Influence of the molecular weight and size distribution of PSS on mixed ionic-electronic transport in PEDOT:PSS.
Journal
Polymer chemistry
ISSN: 1759-9954
Titre abrégé: Polym Chem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101562526
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
entrez:
3
10
2022
pubmed:
4
10
2022
medline:
4
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The commercially available polyelectrolyte complex poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) is ubiquitous in organic and hybrid electronics. As such, it has often been used as a benchmark material for fundamental studies and the development of new electronic devices. Yet, most studies on PEDOT:PSS have focused on its electronic conductivity in dry environments, with less consideration given to its ion transport, coupled ionic-electronic transport, and charge storage properties in aqueous environments. These properties are essential for applications in bioelectronics (sensors, actuators), charge storage devices, and electrochromic displays. Importantly, past studies on mixed ionic-electronic transport in PEDOT:PSS neglected to consider how the molecular structure of PSS affects mixed ionic-electronic transport. Herein, we therefore investigated the effect of the molecular weight and size distribution of PSS on the electronic properties and morphology of PEDOT:PSS both in dry and aqueous environments, and overall performance in organic electrochemical transistors (OECTs). Using reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization with two different chain transfer agents, six PSS samples with monomodal, narrow (
Identifiants
pubmed: 36189107
doi: 10.1039/d2py00271j
pmc: PMC9523623
mid: NIHMS1793983
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2764-2775Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P20 GM104316
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of interest The authors declare no competing financial interest. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Références
Nat Commun. 2016 Apr 19;7:11287
pubmed: 27090156
ACS Macro Lett. 2019 Jul 16;8(7):859-864
pubmed: 35619513
Nat Mater. 2020 Jan;19(1):13-26
pubmed: 31427743
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2133
pubmed: 23851620
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2010 Jun;2(6):1588-93
pubmed: 20481442
J Neural Eng. 2006 Mar;3(1):59-70
pubmed: 16510943
Nat Mater. 2017 Apr;16(4):414-418
pubmed: 28218920
Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 21;9(1):3858
pubmed: 30242224
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017 Apr 5;9(13):11732-11738
pubmed: 28293952
ACS Macro Lett. 2020 Apr 21;9(4):459-463
pubmed: 35648502
Adv Mater. 2013 May 28;25(20):2831-6
pubmed: 23606373
Adv Mater. 2015 Nov 25;27(44):7176-80
pubmed: 26456708
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 24;8(1):1767
pubmed: 29176599
Front Neurosci. 2020 May 19;14:405
pubmed: 32508562
Adv Intell Syst. 2020 Apr;2(4):
pubmed: 32656536
Sci Adv. 2015 May 22;1(4):e1400251
pubmed: 26601178
Adv Mater. 2016 Jun;28(22):4455-61
pubmed: 26460551
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016 Dec 21;8(50):34303-34308
pubmed: 27998145
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017 May 31;9(21):18254-18262
pubmed: 28485142
RSC Adv. 2019 Feb 21;9(11):6363-6378
pubmed: 35517248
RSC Adv. 2019 Jan 30;9(7):4028-4034
pubmed: 35518098
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019 May 15;11(19):17570-17582
pubmed: 30983315
Adv Mater. 2018 Feb;30(5):
pubmed: 29266473
Science. 1995 Aug 25;269(5227):1086-8
pubmed: 17755530
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021 Mar 17;13(10):11774-11782
pubmed: 33683859