Structural communication between the GTPase Sec4p and its activator Sec2p: Determinants of GEF activity and early deformations to nucleotide release.
Guanine nucleotide exchange factor
Molecular dynamics simulations
Protein structure network
Protein–protein docking
Ras GTPases
Structural communication
Journal
Computational and structural biotechnology journal
ISSN: 2001-0370
Titre abrégé: Comput Struct Biotechnol J
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101585369
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
19
07
2022
revised:
08
09
2022
accepted:
08
09
2022
entrez:
3
10
2022
pubmed:
4
10
2022
medline:
4
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ras GTPases are molecular switches that cycle between OFF and ON states depending on the bound nucleotide (i.e. GDP-bound and GTP-bound, respectively). The Rab GTPase, Sec4p, plays regulatory roles in multiple steps of intracellular vesicle trafficking. Nucleotide release is catalyzed by the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor (GEF) Sec2p. Here, the integration of structural information with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations addressed a number of questions concerning the intrinsic and stimulated dynamics of Sec2p and Sec4p as well as the chain of structural deformations leading to GEF-assisted activation of the Rab GTPase. Sec2p holds an intrinsic ability to adopt the conformation found in the crystallographic complexes with Sec4p, thus suggesting that the latter selects and shifts the conformational equilibrium towards a pre-existing bound-like conformation of Sec2p. The anchoring of Sec4p to a suitable conformation of Sec2p favors the Sec2p-assisted pulling on itself of the α1/switch 1 (SWI) loop and of SWI, which loose any contact with GDP. Those deformations of Sec4p would occur earlier. Formation of the final Sec2p-Sec4p hydrophobic interface, accomplishes later. Disruption of the nucleotide cage would cause firstly loss of interactions with the guanine ring and secondly loss of interactions with the phosphates. The ease in sampling the energy landscape and adopting a bound-like conformation likely favors the catalyzing ability of GEFs for Ras GTPases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36187918
doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.09.016
pii: S2001-0370(22)00421-4
pmc: PMC9508438
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
5162-5180Informations de copyright
© 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Mol Cell. 2007 Feb 9;25(3):455-62
pubmed: 17289591
Biophys J. 2005 Dec;89(6):4159-70
pubmed: 16150969
PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(8):e1003207
pubmed: 24009494
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 8;103(32):11821-7
pubmed: 16882731
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Feb;6(2):167-80
pubmed: 15688002
Protein Sci. 2006 Sep;15(9):2120-8
pubmed: 16882992
J Biosci. 2007 Aug;32(5):891-8
pubmed: 17914231
Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2:2006.0019
pubmed: 16738564
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jul 8;44(W1):W344-50
pubmed: 27166375
Science. 2001 Nov 9;294(5545):1299-304
pubmed: 11701921
J Mol Biol. 2007 Oct 19;373(2):503-19
pubmed: 17825317
J Chem Theory Comput. 2008 Mar;4(3):435-47
pubmed: 26620784
J Am Chem Soc. 2008 Apr 2;130(13):4310-25
pubmed: 18335928
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(11):e1002749
pubmed: 23133356
Annu Rev Biochem. 2011;80:943-71
pubmed: 21675921
J Chem Inf Model. 2019 Oct 28;59(10):4300-4313
pubmed: 31490066
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 15;104(20):8305-10
pubmed: 17488829
Proteins. 2007 May 1;67(2):350-9
pubmed: 17311346
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022 Jan 07;20:640-649
pubmed: 35140884
Cell Signal. 2009 Nov;21(11):1569-78
pubmed: 19560536
Structure. 2007 Feb;15(2):245-52
pubmed: 17292842
J Mol Biol. 2000 Dec 8;304(4):585-98
pubmed: 11099382
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Jul 2;48(W1):W94-W103
pubmed: 32427333
Methods Enzymol. 2011;487:545-74
pubmed: 21187238
Nature. 2018 Jun;558(7711):553-558
pubmed: 29899450
J Mol Biol. 2007 Feb 2;365(5):1359-67
pubmed: 17134721
Nature. 1993 Dec 16;366(6456):654-63
pubmed: 8259210
Nature. 2011 Jul 19;477(7366):549-55
pubmed: 21772288
Proteins. 1993 Dec;17(4):412-25
pubmed: 8108382
J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Nov 2;127(43):15127-37
pubmed: 16248653
Sci STKE. 2004 Sep 07;2004(250):RE13
pubmed: 15367757
J Chem Theory Comput. 2013 May 14;9(5):2504-18
pubmed: 26583738
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Oct 28;94(22):11905-10
pubmed: 9342335
BMC Struct Biol. 2015 Aug 12;15:14
pubmed: 26263895
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Mar;7(3):e1001098
pubmed: 21390270
J R Soc Interface. 2015 Nov 6;12(112):
pubmed: 26577596
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22477
pubmed: 21829626
Chem Sci. 2022 Jan 13;13(7):2001-2010
pubmed: 35308861
Structure. 2010 Mar 10;18(3):402-14
pubmed: 20223222
J Comput Chem. 2022 May 15;43(13):906-916
pubmed: 35324017
Science. 2015 Jun 19;348(6241):1361-5
pubmed: 26089515
J Chem Inf Model. 2015 Sep 28;55(9):1878-93
pubmed: 26322553
Nat Struct Biol. 2002 Jun;9(6):468-75
pubmed: 12006984
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Mar 19;99(6):3575-80
pubmed: 11904419
Cell. 2007 Jun 1;129(5):865-77
pubmed: 17540168
Biophys J. 2004 Sep;87(3):1426-35
pubmed: 15345525
Chem Rev. 2011 Dec 14;111(12):PR438-535
pubmed: 22165845
J Mol Biol. 2003 Aug 1;331(1):281-99
pubmed: 12875852
Protein Sci. 2005 May;14(5):1328-39
pubmed: 15802647
Structure. 2008 Jun;16(6):885-96
pubmed: 18547521
Biophys J. 2005 Apr;88(4):2472-93
pubmed: 15665128
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Mar;5(3):e1000325
pubmed: 19300489
J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 Feb 14;13(2):886-899
pubmed: 28001387
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Aug;5(8):e1000480
pubmed: 19714202
Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2009 Apr;10(2):146-60
pubmed: 19355982
J Chem Phys. 2007 Jan 7;126(1):014101
pubmed: 17212484
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2013;31(2):142-57
pubmed: 22849539
J Mol Biol. 1997 Nov 21;274(1):114-31
pubmed: 9398520
J Comput Chem. 2011 Apr 30;32(6):1183-94
pubmed: 21387345
J Comput Chem. 2003 Jul 15;24(9):1016-25
pubmed: 12759902