Differentiating a pachychoroid and healthy choroid using an unsupervised machine learning approach.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 09 2022
29 09 2022
Historique:
received:
05
11
2021
accepted:
19
09
2022
entrez:
29
9
2022
pubmed:
30
9
2022
medline:
4
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to introduce a new machine learning approach for differentiation of a pachychoroid from a healthy choroid based on enhanced depth-optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) imaging. This study included EDI-OCT images of 103 eyes from 82 patients with central serous chorioretinopathy or pachychoroid pigment epitheliopathy, and 103 eyes from 103 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects. Choroidal features including choroidal thickness (CT), choroidal area (CA), Haller layer thickness (HT), Sattler-choriocapillaris thickness (SCT), and the choroidal vascular index (CVI) were extracted. The Haller ratio (HR) was obtained by dividing HT by CT. Multivariate TwoStep cluster analysis was performed with a preset number of two clusters based on a combination of different choroidal features. Clinical criteria were developed based on the results of the cluster analysis, and two independent skilled retina specialists graded a separate testing dataset based on the new clinical criteria. TwoStep cluster analysis achieved a sensitivity of 1.000 (95-CI: 0.938-1.000) and a specificity of 0.986 (95-CI: 0.919-1.000) in the differentiation of pachy- and healthy choroid. The best result for identification of pachychoroid was obtained for a combination of CT, HR, and CVI, with a correct classification rate of 0.993 (95-CI: 0.980-1.000). Based on the relative variable importance (RVI), the cluster analysis prioritized the choroidal features as follows: HR (RVI: 1.0), CVI (RVI: 0.87), CT (RVI: 0.70), CA (RVI: 0.59), and SCT (RVI: 0.27). After performing a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis on the cluster membership variable, a cutoff point of 389 µm and 0.79 was determined for CT and HR, respectively. Based on these clinical criteria, a sensitivity of 0.793 (95-CI: 0.611-0.904) and a specificity of 0.786 (95-CI: 0.600-0.900) and 0.821 (95-CI: 0.638-0.924) were achieved for each grader. Cohen's kappa of inter-rater reliability was 0.895. Based on an unsupervised machine learning approach, a combination of the Haller ratio and choroidal thickness is the most valuable factor in the differentiation of pachy- and healthy choroids in a clinical setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36175534
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20749-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-20749-9
pmc: PMC9523041
doi:
Substances chimiques
Acrylic Resins
0
Hydrazines
0
polyacrylamide-hydrazide polymer
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
16323Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 18;16(6):e0244469
pubmed: 34143775
Respir Med. 2014 Feb;108(2):319-28
pubmed: 24238773
Retina. 2021 Feb 1;41(2):231-237
pubmed: 33315817
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):e0169152
pubmed: 28076442
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 May;213:244-251
pubmed: 32027868
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 23;32(1):58-68
pubmed: 32510015
Retina. 2015 Jan;35(1):10-6
pubmed: 25046398
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 2;11(1):4999
pubmed: 33654225
Eye (Lond). 2019 Jan;33(1):14-33
pubmed: 29995841
Eur Respir J. 2014 Dec;44(6):1600-7
pubmed: 25186268
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;256(12):2309-2317
pubmed: 30259090
Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 9;:
pubmed: 34108225
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun;259(6):1385-1400
pubmed: 33057904
J Diabetes Investig. 2016 Mar;7(2):219-25
pubmed: 27042274
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 2;10(1):18852
pubmed: 33139813
Retina. 2018 Jan;38(1):102-107
pubmed: 28106708
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Dec;4(12):1125-1128
pubmed: 33279007
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 12;6:21090
pubmed: 26868048
Retina. 2022 Jan 1;42(1):88-94
pubmed: 34267118
Immunol Med. 2018 Mar;41(1):30-33
pubmed: 30938256
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(1):204-212
pubmed: 34716214
Retina. 2016 Sep;36(9):1652-7
pubmed: 26934451