Advancing Healthy Food Service in the United States: State Food Service Guidelines Policy Adoption and Implementation Supports, 2015-2019.

food service food systems health disparities health policy nutrition sustainability

Journal

American journal of health promotion : AJHP
ISSN: 2168-6602
Titre abrégé: Am J Health Promot
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8701680

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 1 10 2022
medline: 18 2 2023
entrez: 30 9 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Food service guidelines (FSG) policies can impact the nutritional quality of millions of meals sold or served to government employees, citizens in public places, or institutionalized persons. This study examines state FSG policies adopted January 1, 2015 to April 1, 2019, and uses a FSG Classification Tool (FSG Tool) to quantify alignment with nutrition recommendations for public health impact. Quantitative Content Analysis. State Government Worksites and Facilities. 50 states and District of Columbia (D.C.) in the United States. Frequency of policies and percent alignment to FSG tool. FSG policies were identified using legal databases to assess state statutes, regulations, and executive orders. Content analysis and coding determined attributes of policies across 4 FSG Tool domains, (1) nutrition standards referenced; (2) behavioral design strategies encouraging selection of healthier offerings; (3) facility efficiency and environmental sustainability; and (4) FSG implementation supports. From 2015-2019, 5 FSG policies met study inclusion criteria. Four out of 5 policies earned a perfect nutrition score (100%) by referencing nutrition standards that align with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) and are operationalized for use in food service venues. Four out of 5 policies included at least 1 implementation supports provision, such as naming an implementing agency, and 2 included provisions that encourage local food sourcing. From 2015-2019, overall FSG policy comprehensiveness scores ranged from 24% to 73%, with most policies referencing food and nutrition standards that align to national nutrition recommendations. Public health practitioners can educate decision makers on the potential impact of FSG policies on diet-related health outcomes and associated cost savings, as well as other important co-benefits that support locally grown products and environmental sustainability practices.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36178159
doi: 10.1177/08901171221123311
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

300-312

Auteurs

Amy Lowry-Warnock (A)

Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, 314505Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Nicole Strombom (N)

Public Health Law Program Host-Site Intern, Applied Research and Translation, Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, 314505Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Kristy Mugavero (K)

Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, 314505Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Diane Harris (D)

Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, 314505Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Heidi M Blanck (HM)

Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, 314505Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
United States Public Health Service, Rockville, MD, USA.

Stephen Onufrak (S)

Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, 314505Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH