Performance evaluation of the FAST™ System and the FAST-PBC Prep™ cartridges for speeded-up positive blood culture testing.

FAST™ System Qvella bacteremia direct MALDI-TOF MS direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing positive blood cultures rapid resistance detection testing

Journal

Frontiers in microbiology
ISSN: 1664-302X
Titre abrégé: Front Microbiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548977

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 30 06 2022
accepted: 26 08 2022
entrez: 3 10 2022
pubmed: 4 10 2022
medline: 4 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

As time to appropriate antimicrobial therapy is major to reduce sepsis mortality, there is great interest in the development of tools for direct identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of positive blood cultures (PBC). Very recently, the FAST™ System (Qvella) has been developed to isolate and concentrate microorganisms directly from PBCs, resulting in the recovery of a Liquid Colony™ (LC) within 30 min. The LC can be used as equivalent of an overnight subcultured colony for downstream testing. We aimed to evaluate the performances of the FAST™ System and FAST-PBC Prep™ cartridges by testing the resulting LC for direct ID, AST and rapid resistance detection. Prospectively, FAST™ System testing was carried out on each patient's first PBC with a monomicrobial Gram-stain result. In the second arm of the study, FAST™ System testing was carried out on blood cultures spiked with multidrug-resistant bacteria. Downstream testing using the LC included MALDI-TOF MS ID with the Bruker Biotyper FAST™ System testing was completed on 198 prospective PBCs and 80 spiked blood cultures. After exclusion of polymicrobial blood cultures, performance evaluation compared with standard of care results was carried out on 266 PBCs. Concordant, erroneous and no ID results included 238/266 (89.5%), 1/266 (0.4%), 27/266 (10.2%) PBCs, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for PBP2a were 100% (10/10) and 75% (15/20), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for βLT were 95.8% (23/24) and 100% (42/42), respectively. Categorical agreement for all 160 tested strains was 98% (2299/2346) with 1.2% (8/657) very major errors and 0.7% (10/1347) major errors. FAST™ System testing is a reliable approach for direct downstream testing of PBCs including MALDI-TOF MS ID, BD Phoenix™ and Bio-Rad disk diffusion AST as well as rapid resistance testing assays. Next steps include optimal integration of the FAST™ System in the PBC workflow with a view toward clinical studies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36187982
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.982650
pmc: PMC9520742
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

982650

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Verroken, Hajji, Bressant, Couvreur, Anantharajah and Rodriguez-Villalobos.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;40(1):151-157
pubmed: 32860091
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Jan;39(1):139-149
pubmed: 31641972
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Dec 26;56(1):
pubmed: 29118168
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Sep;24(9):935-943
pubmed: 29605563
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Jan;72(1):20-31
pubmed: 22030102
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 10;8:635831
pubmed: 33777978
PLoS One. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0156299
pubmed: 27228001
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Feb;34(2):405-13
pubmed: 25252627
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Apr;36(4):681-687
pubmed: 27889878
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 May 18;60(5):e0253321
pubmed: 35387489
New Microbes New Infect. 2015 Jun 09;8:1-3
pubmed: 26380714
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Feb;26(2):142-150
pubmed: 31760113
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 26;14(9):e0223122
pubmed: 31557233
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0046221
pubmed: 34319135
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Sep;24(9):944-955
pubmed: 29787889
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2018 Oct;36(8):484-492
pubmed: 29110928
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jun;94(2):116-121
pubmed: 30711413
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):989
pubmed: 31752735
Infect Dis Now. 2021 Aug;51(5):470-476
pubmed: 34366083
J Med Microbiol. 2018 Sep;67(9):1253-1256
pubmed: 30028662

Auteurs

Alexia Verroken (A)

Department of Microbiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Chaima Hajji (C)

Department of Microbiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Florian Bressant (F)

Department of Microbiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Jonathan Couvreur (J)

Department of Microbiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Ahalieyah Anantharajah (A)

Department of Microbiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Hector Rodriguez-Villalobos (H)

Department of Microbiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH