The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal loss among Italian couples: A mixed-method study.
COVID-19
mixed-method research design
pandemic
perinatal grief
psychological support
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
26
04
2022
accepted:
04
08
2022
entrez:
29
9
2022
pubmed:
30
9
2022
medline:
30
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Perinatal bereavement is an event that greatly impacts the emotional, psychological, and psychosocial aspects of those who want to have a child. Since there are few studies on the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on couples grieving for perinatal loss, this research aimed to survey this experience. Between 2020 and 2021, in Italian provinces highly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, 21 parents participated: 16 mothers (76%; mean age 36.2; SD: 3.1) and 5 fathers (24%; mean age 40.2; SD: 3.4), among which there were 4 couples. A mixed-method design was used through self-report questionnaires and in-depth interviews. Accompanied by a sociodemographic form, the following questionnaires were administered: Prolonged Grief-13, the Parental Assessment of Paternal Affectivity (PAPA) (to fathers), the Parental Assessment of Maternal Affectivity (PAMA) (to mothers), the Dyadic Adjustment Scale short version, the Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale, and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. The texts obtained through the in-depth interviews underwent thematic analysis. Fifty per cent of participants suffered from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders (PTSD) symptoms and 20% suffered from relational dyadic stress. Four areas of thematic prevalence emerged: psychological complexity of bereavement, the impact of the COVID-19, disenfranchisement vs. support, and spirituality and contact with the lost child. Participants interpreted their distress as related to inadequate access to healthcare services, and perceiving the pandemic restrictions to be responsible for less support and lower quality of care. Furthermore, they needed psychological help, and most of them were unable to access this service. Spirituality/religiosity did not help, while contact with the fetus and burial did. It is important to implement psychological services in obstetrics departments to offer adequate support, even in pandemic situations.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Perinatal bereavement is an event that greatly impacts the emotional, psychological, and psychosocial aspects of those who want to have a child.
Objectives
UNASSIGNED
Since there are few studies on the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on couples grieving for perinatal loss, this research aimed to survey this experience.
Participants
UNASSIGNED
Between 2020 and 2021, in Italian provinces highly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, 21 parents participated: 16 mothers (76%; mean age 36.2; SD: 3.1) and 5 fathers (24%; mean age 40.2; SD: 3.4), among which there were 4 couples.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
A mixed-method design was used through self-report questionnaires and in-depth interviews. Accompanied by a sociodemographic form, the following questionnaires were administered: Prolonged Grief-13, the Parental Assessment of Paternal Affectivity (PAPA) (to fathers), the Parental Assessment of Maternal Affectivity (PAMA) (to mothers), the Dyadic Adjustment Scale short version, the Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale, and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. The texts obtained through the in-depth interviews underwent thematic analysis.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Fifty per cent of participants suffered from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders (PTSD) symptoms and 20% suffered from relational dyadic stress. Four areas of thematic prevalence emerged: psychological complexity of bereavement, the impact of the COVID-19, disenfranchisement vs. support, and spirituality and contact with the lost child. Participants interpreted their distress as related to inadequate access to healthcare services, and perceiving the pandemic restrictions to be responsible for less support and lower quality of care. Furthermore, they needed psychological help, and most of them were unable to access this service. Spirituality/religiosity did not help, while contact with the fetus and burial did.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
It is important to implement psychological services in obstetrics departments to offer adequate support, even in pandemic situations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36172232
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.929350
pmc: PMC9510916
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
929350Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Testoni, Ronconi, Iacona, Trainini, Tralli, Nodari, Limongelli and Cena.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Nov 06;69(44):1641-1647
pubmed: 33151921
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 25;11:617001
pubmed: 33324308
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993 Dec 30;52(3):163-8
pubmed: 8163030
BMJ. 2020 Jun 8;369:m2107
pubmed: 32513659
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 19;11:1216
pubmed: 32625140
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jan 10;20(1):11
pubmed: 31918681
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2006 Jul-Sep;20(3):227-34; quiz 235-6
pubmed: 16915054
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jan 19;16:9
pubmed: 26785915
BMJ. 2020 Sep 1;370:m3320
pubmed: 32873575
J Affect Disord. 2017 Sep;219:86-92
pubmed: 28531848
Psychol Assess. 2005 Mar;17(1):15-27
pubmed: 15769225
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 07;63(1):e84
pubmed: 32892763
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Oct;65(4):812-21
pubmed: 8229652
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 May;210(5):315-323
pubmed: 28302701
Health Promot J Austr. 2009 Aug;20(2):92-7
pubmed: 19642955
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;223(4):595-599.e5
pubmed: 32553910
Omega (Westport). 2011;63(2):183-96
pubmed: 21842665
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:1427-32
pubmed: 24092980
Qual Health Res. 2015 Sep;25(9):1212-22
pubmed: 26184336
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Sep 25;69(38):1347-1354
pubmed: 32970655
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 02;12:619684
pubmed: 34408671
Reprod Health. 2021 Jan 18;18(1):10
pubmed: 33461593
Death Stud. 2001 Apr-May;25(3):205-28
pubmed: 11785540
PLoS One. 2019 May 28;14(5):e0217395
pubmed: 31136597
JAMA. 2020 Jul 10;:
pubmed: 32648892
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Sep 12;11(9):e38866
pubmed: 36044641
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2010 Sep;47(3):288-95
pubmed: 22402086
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Nov 15;17(1):380
pubmed: 29141591
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2005 Nov-Dec;30(6):389-96
pubmed: 16260944
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 24;12:630594
pubmed: 33716895
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 2;6(11):e011864
pubmed: 27807081
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jul;8(7):e901-e908
pubmed: 32405459
Ann Behav Med. 2002 Winter;24(1):22-33
pubmed: 12008791
J Affect Disord. 2011 Jun;131(1-3):339-43
pubmed: 21216470
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104447
pubmed: 32425663
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 18;11:1892
pubmed: 32973604
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Aug;9(8):e1066
pubmed: 34297960
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017 Oct;20(5):655-662
pubmed: 28623418
Omega (Westport). 2021 May;83(1):33-63
pubmed: 30975028
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;136(2):252-258
pubmed: 32433453
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012 Jun;14(2):187-94
pubmed: 22754291
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May;224(5):510.e1-510.e12
pubmed: 33221292
Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2022 Mar-Apr;14:100981
pubmed: 35187292
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 16;9:701638
pubmed: 34336776
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;20(8):904-905
pubmed: 32738239
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;223(6):911.e1-911.e14
pubmed: 32439389