Surveillance of the spread of avian influenza virus type A in live bird markets in Tripoli, Libya, and determination of the associated risk factors.
Tripoli
avian influenza
live birds market
risk factors
Journal
Veterinary world
ISSN: 0972-8988
Titre abrégé: Vet World
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101504872
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
16
02
2022
accepted:
18
05
2022
entrez:
3
10
2022
pubmed:
4
10
2022
medline:
4
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Studies on avian influenza virus (AIV) in Libya are few and limited. This study aimed to determine the presence of AIV in live bird markets (LBMs) in Tripoli and determine the risk factors associated with AIV spread . In total, 269 cloacal swabs were randomly collected from different bird species in 9 LBMs located in Tripoli and its surrounding regions. The target species were ducks, geese, local chickens, Australian chickens, Brahma chickens, turkeys, pigeons, quails, peacock broiler chicks, and pet birds. Total RNA was extracted from the swab samples and used for real-time polymerase chain reaction to detect AIV type A. Of the 269 samples, 28 (10.41% of total samples) were positive for AIV type A. The LBMs with positive samples were Souq Aljumaa, Souq Alkhamees, Souq Althulatha, and Souq Tajoura. The highest percentage (35.71%) of AIV was recorded in Souq Aljumaa. Positive results for AIV type A were obtained primarily in three species of birds: Ducks (14/65; highest percentage: 21.5%), local chickens (12/98; 12.24%), and geese (2/28; 7.14%). Furthermore, the following three risk factors associated with the spread of AIV type A were identified: Time spent by breeders/vendors at the market (odds ratio [OR] = 11.181; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.827-32.669), methods used for disposing dead birds (OR = 2.356; 95% CI = 1.005-5.521), and last visited LBM (OR = 0.740; 95% CI = 0.580-0.944). Restricting the movement of poultry vendors from one market to another may protect against AIV spread. The findings of this study indicate the high risk of AIV spread in LBMs and highlight the need for continuous surveillance of LBMs across the country.
Sections du résumé
Background and Aim
UNASSIGNED
Studies on avian influenza virus (AIV) in Libya are few and limited. This study aimed to determine the presence of AIV in live bird markets (LBMs) in Tripoli and determine the risk factors associated with AIV spread .
Materials and Methods
UNASSIGNED
In total, 269 cloacal swabs were randomly collected from different bird species in 9 LBMs located in Tripoli and its surrounding regions. The target species were ducks, geese, local chickens, Australian chickens, Brahma chickens, turkeys, pigeons, quails, peacock broiler chicks, and pet birds. Total RNA was extracted from the swab samples and used for real-time polymerase chain reaction to detect AIV type A.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Of the 269 samples, 28 (10.41% of total samples) were positive for AIV type A. The LBMs with positive samples were Souq Aljumaa, Souq Alkhamees, Souq Althulatha, and Souq Tajoura. The highest percentage (35.71%) of AIV was recorded in Souq Aljumaa. Positive results for AIV type A were obtained primarily in three species of birds: Ducks (14/65; highest percentage: 21.5%), local chickens (12/98; 12.24%), and geese (2/28; 7.14%). Furthermore, the following three risk factors associated with the spread of AIV type A were identified: Time spent by breeders/vendors at the market (odds ratio [OR] = 11.181; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.827-32.669), methods used for disposing dead birds (OR = 2.356; 95% CI = 1.005-5.521), and last visited LBM (OR = 0.740; 95% CI = 0.580-0.944). Restricting the movement of poultry vendors from one market to another may protect against AIV spread.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
The findings of this study indicate the high risk of AIV spread in LBMs and highlight the need for continuous surveillance of LBMs across the country.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36185527
doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.1684-1690
pii: Vetworld-15-1684
pmc: PMC9394145
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1684-1690Informations de copyright
Copyright: © Kammon, et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017 Jun;64(3):805-814
pubmed: 26608470
J R Soc Interface. 2011 Aug 7;8(61):1079-89
pubmed: 21131332
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 26;102(30):10682-7
pubmed: 16030144
Virus Evol. 2022 Feb 09;8(1):veac009
pubmed: 35494174
Avian Dis. 2010 Jun;54(2):911-4
pubmed: 20608538
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jun 4;2020:1487651
pubmed: 32566655
Emerg Infect Dis. 2018 Dec;24(12):2309-2316
pubmed: 30457545
One Health. 2016 Dec;2:55-64
pubmed: 27213177
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Jul;32(4):301-10
pubmed: 18457876
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019;8(1):637-639
pubmed: 30999819
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 25;105(12):4769-74
pubmed: 18362346
J Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 5;218(12):1861-1875
pubmed: 29986030
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2013 Jan;7(1):97-107
pubmed: 22458429
Viruses. 2013 Apr 23;5(4):1153-74
pubmed: 23611846
EFSA J. 2022 Apr 04;20(4):e07289
pubmed: 35386927
Virol J. 2009 Mar 28;6:38
pubmed: 19327163
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e43851
pubmed: 23028474
Emerg Infect Dis. 2018 Feb;24(2):352-355
pubmed: 29350140
J Gen Virol. 2012 Mar;93(Pt 3):541-550
pubmed: 22113008
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 03;7:42722
pubmed: 28256584
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Jun 1;43(11):4063-7
pubmed: 19569331
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Feb;12(2):227-34
pubmed: 16494747
Poult Sci. 2010 Aug;89(8):1647-50
pubmed: 20634520
Poult Sci. 2009 Apr;88(4):856-9
pubmed: 19276435
Pathogens. 2020 Nov 16;9(11):
pubmed: 33207803
Avian Dis. 2015 Sep;59(3):422-30
pubmed: 26478162
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Aug;76(16):5496-9
pubmed: 20581177
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2017 Jan;48(1):37-44
pubmed: 29644818
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Apr;76(7):2165-74
pubmed: 20118369
Lancet. 2004 Jan 17;363(9404):234-6
pubmed: 14738798