The impact of implant-related characteristics on dental implant blooming: An in vitro study.
artifacts
blooming
cone-beam computed tomography
dental implants
imaging
inaccuracy
volumetric alteration
Journal
Clinical oral implants research
ISSN: 1600-0501
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Implants Res
Pays: Denmark
ID NLM: 9105713
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
revised:
22
08
2022
received:
31
03
2022
accepted:
20
09
2022
pubmed:
4
10
2022
medline:
15
12
2022
entrez:
3
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess, in vitro, variables potentially influencing implant blooming using a human-like imaging phantom and 3D-printed mandibles. Sixty implants were inserted in 3D-printed mandibles in 26 different configurations in order to examine the impact of implant diameter, presence of a cover screw, implant design/material, implant position, and the presence of additional implants on implant blooming using two cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices (Accuitomo [ACC] and NewTom [NWT]). Two observers measured the amount of implant blooming in both buccolingual and mesiodistal directions. Inter-rater agreement and descriptive statistics, grouped by implant characteristic and CBCT device, were calculated. Both CBCT devices increased implant diameter (a mean increase of 9.2% and 11.8% for titanium, 20.3% and 24.4% for zirconium, for ACC and NWT, respectively). An increase in implant diameter did not increase the amount of blooming, whereas placing a cover screw did (from 8.0% to 10.9% for ACC, and from 10.0% to 15.6% for NWT). Moreover, implant design, anatomical region, and the presence of another implant also affected the extent of the blooming. Dental implants show a clear diameter increase on CBCT, with the effect being more pronounced for zirconium than for titanium implants. Similar effects are likely to occur in the clinical setting, potentially masking nonosseointegration, reducing the dimensions of peri-implant defects, and/or causing underestimation of the buccal bone thickness.
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Titanium
D1JT611TNE
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1199-1211Informations de copyright
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Bender, P., Salvi, G. E., Buser, D., Sculean, A., & Bornstein, M. M. (2017). Correlation of three-dimensional radiologic data with subsequent treatment approach in patients with peri-implantitis: A retrospective analysis. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 37(4), 481-489. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2844
Benic, G. I., Mokti, M., Chen, C.-J., Weber, H.-P., Hämmerle, C. H. F., & Gallucci, G. O. (2012). Dimensions of buccal bone and mucosa at immediately placed implants after 7 years: A clinical and cone beam computed tomography study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(5), 560-566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02253.x
Bornstein, M. M., Al-Nawas, B., Kuchler, U., & Tahmaseb, A. (2014). Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding contemporary surgical and radiographic techniques in implant dentistry. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 29, 78-82. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2013.g1
Carter, J. B., Stone, J. D., Clark, R. S., & Mercer, J. E. (2016). Applications of cone-beam computed tomography in Oral and maxillofacial surgery: An overview of published indications and clinical usage in United States academic centers and Oral and maxillofacial surgery practices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 74(4), 668-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.10.018
Celikten, B., Jacobs, R., de Faria Vasconcelos, K., Huang, Y., Shaheen, E., Nicolielo, L. F. P., & Orhan, K. (2019). Comparative evaluation of cone beam CT and micro-CT on blooming artifacts in human teeth filled with bioceramic sealers. Clinical Oral Investigations, 23(8), 3267-3273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2748-8
Chappuis, V., Bornstein, M. M., Buser, D., & Belser, U. (2016). Influence of implant neck design on facial bone crest dimensions in the esthetic zone analyzed by cone beam CT: A comparative study with a 5-to-9-year follow-up. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 27(9), 1055-1064. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12692
Chappuis, V., Rahman, L., Buser, R., Janner, S. F. M., Belser, U. C., & Buser, D. (2018). Effectiveness of contour augmentation with guided bone regeneration: 10-year results. Journal of Dental Research, 97(3), 266-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517737755
Codari, M., de Faria Vasconcelos, K., Ferreira Pinheiro Nicolielo, L., Haiter Neto, F., & Jacobs, R. (2017). Quantitative evaluation of metal artifacts using different CBCT devices, high-density materials and field of views. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28(12), 1509-1514. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13019
Coelho-Silva, F., Gaêta-Araujo, H., Rosado, L. P. L., Freitas, D. Q., Haiter-Neto, F., & de Azevedo-Vaz, S. L. (2021). Distortion or magnification? An in vitro cone-beam CT study of dimensional changes of objects with different compositions. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology, 50(8), 20210063. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210063
Coelho-Silva, F., Martins, L. A. C., Braga, D. A., Zandonade, E., Haiter-Neto, F., & de Azevedo-Vaz, S. L. (2020). Influence of windowing and metal artefact reduction algorithms on the volumetric dimensions of five different high-density materials: A cone-beam CT study. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology, 49(8), 20200039. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200039
dos Corpas, L. S., Jacobs, R., Quirynen, M., Huang, Y., Naert, I., & Duyck, J. (2011). Peri-implant bone tissue assessment by comparing the outcome of intra-oral radiograph and cone beam computed tomography analyses to the histological standard. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 22(5), 492-499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02029.x
de Faria Vasconcelos, K., Queiroz, P. M., Codari, M., Pinheiro Nicolielo, L. F., Freitas, D. Q., Jacobs, R., & Haiter-Neto, F. (2020). A quantitative analysis of metal artifact reduction algorithm performance in volume correction with 3 CBCT devices. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, 130(3), 328-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2020.03.049
Demirturk Kocasarac, H., Ustaoglu, G., Bayrak, S., Katkar, R., Geha, H., Deahl, S. T., Mealey, B. L., Danaci, M., & Noujeim, M. (2019). Evaluation of artifacts generated by titanium, zirconium, and titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants on MRI, CT, and CBCT images: A phantom study. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, 127(6), 535-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2019.01.074
Draenert, F. G., Coppenrath, E., Herzog, P., Müller, S., & Mueller-Lisse, U. G. (2007). Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology, 36(4), 198-203. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/32579161
Fontenele, R. C., Nascimento, E. H., Vasconcelos, T. V., Noujeim, M., & Freitas, D. Q. (2018). Magnitude of cone beam CT image artifacts related to zirconium and titanium implants: Impact on image quality. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology, 47(6), 20180021. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180021
Gaêta-Araujo, H., Nascimento, E. H. L., Fontenele, R. C., Mancini, A. X. M., Freitas, D. Q., & Oliveira-Santos, C. (2020). Magnitude of beam-hardening artifacts produced by gutta-percha and metal posts on cone-beam computed tomography with varying tube current. Imaging Science in Dentistry, 50(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2020.50.1.1
Hoffmann, U., Ferencik, M., Cury, R. C., & Pena, A. J. (2006). Coronary CT angiography. Journal of Nuclear Medicine: Official Publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 47(5), 797-806.
Jacobs, R., Salmon, B., Codari, M., Hassan, B., & Bornstein, M. M. (2018). Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: Recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health, 18(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5
Jacobs, R., Vranckx, M., Vanderstuyft, T., Quirynen, M., & Salmon, B. (2018). CBCT vs other imaging modalities to assess peri-implant bone and diagnose complications: A systematic review. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 11, s77-s92.
Jones, D. E. A., & Raine, H. C. (1949). Correspondence. The British Journal of Radiology, 22(261), 549-550. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-22-261-549-b
Kim, Y. H., Lee, C., Han, S.-S., Jeon, K. J., Choi, Y. J., & Lee, A. (2020). Quantitative analysis of metal artifact reduction using the auto-edge counting method in cone-beam computed tomography. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 8872. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65644-3
Maes, F., Collignon, A., Vandermeulen, D., Marchal, G., & Suetens, P. (1997). Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 16(2), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.563664
Nackaerts, O., Maes, F., Yan, H., Couto Souza, P., Pauwels, R., & Jacobs, R. (2011). Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 22(8), 873-879. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02076.x
Oenning, A. C., Pauwels, R., Stratis, A., De Faria Vasconcelos, K., Tijskens, E., De Grauwe, A., Dimitra Research Group, Jacobs, R., & Salmon, B. (2019). Halve the dose while maintaining image quality in paediatric cone beam CT. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 5521. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41949-w
Pauwels, R., Jacobs, R., Bogaerts, R., Bosmans, H., & Panmekiate, S. (2016). Reduction of scatter-induced image noise in cone beam computed tomography: Effect of field of view size and position. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, 121(2), 188-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.10.017
Pauwels, R., Jacobs, R., Singer, S. R., & Mupparapu, M. (2015). CBCT-based bone quality assessment: Are Hounsfield units applicable? Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology, 44(1), 20140238. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140238
Pauwels, R., Seynaeve, L., Henriques, J. C. G., de Oliveira-Santos, C., Souza, P. C., Westphalen, F. H., Rubira-Bullen, I. R. F., Ribeiro-Rotta, R. F., Rockenbach, M. I. B., Haiter-Neto, F., Pittayapat, P., Bosmans, H., Bogaerts, R., & Jacobs, R. (2015). Optimization of dental CBCT exposures through mAs reduction. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology, 44(9), 20150108. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20150108
Pelekos, G., Acharya, A., Tonetti, M. S., & Bornstein, M. M. (2018). Diagnostic performance of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 29(5), 443-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13143
Sancho-Puchades, M., Hämmerle, C. H. F., & Benic, G. I. (2015). In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium, titanium-zirconium and zirconium dioxide implants in cone-beam computed tomography. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 26(10), 1222-1228. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12438
Scarfe, W. C., & Farman, A. G. (2008). What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dental Clinics of North America, 52(4), 707-730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.005
Schriber, M., Yeung, A. W. K., Suter, V. G. A., Buser, D., Leung, Y. Y., & Bornstein, M. M. (2020). Cone beam computed tomography artefacts around dental implants with different materials influencing the detection of peri-implant bone defects. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 31(7), 595-606. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13596
Schulze, R., Heil, U., Gross, D., Bruellmann, D. D., Dranischnikow, E., Schwanecke, U., & Schoemer, E. (2011). Artefacts in CBCT: A review. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology, 40(5), 265-273. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/30642039
Vanderstuyft, T., Tarce, M., Sanaan, B., Jacobs, R., de Faria Vasconcelos, K., & Quirynen, M. (2019). Inaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone-beam CT due to implant blooming: An ex-vivo study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 46(11), 1134-1143. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13183
Wanderley, V. A., de Faria Vasconcelos, K., Leite, A. F., Pauwels, R., Shujaat, S., Jacobs, R., & Oliveira, M. L. (2021). Impact of the blooming artefact on dental implant dimensions in 13 cone-beam computed tomography devices. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 7(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00347-6
Zhang, G., Marshall, N., Jacobs, R., Liu, Q., & Bosmans, H. (2013). Bowtie filtration for dedicated cone beam CT of the head and neck: A simulation study. The British Journal of Radiology, 86(1028), 20130002. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20130002