Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent.
floral fragrance
floral scent
natural selection
plant-pollinator interactions
reduced-rank regression
selection gradient
Journal
Journal of evolutionary biology
ISSN: 1420-9101
Titre abrégé: J Evol Biol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 8809954
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
revised:
04
09
2022
received:
21
04
2022
accepted:
07
09
2022
pubmed:
1
10
2022
medline:
4
11
2022
entrez:
30
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Natural selection on floral scent composition is a key element of the hypothesis that pollinators and other floral visitors drive scent evolution. The measure of such selection is complicated by the high-dimensional nature of floral scent data and uncertainty about the cognitive processes involved in scent-mediated communication. We use dimension reduction through reduced-rank regression to jointly estimate a scent composite trait under selection and the strength of selection acting on this trait. To assess and compare variation in selection on scent across species, time and space, we reanalyse 22 datasets on six species from four previous studies. The results agreed qualitatively with previous analyses in terms of identifying populations and scent compounds subject to stronger selection but also allowed us to evaluate and compare the strength of selection on scent across studies. Doing so revealed that selection on floral scent was highly variable, and overall about as common and as strong as selection on other phenotypic traits involved in pollinator attraction or pollen transfer. These results are consistent with an important role of floral scent in pollinator attraction. Our approach should be useful for further studies of plant-animal communication and for studies of selection on other high-dimensional phenotypes. In particular, our approach will be useful for studies of pollinator-mediated selection on complex scent blends comprising many volatiles, and when no prior information on the physiological responses of pollinators to scent compounds is available.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36177776
doi: 10.1111/jeb.14103
pmc: PMC9828191
doi:
Substances chimiques
Volatile Organic Compounds
0
Pheromones
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1432-1441Subventions
Organisme : Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning
ID : 20:323
Organisme : Academy of Finland
ID : 284601
Organisme : Academy of Finland
ID : 309581
Organisme : Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation and the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence Funding Scheme
ID : 223257
Organisme : Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics and MF from the Swedish Research Council and the Crafoord Foundation
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology.
Références
New Phytol. 2020 Jan;225(2):985-998
pubmed: 31514238
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 May;28(5):307-15
pubmed: 23480953
New Phytol. 2012 Aug;195(3):667-675
pubmed: 22646058
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jun 13;285(1880):
pubmed: 29899070
Science. 2011 Sep 23;333(6050):1742-6
pubmed: 21940893
Evolution. 1983 Nov;37(6):1210-1226
pubmed: 28556011
Evolution. 2021 Feb;75(2):294-309
pubmed: 33230820
Science. 1969 Jun 13;164(3885):1243-9
pubmed: 17772561
Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Apr;15(4):140-143
pubmed: 10717682
Ann Bot. 2016 Jul;118(1):135-48
pubmed: 27240855
Heredity (Edinb). 2015 Oct;115(4):357-65
pubmed: 25204302
New Phytol. 2016 Sep;211(4):1402-11
pubmed: 27112321
New Phytol. 2009 Aug;183(3):530-545
pubmed: 19552694
Science. 2013 Mar 8;339(6124):1202-4
pubmed: 23471406
Evolution. 2019 Jan;73(1):4-14
pubmed: 30411337
J Exp Biol. 2014 Feb 15;217(Pt 4):614-23
pubmed: 24198269
New Phytol. 2016 Feb;209(3):1208-19
pubmed: 26391626
Curr Biol. 2009 Aug 25;19(16):1368-72
pubmed: 19664924
New Phytol. 2019 Jun;222(4):2009-2022
pubmed: 30767233
Science. 2003 Oct 17;302(5644):437-8
pubmed: 14564006
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 4;105(9):3404-9
pubmed: 18305169
New Phytol. 2010 Jun;186(4):995-1004
pubmed: 20345644
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 5;116(10):4406-4415
pubmed: 30765532
Am Nat. 2006 Oct;168(4):531-45
pubmed: 17004224
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 17;11(2):e0147975
pubmed: 26886766
New Phytol. 2015 Dec;208(4):1264-75
pubmed: 26183369
Ann Bot. 2021 May 7;127(6):737-747
pubmed: 33555338
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 06;5:12779
pubmed: 26245141
Evolution. 2018 Apr;72(4):798-807
pubmed: 29464694
Evol Lett. 2018 Jun 21;2(4):272-280
pubmed: 30283681
J Chem Ecol. 2015 Jul;41(7):641-50
pubmed: 26133675
J Chem Ecol. 2014 Sep;40(9):955-65
pubmed: 25236381
Ann Bot. 2017 Sep 1;120(3):471-478
pubmed: 28655187
Ann Bot. 2018 Mar 14;121(4):711-721
pubmed: 29360931
Methods Ecol Evol. 2020 Mar;11(3):442-447
pubmed: 32194928
Br Foreign Med Chir Rev. 1862 Oct;30(60):312-318
pubmed: 30163543
J Evol Biol. 2020 Jun 5;:
pubmed: 32500947
Am Nat. 2014 Jul;184(1):91-109
pubmed: 24921603
Evolution. 2004 Oct;58(10):2133-43
pubmed: 15562680
Nat Commun. 2017 Mar 14;8:14691
pubmed: 28291771
Syst Biol. 2000 Dec;49(4):740-53
pubmed: 12116437
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Oct 7;282(1816):20152053
pubmed: 26446814
New Phytol. 2015 Apr;206(2):571-7
pubmed: 25605223
J Evol Biol. 2022 Nov;35(11):1432-1441
pubmed: 36177776
Ecology. 2008 Jul;89(7):1802-10
pubmed: 18705368
New Phytol. 2006;169(4):707-18
pubmed: 16441752
Q Rev Biol. 2011 Mar;86(1):3-34
pubmed: 21495498
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Sep 24;12:719092
pubmed: 34630465
New Phytol. 2018 Nov;220(3):739-749
pubmed: 28256726
Evolution. 2013 Jul;67(7):2094-100
pubmed: 23815662