Analysis of the Human Pineal Proteome by Mass Spectrometry.
Autism
Human
Mass spectrometry
Pineal gland
Protein
Journal
Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)
ISSN: 1940-6029
Titre abrégé: Methods Mol Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9214969
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
entrez:
30
9
2022
pubmed:
1
10
2022
medline:
5
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The human pineal gland regulates the day-night dynamics of multiple physiological processes, especially through the secretion of melatonin. Recently, using mass spectrometry-based proteomics and dedicated analysis tools, we have identified regulated proteins and signaling pathways that differ between day and night and/or between control and autistic pineal glands. This large-scale proteomic approach is the method of choice to study proteins in a biological system globally. This chapter proposes a protocol for large-scale analysis of the pineal gland proteome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36180685
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2593-4_16
doi:
Substances chimiques
Proteome
0
Melatonin
JL5DK93RCL
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
123-132Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Aebersold R, Mann M (2016) Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function. Nature 537:347–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19949
doi: 10.1038/nature19949
pubmed: 27629641
Dumas G, Goubran-Botros H, Matondo M et al (2020) Mass-spectrometry analysis of the human pineal proteome during night and day and in autism. J Pineal Res 70:e12713. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpi.12713
doi: 10.1111/jpi.12713
Ackermann K, Bux R, Rüb U et al (2006) Characterization of human melatonin synthesis using autoptic pineal tissue. Endocrinology 147:3235–3242. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2006-0043
doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0043
pubmed: 16556767
Müller T, Kalxdorf M, Longuespée R et al (2020) Automated sample preparation with SP3 for low-input clinical proteomics. Mol Syst Biol 16:e9111. https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20199111
doi: 10.15252/msb.20199111
pubmed: 32129943
pmcid: 6966100
Wiśniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N et al (2009) Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat Methods 6:359–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1322
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1322
pubmed: 19377485
Zougman A, Selby PJ, Banks RE (2014) Suspension trapping (STrap) sample preparation method for bottom-up proteomics analysis. Proteomics 14:1006-0. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201300553
doi: 10.1002/pmic.201300553
pubmed: 24678027
Hughes CS, Moggridge S, Müller T et al (2019) Single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation for proteomics experiments. Nat Protoc 14:68–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0082-x
doi: 10.1038/s41596-018-0082-x
pubmed: 30464214
Gillet LC, Navarro P, Tate S et al (2012) Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics 11(O111):016717. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.O111.016717
doi: 10.1074/mcp.O111.016717
pubmed: 22261725
Cox J, Mann M (2008) MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol 26:1367–1372. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1511
doi: 10.1038/nbt.1511
pubmed: 19029910
Bubis JA, Levitsky LI, Ivanov MV et al (2017) Comparative evaluation of label-free quantification methods for shotgun proteomics. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 31:606–612. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7829
doi: 10.1002/rcm.7829
pubmed: 28097710
Kuharev J, Navarro P, Distler U et al (2015) In-depth evaluation of software tools for data-independent acquisition based label-free quantification. Proteomics 15:3140–3151. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201400396
doi: 10.1002/pmic.201400396
pubmed: 25545627
Dellière S, Duchateau M, Wong SSW et al (2021) Proteomic analysis of humoral immune components in bronchoalveolar lavage of patients infected or colonized by aspergillus fumigatus. Front Immunol 12:677798. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.677798
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.677798
pubmed: 34122441
pmcid: 8187748
Meignié A, Combredet C, Santolini M et al (2021) Proteomic analysis uncovers measles virus protein C interaction with p65-iASPP protein complex. Mol Cell Proteomics 20:100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100049
doi: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100049
pubmed: 33515806
pmcid: 7950213
Addi C, Presle A, Frémont S et al (2020) The Flemmingsome reveals an ESCRT-to-membrane coupling via ALIX/syntenin/syndecan-4 required for completion of cytokinesis. Nat Commun 11:1941. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15205-z
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15205-z
pubmed: 32321914
pmcid: 7176721
Hughes ME, Hogenesch JB, Kornacker K (2010) JTK_CYCLE: an efficient nonparametric algorithm for detecting rhythmic components in genome-scale data sets. J Biol Rhythm 25:372–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730410379711
doi: 10.1177/0748730410379711
Zechmeister M, Kürster M (2009) The generalised Lomb-Scargle periodogram. Astron Astrophys 496:577–584. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200811296
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200811296
Mortier A, Faria JP, Correia CM et al (2015) BGLS: a Bayesian formalism for the generalised Lomb-Scargle periodogram. Astron Astrophys 573:A101. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424908
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424908
Maere S, Heymans K, Kuiper M (2005) BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics 21:3448–3449. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti551
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti551
pubmed: 15972284
Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O et al (2003) Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13:2498–2504. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1239303
doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303
pubmed: 14597658
pmcid: 403769
Rual J-F, Venkatesan K, Hao T et al (2005) Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature 437:1173–1178. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04209
doi: 10.1038/nature04209
pubmed: 16189514
Venkatesan K, Rual J-F, Vazquez A et al (2009) An empirical framework for binary interactome mapping. Nat Methods 6:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1280
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1280
pubmed: 19060904
Yu H, Tardivo L, Tam S et al (2011) Next-generation sequencing to generate interactome datasets. Nat Methods 8:478–480. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1597
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1597
pubmed: 21516116
pmcid: 3188388
Rolland T, Taşan M, Charloteaux B et al (2014) A proteome-scale map of the human interactome network. Cell 159:1212–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.050
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.050
pubmed: 25416956
pmcid: 4266588
Yelamanchi SD, Kumar M, Madugundu AK et al (2016) Characterization of human pineal gland proteome. Mol BioSyst 12:3622–3632. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6mb00507a
doi: 10.1039/c6mb00507a
pubmed: 27714013
Stehle JH, Saade A, Rawashdeh O et al (2011) A survey of molecular details in the human pineal gland in the light of phylogeny, structure, function and chronobiological diseases. J Pineal Res 51:17–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-079X.2011.00856.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-079X.2011.00856.x
pubmed: 21517957
Mays JC, Kelly MC, Coon SL et al (2018) Single-cell RNA sequencing of the mammalian pineal gland identifies two pinealocyte subtypes and cell type-specific daily patterns of gene expression. PLoS One 13:e0205883. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205883
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205883
pubmed: 30347410
pmcid: 6197868