Electrosurgical knife with the water-jet function of tip-type during endoscopic treatment injection.
desktop experiment
electrosurgical knife
endoscopic submucosal dissection
injection
porcine model
Journal
DEN open
ISSN: 2692-4609
Titre abrégé: DEN Open
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9918317682706676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
06
07
2022
revised:
20
08
2022
accepted:
28
08
2022
entrez:
3
10
2022
pubmed:
4
10
2022
medline:
4
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to objectively evaluate the water-jet-functioned electrosurgical knife injection performances in a desktop experiment. Five types of water-jet-functioned electrosurgical knives, including two injection styles of sheath-type (A: DualKnife J, KD-655L; B: FlushKnife, DK2620-J-B20S; C: Splash M-Knife, DN-D2718B; D: ISSEN, SN1650-20) and tip-type (E: ORISE ProKnife, M00519361) were evaluated. These knives were compared with an injection needle (Control: SuperGrip 25G) as a control. The injection speed under constant pressure and the injection efficiency for each knife against prepared porcine stomach mucosa were evaluated. The additional clear gel injections using an injection needle were observed using an indigo blue-colored gel to evaluate the difference between the locations of water-jet holes. Four types of knives, except for A, showed significantly higher water-jet speeds (A: 0.79 ± 0.03 g/20 s, B: 2.56 ± 0.05 g/20 s, C: 3.09 ± 0.06 g/20 s, D: 2.86 ± 0.05 g/20 s, and E: 1.79 ± 0.03 g/20 s) compared to that of the control (1.21 ± 0.03 g/20 s). Meanwhile, significantly higher efficacy of injection was found in the tip-type water-jet function knife, second to the injection needle (Control: 37.2% ± 35.5%, A: 20.9% ± 20.2%, B: 1.1% ± 2.2%, C: 6.2% ± 12.6%, D: 12.5% ± 15.6%, and E: 33.3% ± 32.2%). An additional injection experiment revealed that the injection with a piercing tip into the gel could achieve sufficient additional injection inside the stacked clear gel. The tip-type water-jet function electrosurgical knife is preferable for effective submucosal injection during endoscopic treatments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36189167
doi: 10.1002/deo2.165
pii: DEO2165
pmc: PMC9490017
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e165Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. DEN Open published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
MF received a research grant from Fujifilm Corporation, HOYA Corporation, and Olympus Corporation and a lecture honoraria from Fujifilm Corporation and Olympus Corporation outside the submitted work.
Références
Dig Endosc. 2021 Jan;33(1):4-20
pubmed: 33107115
Endosc Int Open. 2022 May 13;10(5):E694-E702
pubmed: 35571471
Endoscopy. 2016 Nov;48(11):1010-1015
pubmed: 27448050
Endoscopy. 2004 Jul;36(7):584-9
pubmed: 15243879
Dig Endosc. 2020 Jan;32(2):219-239
pubmed: 31566804
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2021 Jan;113(1):52-59
pubmed: 33222480
Anaesthesia. 1976 Mar;31(2):273-5
pubmed: 779509
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 May;67(5):1521-1538
pubmed: 35246802
Dig Endosc. 2015 Jan;27(2):197-204
pubmed: 25394216
Dig Endosc. 2020 Sep;32(6):882-887
pubmed: 32415998
Dig Endosc. 2020 May;32(4):452-493
pubmed: 32072683
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Feb;63(2):243-9
pubmed: 16427929
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 1;56(6):465-477
pubmed: 35357336
Dig Endosc. 2018 Sep;30(5):563-579
pubmed: 30022514