Long-day photoperiod and cool temperature induce flowering in cassava: Expression of signaling genes.
Manihot esculenta
RNA-seq
ambient temperature
flower induction
flower initiation
photoperiod
temperature
transcriptome expression
Journal
Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
19
06
2022
accepted:
23
08
2022
entrez:
3
10
2022
pubmed:
4
10
2022
medline:
4
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cassava is a staple food crop in the tropics, and is of particular importance in Africa. Recent development of genomic selection technology have improved the speed of cassava breeding; however, cassava flower initiation and development remains a bottleneck. The objectives of the current studies were to elucidate the effect of photoperiod, temperature and their interactions on the time of flowering and flower development in controlled environments, and to use RNA-sequencing to identify transcriptome expression underlying these environmental responses. Compared to a normal tropical day-length of 12 h, increasing the photoperiod by 4 h or decreasing the air temperature from 34/31 to 22°/19°C (day/night) substantially hastened the time to flowering. For both photoperiod and temperature, the environment most favorable for flowering was opposite the one for storage root harvest index. There was a pronounced treatment interaction: at warm day-time temperatures, percent flowering was low, and photoperiod had little effect. In contrast, at cooler temperatures, percent flowering increased, and long-day (LD) photoperiod had a strong effect in hastening flowering. In response to temperature, many differentially expressed genes in the sugar, phase-change, and flowering-time-integrator pathways had expression/flowering patterns in the same direction as in Arabidopsis (positive or negative) even though the effect of temperature on flowering operates in the reverse direction in cassava compared to Arabidopsis. Three trehalose-6-phosphate-synthase-1 (TPS1) genes and four members of the SPL gene family had significantly increased expression at cool temperature, suggesting sugar signaling roles in flower induction. In response to LD photoperiod, regulatory genes were expressed as in Arabidopsis and other LD flowering plants. Several hormone-related genes were expressed in response to both photoperiod and temperature. In summary, these findings provide insight on photoperiod and temperature responses and underlying gene expression that may assist breeding programs to manipulate flowering for more rapid crop improvement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36186068
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.973206
pmc: PMC9523484
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
973206Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Hyde and Setter.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
AoB Plants. 2013;5:pls046
pubmed: 23346343
J Exp Bot. 2014 Sep;65(17):4723-30
pubmed: 24958896
Econ Bot. 2018;72(3):263-277
pubmed: 30573920
Environ Dev Sustain. 2018;20:2427-2445
pubmed: 33312055
J Exp Bot. 2015 Jan;66(1):59-69
pubmed: 25326628
J Biol Chem. 2012 May 4;287(19):16007-16
pubmed: 22431732
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003 Feb;6(1):13-9
pubmed: 12495746
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2015 Apr;32:121-129
pubmed: 25553537
Bioinformatics. 2020 Apr 15;36(8):2628-2629
pubmed: 31882993
BMC Genomics. 2020 May 20;21(1):368
pubmed: 32434522
Cell. 2010 Apr 30;141(3):550, 550.e1-2
pubmed: 20434991
Cell. 2009 Aug 21;138(4):738-49
pubmed: 19703399
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jan 15;31(2):166-9
pubmed: 25260700
Plants (Basel). 2017 May 27;6(2):
pubmed: 28555003
Science. 2008 Dec 19;322(5909):1832-5
pubmed: 19095940
Science. 2013 Nov 1;342(6158):628-32
pubmed: 24030492
Int J Food Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;56(3):1184-1192
pubmed: 33776229
Plant Growth Regul. 2020;90(3):441-453
pubmed: 32214568
Crop Sci. 2020 May-Jun;60(3):1450-1461
pubmed: 32742003
Plant J. 2019 Nov;100(3):522-535
pubmed: 31310397
Breed Sci. 2016 Sep;66(4):560-571
pubmed: 27795681
FEBS Lett. 2004 Jan 16;557(1-3):259-64
pubmed: 14741378
Plant Mol Biol. 2004 Nov;56(4):503-16
pubmed: 15630615
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 May;34(5):562-70
pubmed: 27088722
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 28;109(9):3582-7
pubmed: 22334645
Plant J. 2020 Nov;104(3):768-780
pubmed: 32799402
BMC Plant Biol. 2019 Nov 4;19(1):468
pubmed: 31684864
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
Plant Mol Biol. 2021 Jun;106(3):285-296
pubmed: 33855676
Nature. 2012 Mar 21;484(7393):242-245
pubmed: 22437497
Plant Reprod. 2019 Jun;32(2):181-191
pubmed: 30543044
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jul 23;11:1107
pubmed: 32793264
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Oct 16;19(10):
pubmed: 30332820
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 21;16(7):e0253555
pubmed: 34288936
Plant Mol Biol. 2022 Jun;109(3):233-248
pubmed: 32902791
Curr Top Dev Biol. 2013;105:125-52
pubmed: 23962841
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D1167-71
pubmed: 26476447
Plant Cell. 2008 Feb;20(2):292-306
pubmed: 18296627
BMC Genet. 2015 Sep 23;16:115
pubmed: 26395668
Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 1;29(1):15-21
pubmed: 23104886
Dev Cell. 2009 Aug;17(2):268-78
pubmed: 19686687
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Nov 30;14:318
pubmed: 25433671
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2015;66:441-64
pubmed: 25534513
Front Plant Sci. 2021 May 28;12:666266
pubmed: 34122486
New Phytol. 2021 May;230(3):938-942
pubmed: 33474759
Science. 2013 Feb 8;339(6120):704-7
pubmed: 23393265
Development. 2011 Oct;138(19):4117-29
pubmed: 21896627
Cell. 2009 Aug 21;138(4):750-9
pubmed: 19703400
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 28;12(7):e0181460
pubmed: 28753668
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 14;14(11):e0224920
pubmed: 31725759
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 28;15(1):e0227199
pubmed: 31990916
Trends Plant Sci. 2013 Feb;18(2):59-64
pubmed: 23040086
Front Plant Sci. 2015 May 27;6:389
pubmed: 26074947
Plant Genome. 2017 Nov;10(3):
pubmed: 29293806