d-mannosuria levels measured 1 h after d-mannose intake can select out favorable responders: A pilot study.


Journal

Neurourology and urodynamics
ISSN: 1520-6777
Titre abrégé: Neurourol Urodyn
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8303326

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2023
Historique:
revised: 19 09 2022
received: 14 06 2022
accepted: 22 09 2022
pubmed: 3 10 2022
medline: 3 1 2023
entrez: 2 10 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

d-mannose is used as preventive measure against recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTIs). We studied d-mannosuria after a challenge test to identify favorable responders that could be targeted for long-term preventive therapy. Following institutional review board approval, women attending a specialized tertiary care center urology clinic with a history of RUTIs were invited to participate by providing a urine sample (baseline), followed by the intake of home-dose d-mannose, and a second urine sample 1 h later (post). Urine samples were processed according to a d-mannosuria assay technique reported previously by our group. d-mannose concentrations were normalized to urinary creatinine. From July 2020 to March 2021, 26 patients met study criteria. Thirteen had a lower or unchanged ratio of baseline to post d-mannose, whereas 13 were responders. Among 19 taking 2 g, 12 had a lower or unchanged trend and 7 were responders with >20% increase in the d-mannose/creatinine ratio. Comparison of urinary baseline d-mannose/creatinine ratios was significantly different between the responder (mean = 0.337 ± 0.158) and nonresponder (mean = 0.692 ± 0.444; p = 0.016) groups. Urinary post d-mannose/creatinine ratios did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.46). d-mannose-naïve patients had few responders, and age and urinary creatinine did not affect the findings. This preliminary study on d-mannose challenge tests indicates a urine response if urinary d-mannose/creatinine ratio is low, which it was in some women with a history of RUTIs.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
d-mannose is used as preventive measure against recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTIs). We studied d-mannosuria after a challenge test to identify favorable responders that could be targeted for long-term preventive therapy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Following institutional review board approval, women attending a specialized tertiary care center urology clinic with a history of RUTIs were invited to participate by providing a urine sample (baseline), followed by the intake of home-dose d-mannose, and a second urine sample 1 h later (post). Urine samples were processed according to a d-mannosuria assay technique reported previously by our group. d-mannose concentrations were normalized to urinary creatinine.
RESULTS
From July 2020 to March 2021, 26 patients met study criteria. Thirteen had a lower or unchanged ratio of baseline to post d-mannose, whereas 13 were responders. Among 19 taking 2 g, 12 had a lower or unchanged trend and 7 were responders with >20% increase in the d-mannose/creatinine ratio. Comparison of urinary baseline d-mannose/creatinine ratios was significantly different between the responder (mean = 0.337 ± 0.158) and nonresponder (mean = 0.692 ± 0.444; p = 0.016) groups. Urinary post d-mannose/creatinine ratios did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.46). d-mannose-naïve patients had few responders, and age and urinary creatinine did not affect the findings.
CONCLUSION
This preliminary study on d-mannose challenge tests indicates a urine response if urinary d-mannose/creatinine ratio is low, which it was in some women with a history of RUTIs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36183388
doi: 10.1002/nau.25059
doi:

Substances chimiques

Mannose PHA4727WTP
Creatinine AYI8EX34EU

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

49-55

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

Al-Badr A, Al-Shaikh G. Recurrent urinary tract infections management in women: a review. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2013;13(3):359-367.
Foxman B, Gillespie B, Koopman J, et al. Risk factors for second urinary tract infection among college women. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151(12):1194-1205.
Anger J, Lee U, Ackerman AL, et al. Recurrent uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women: AUA/CUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2019;202(2):282-289.
Kyriakides R, Jones P, Somani BK. Role of D-mannose in the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections: evidence from a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;7:1166-1169.
Domenici L, Monti M, Bracchi C, et al. D-mannose: a promising support for acute urinarytract infections in women. A pilot study. EurRev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016;20(13):2920-2925.
Kuzmenko AV, Kuzmenko VV, Gyaurgiev TA. Efficacy of combined antibacterial-prebiotic therapy in combination with D-mannose in women with uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection. Urologiia. 2019;(6):38-43.
Phé V, Pakzad M, Haslam C, et al. Open label feasibility study evaluating D-mannose combined with home-based monitoring of suspected urinary tract infections in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(7):1770-1775.
Porru D, Parmigiani A, Tinelli C, et al. Oral D-mannose in recurrent urinary tract infections in women: a pilot study. J Clin Urol. 2014;7(3):208-213.
Kranjcec B, Papes D, Altarac S. D-mannose powder for prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infections in women: a randomized clinical trial. World J Urol. 2014;32(1):79-84.
Altarac S, Papes D. Use of D-mannose in prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) in women. BJU Int. 2014;113(1):9-10.
Alton G, Hasilik M, Niehues R, et al. Direct utilization of mannose for mammalian glycoprotein biosynthesis. Glycobiology. 1998;8(3):285-295.
Mehta I, Zimmern P, Reitzer L. Enzymatic assay of D-mannose from urine. Bioanalysis. 2018;10(23):1947-1954.
Malik RD, Wu YR, Zimmern PE. Definition of recurrent urinary tract infections in women: which one to adopt? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018;24(6):424-429.
Toora BD, Rajagopal G. Measurement of creatinine by jaffe's reaction-determination of concentration of sodium hydroxide required for maximum color development in standard, urine and protein free filtrate of serum. Indian J Exp Biol. 2002;40(3):352-354.
Sharma V, Ichikawa M, Freeze HH. Mannose metabolism: more than meets the eye. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;453(2):220-228.
Hu X, Shi Y, Zhang P, Miao M, Zhang T, Jiang B. D-mannose: properties, production, and applications: an overview. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2016;15(4):773-785.
Michaels EK, Chmiel JS, Plotkin BJ, Schaeffer AJ. Effect of D-mannose and d-glucose on Escherichia coli bacteriuria in rats. Urol Res. 1983;11(2):97-102.
Liu H, Gu R, Zhu Y, et al. D-mannose attenuates bone loss in mice via treg cell proliferation and gut microbiota-dependent anti-inflammatory effects. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2020;11:2040622320912661.
Torretta S, Scagliola A, Ricci L, et al. D-mannose suppresses macrophage IL-1beta production. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):6343.
Lenger SM, Bradley MS, Thomas DA, Bertolet MH, Lowder JL, Sutcliffe S. D-mannose vs other agents for recurrent urinary tract infection prevention in adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(2):265 e1-265 e13.
Toyota S, Fukushi Y, Katoh S, Orikasa S, Suzuki Y. [Anti-bacterial defense mechanism of the urinary bladder. Role of mannose in urine]. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1989;80(12):1816-1823.
Shoemaker JD, Elliott WH. Automated screening of urine samples for carbohydrates, organic and amino acids after treatment with urease. J Chromatogr. 1991;562(1-2):125-138.

Auteurs

Ethan Fan (E)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centerm, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Marjan Dashti (M)

Department of Biology, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.

Jorge Fuentes (J)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centerm, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Larry Reitzer (L)

Department of Biology, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.

Alana L Christie (AL)

Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center Biostatistics Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Philippe E Zimmern (PE)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centerm, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH