRI-pathology correlations
Multiple sclerosis
Paramagnetic rim lesions
Remyelination
Journal
NeuroImage. Clinical
ISSN: 2213-1582
Titre abrégé: Neuroimage Clin
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101597070
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
31
03
2022
revised:
07
09
2022
accepted:
09
09
2022
pubmed:
29
9
2022
medline:
15
12
2022
entrez:
28
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Focal lesions in both white and gray matter are characteristic of multiple sclerosis (MS). Histopathological studies have helped define the main underlying pathological processes involved in lesion formation and evolution, serving as a gold standard for many years. However, histopathology suffers from an intrinsic bias resulting from over-reliance on tissue samples from late stages of the disease or atypical cases and is inadequate for routine patient assessment. Pathological-radiological correlative studies have established advanced MRI's sensitivity to several relevant MS-pathological substrates and its practicality for assessing dynamic changes and following lesions over time. This review focuses on novel imaging techniques that serve as biomarkers of critical pathological substrates of MS lesions: the central vein, chronic inflammation, remyelination and repair, and cortical lesions. For each pathological process, we address the correlative value of MRI to MS pathology, its contribution in elucidating MS pathology in vivo, and the clinical utility of the imaging biomarker.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36170753
pii: S2213-1582(22)00259-5
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103194
pmc: PMC9668624
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103194Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.