Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy retroillumination: applications and illusions.
Confocal
Light scattering
Optical coherence tomography
Pseudocolor
Retinal imaging
Retroillumination
Scanning laser ophthalmoscope
Shape-from-shading
Transillumination
Visual illusion
pseudo3D
Journal
International journal of retina and vitreous
ISSN: 2056-9920
Titre abrégé: Int J Retina Vitreous
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101677897
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Sep 2022
30 Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
15
06
2022
accepted:
10
09
2022
entrez:
30
9
2022
pubmed:
1
10
2022
medline:
1
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Scanning laser ophthalmoscopes (SLOs) are used widely for reflectance, fluorescence or autofluorescence photography and less commonly for retroillumination imaging. SLOs scan a visible light or near-infrared radiation laser beam across the retina, collecting light from each retinal spot as it's illuminated. An SLO's clinical applications, image contrast and axial resolution are largely determined by an aperture overlying its photodetector. High contrast, reflectance images are produced using small diameter, centered apertures (confocal apertures) that collect retroreflections and reject side-scattered veiling light returned from the fundus. Retroillumination images are acquired with annular on-axis or laterally-displaced off-axis apertures that capture scattered light and reject the retroreflected light used for reflectance imaging. SLO axial resolution is roughly 300 μm, comparable to macular thickness, so SLOs cannot provide the depth-resolved chorioretinal information obtainable with optical coherence tomography's (OCT's) 3 μm axial resolution. Retroillumination highlights and shades the boundaries of chorioretinal tissues and abnormalities, facilitating detection of small drusen, subretinal drusenoid deposits and subthreshold laser lesions. It also facilitates screening for large-area chorioretinal irregularities not readily identified with other en face retinal imaging modalities. Shaded boundaries create the perception of lesion elevation or depression, a characteristic of retroillumination but not reflectance SLO images. These illusions are not reliable representations of three-dimensional chorioretinal anatomy and they differ from objective OCT en face topography. SLO retroillumination has been a useful but not indispensable retinal imaging modality for over 30 years. Continuing investigation is needed to determine its most appropriate clinical roles in multimodal retinal imaging.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36180893
doi: 10.1186/s40942-022-00421-0
pii: 10.1186/s40942-022-00421-0
pmc: PMC9524008
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
71Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Arch Ophthalmol. 1960 Oct;64:606-15
pubmed: 13704161
J Vis. 2013 Nov 01;13(13):2
pubmed: 24187057
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec;150(6):856-62
pubmed: 20875634
Exp Eye Res. 1994 Feb;58(2):161-73
pubmed: 8157109
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999 Nov;237(11):897-901
pubmed: 10541899
Appl Opt. 1980 Sep 1;19(17):2991-7
pubmed: 20234539
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1981 Jul;28(7):488-92
pubmed: 7275128
Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;89(5):e404-11
pubmed: 21332676
Appl Opt. 1989 Mar 15;28(6):1061-77
pubmed: 20548621
Br J Ophthalmol. 1994 Feb;78(2):84-90
pubmed: 8123631
Phys Med Biol. 1997 May;42(5):951-66
pubmed: 9172269
Micron. 2003;34(1):57-62
pubmed: 12694858
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2008 Jul;27(4):464-99
pubmed: 18495519
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Oct;7(10):1057-8
pubmed: 15361877
Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Jun;119(6):819-24
pubmed: 11405832
Retina. 2019 Jul;39(7):1333-1342
pubmed: 29554078
Appl Opt. 1987 Apr 15;26(8):1492-9
pubmed: 20454349
Am J Ophthalmol. 1993 Oct 15;116(4):484-8
pubmed: 8213980
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul;154(1):155-163.e4
pubmed: 22503695
Nature. 1988 Jan 14;331(6152):163-6
pubmed: 3340162
Retina. 2018 Mar;38(3):445-461
pubmed: 29210936
Handb Clin Neurol. 2021;178:311-335
pubmed: 33832684
Ophthalmology. 1982 Jul;89(7):852-7
pubmed: 7122056
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Jan;251(1):27-34
pubmed: 22580948
Ophthalmology. 1986 Jul;93(7):952-8
pubmed: 3763141
Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Apr;82(4):342-5
pubmed: 9640178
Vision Res. 2020 Dec;177:88-96
pubmed: 33002649
Retina. 2020 Jul;40(7):1374-1378
pubmed: 31181039
Br J Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;97(3):285-90
pubmed: 23264545
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;153(4):587-93
pubmed: 22445628
Ophthalmology. 2002 Nov;109(11):2165-9
pubmed: 12414434
Eye (Lond). 2022 Oct;36(10):1940-1944
pubmed: 34584231
Vision Res. 1996 Jan;36(1):191-205
pubmed: 8746253
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Jan 3;11(1):28
pubmed: 35044444
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 May;120(5):675-6; author reply 676
pubmed: 12003634
Vis Neurosci. 2002 Jul-Aug;19(4):395-407
pubmed: 12511073
Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Nov;83(11):1241-5
pubmed: 10535848
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55865
pubmed: 23457484
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;38(1):27-36
pubmed: 20447098
Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104664
pubmed: 33743516
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Apr;149(4):635-640.e1
pubmed: 20346779
J Opt Soc Am. 1970 Jun;60(6):848-55
pubmed: 5469780
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;28(2):88-94
pubmed: 24843300
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Mar 1;10(3):8
pubmed: 34003942
Can J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;56(4):279
pubmed: 33249113
Br J Ophthalmol. 1992 Aug;76(8):470-4
pubmed: 1390528
Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 Sep;121(9):1246-51
pubmed: 12963607
Am J Ophthalmol. 1998 May;125(5):710-2
pubmed: 9625561
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998 Jun;236(6):445-50
pubmed: 9646090
Physiol Meas. 2002 Feb;23(1):1-10
pubmed: 11876222
Retina. 2020 Dec;40(12):2277-2284
pubmed: 32039941
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Oct;4(10):987-995
pubmed: 32771389
Physiol Meas. 1994 Aug;15(3):317-24
pubmed: 7994210
Retina. 2009 Oct;29(9):1328-34
pubmed: 19934823
Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 May;95(3):e246-e248
pubmed: 26815408
Eye (Lond). 2022 Aug;36(8):1560-1566
pubmed: 34262164
Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2016 Fall;10(4):373-6
pubmed: 26674276
Curr Eye Res. 1993 Nov;12(11):1015-8
pubmed: 8306711