Modified Atkins diet versus ketogenic diet in children with drug-resistant epilepsy: A meta-analysis of comparative studies.
Drug resistant epilepsy
Efficacy
Ketogenic diet
Modified atkins diet
Refractory epilepsy
Journal
Clinical nutrition ESPEN
ISSN: 2405-4577
Titre abrégé: Clin Nutr ESPEN
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101654592
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
22
05
2022
revised:
29
07
2022
accepted:
02
09
2022
entrez:
2
10
2022
pubmed:
3
10
2022
medline:
5
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The modified Atkins diet (MAD), a less restrictive form of the ketogenic diet (KD), has gained popularity and is proposed to be an alternative to the traditional KD in the management of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). However, the evidence to support this hypothesis remains limited. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of MAD compared to traditional KD in children with DRE. We systematically searched multiple databases through March 2022 for all the studies that evaluated the clinical utility of MAD versus KD for DRE in a pediatric population. The primary outcome was the proportion of children who had seizure frequency reduction (SFR) > 50%. The secondary outcomes were SFR >90%, seizure freedom, and diet-related side effects. All measurements were taken 6 months after starting the regimens. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and combined using random-effects model meta-analysis. Six studies, with 397 patients with DRE (201 followed MAD vs. 196 with KD), were included. There was a significant difference in the proportion of patients who attained SFR >50% favoring the traditional KD (RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.47-0.83; P = 0.001). However, there was no significant differences in SFR >90% (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.49-1.10; P = 0.13) or the proportion of patients who had seizure freedom (RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.49-1.41; P = 0.49). Furthermore, both regimens had comparable safety profiles (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.95-1.05; P = 0.96). Our meta-analysis demonstrated the superiority of traditional KD over MAD in achieving SFR > 50% at 6 months in pediatric patients with DRE. However, SFR > 90% and seizure freedom were comparable between KD and MAD at 6 months. The tolerability profile between the two regimens was similar as well. Large-scale RCTs are necessary to validate our findings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36184195
pii: S2405-4577(22)00467-3
doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.09.004
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
112-119Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.