A Randomized Clinical Study of the Plaque Removal Efficacy of a Novel Manual Toothbrush With Micro-Pulse Bristles on Fixed Orthodontic Patients.
oral health
oral health education
plaque control
prevention
toothbrush
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Aug 2022
Historique:
accepted:
04
08
2022
entrez:
30
9
2022
pubmed:
1
10
2022
medline:
1
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background Fixed orthodontic appliances on tooth surfaces, such as brackets and bands, complicate oral hygiene and increase plaque accumulation, contributing to gingivitis, periodontitis, and tooth decay. While manual toothbrushes are an essential part of oral hygiene, there is little clinical evidence to demonstrate how effective manual toothbrushes with novel designs are at removing plaque from orthodontic patients. This study aims to evaluate three types of manual toothbrushes (Pulsar, conventional flat trim (C-TB), and orthodontic type (O-TB)) for their efficacy in plaque removal among patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. Methodology The study followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. It was a three-treatment, three-period, examiner-blinded crossover clinical trial conducted with a single brushing exercise. Twenty-four subjects were randomized to one of three different bristle designs (Pulsar, C-TB, and O-TB). The primary outcome measure was the difference (baseline minus post-brushing) in plaque scores assessed using the Turesky-Modified Quigley-Hein Plaque Index during each study period. Results Of the 27 subjects enrolled in the study, 24 met the inclusion criteria and completed all three periods of the study. The mean age was 19.58 ± 1.55 years, with a range of 18-23 years. The differences between treatments in plaque score reduction after brushing were statistically significant (p-value <0.001). The treatment differences were statistically significant (p-value <0.001), favoring the C-TB toothbrush and the O-TB over the Pulsar design. On the contrary, the difference between the O-TB and C-TB types was not statistically significant. Conclusions C-TB and O-TB remove significantly more plaque than Pulsar toothbrushes after a single brushing exercise. Nevertheless, the C-TB tested in this study was more effective in removing dental plaque than the O-TB in patients wearing fixed orthodontic appliances. Considering the limitations of this study, additional research is required before evidence-based advice concerning the relative performance of the Pulsar toothbrushes in fixed orthodontic patients can be proven.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36176832
doi: 10.7759/cureus.28453
pmc: PMC9510717
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e28453Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022, Al Shammari et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Int J Dent Hyg. 2022 Feb;20(1):87-99
pubmed: 33971076
Am J Dent. 2005 Feb;18(1):3-7
pubmed: 15810473
Dent J (Basel). 2020 Jan 02;8(1):
pubmed: 31906577
Braz Oral Res. 2012 Jul-Aug;26(4):360-5
pubmed: 22790501
Int J Dent Hyg. 2006 Nov;4(4):189-97
pubmed: 17038057
Eur J Orthod. 1987 Nov;9(4):295-304
pubmed: 3319654
J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Mar;44 Suppl 18:S116-S134
pubmed: 28266113
Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Jan-Feb;18(1):76-80
pubmed: 23876953
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jul;130(1):92-5
pubmed: 16849078
J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Apr;42 Suppl 16:S71-6
pubmed: 25639826
BMJ. 2019 Jul 31;366:l4378
pubmed: 31366597
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2014 Apr 01;5(1):e4
pubmed: 24800054
J Dent Hyg. 2008 Oct;82 Suppl 3:4-9
pubmed: 19275822
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Feb 1;19(2):150-155
pubmed: 29422463
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Nov;158(5):639-649
pubmed: 32951930
J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32 Suppl 6:214-28
pubmed: 16128840
Am J Dent. 2000 Mar;13(Spec No):5A-14A
pubmed: 11763943
J Clin Dent. 2007;18(2):49-54
pubmed: 17508624
Angle Orthod. 2017 Sep;87(5):651-657
pubmed: 28686092
J Dent Educ. 2008 Aug;72(8):912-8
pubmed: 18676800
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Oct;29(5):488-92
pubmed: 17974538
Eur J Orthod. 1986 Nov;8(4):229-34
pubmed: 3466795
J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Apr;42 Suppl 16:S77-91
pubmed: 25597787
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Jun;111(6):591-4
pubmed: 9199588
Int J Dent Hyg. 2012 Aug;10(3):187-97
pubmed: 22672101
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 17;(6):CD002281
pubmed: 24934383
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jul;46(7):723-739
pubmed: 31058336
J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Sep;31(9):749-57
pubmed: 15312097
Open Dent J. 2017 Feb 28;11:126-132
pubmed: 28357006
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Aug;138(2):188-94
pubmed: 20691360