Racial and Ethnic Differences in Outcomes of a 12-Week Digital Rehabilitation Program for Musculoskeletal Pain: Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.
digital therapy
diversity
eHealth
equity
ethnicity
mobile phone
musculoskeletal conditions
pain
physical therapy
race
telehealth
telerehabilitation
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 10 2022
31 10 2022
Historique:
received:
21
07
2022
accepted:
30
09
2022
revised:
14
09
2022
pubmed:
4
10
2022
medline:
3
11
2022
entrez:
3
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain disproportionately affects people from different ethnic backgrounds through higher burden and less access to care. Digital care programs (DCPs) can improve access and help reduce inequities. However, the outcomes of such programs based on race and ethnicity have yet to be studied. We aimed to assess the impact of race and ethnicity on engagement and outcomes in a multimodal DCP for MSK pain. This was an ad hoc analysis of an ongoing decentralized single-arm investigation into engagement and clinical-related outcomes after a multimodal DCP in patients with MSK conditions. Patients were stratified by self-reported racial and ethnic group, and their engagement and outcome changes between baseline and 12 weeks were compared using latent growth curve analysis. Outcomes included program engagement (number of sessions), self-reported pain scores, likelihood of surgery, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale, Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment. A minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of 30% was calculated for pain, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate race as an independent predictor of meeting the MCID. A total of 6949 patients completed the program: 65.5% (4554/6949) of them were non-Hispanic White, 10.8% (749/6949) were Black, 9.7% (673/6949) were Asian, 9.2% (636/6949) were Hispanic, and 4.8% (337/6949) were of other racial or ethnic backgrounds. The population studied was diverse and followed the proportions of the US population. All groups reported high engagement and satisfaction, with Hispanic and Black patients ranking first among satisfaction despite lower engagement. Black patients had a higher likelihood to drop out (odds ratio [OR] 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.40, P=.04) than non-Hispanic White patients. Hispanic and Black patients reported the highest level of pain, surgical intent, work productivity, and impairment in activities of daily living at baseline. All race groups showed a significant improvement in all outcomes, with Black and Hispanic patients reporting the greatest improvements in clinical outcomes. Hispanic patients also had the highest response rate for pain (75.8%) and a higher OR of meeting the pain MCID (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.24-2.45, P=.001), when compared with non-Hispanic White patients, independent of age, BMI, sex, therapy type, education level, and employment status. No differences in mental health outcomes were found between race and ethnic groups. This study advocates for the utility of a DCP in improving access to MSK care and promoting health equity. Engagement and satisfaction rates were high in all the groups. Black and Hispanic patients had higher MSK burden at baseline and lower engagement but also reported higher improvements, with Hispanic patients presenting a higher likelihood of pain improvement.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain disproportionately affects people from different ethnic backgrounds through higher burden and less access to care. Digital care programs (DCPs) can improve access and help reduce inequities. However, the outcomes of such programs based on race and ethnicity have yet to be studied.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to assess the impact of race and ethnicity on engagement and outcomes in a multimodal DCP for MSK pain.
METHODS
This was an ad hoc analysis of an ongoing decentralized single-arm investigation into engagement and clinical-related outcomes after a multimodal DCP in patients with MSK conditions. Patients were stratified by self-reported racial and ethnic group, and their engagement and outcome changes between baseline and 12 weeks were compared using latent growth curve analysis. Outcomes included program engagement (number of sessions), self-reported pain scores, likelihood of surgery, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale, Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment. A minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of 30% was calculated for pain, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate race as an independent predictor of meeting the MCID.
RESULTS
A total of 6949 patients completed the program: 65.5% (4554/6949) of them were non-Hispanic White, 10.8% (749/6949) were Black, 9.7% (673/6949) were Asian, 9.2% (636/6949) were Hispanic, and 4.8% (337/6949) were of other racial or ethnic backgrounds. The population studied was diverse and followed the proportions of the US population. All groups reported high engagement and satisfaction, with Hispanic and Black patients ranking first among satisfaction despite lower engagement. Black patients had a higher likelihood to drop out (odds ratio [OR] 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.40, P=.04) than non-Hispanic White patients. Hispanic and Black patients reported the highest level of pain, surgical intent, work productivity, and impairment in activities of daily living at baseline. All race groups showed a significant improvement in all outcomes, with Black and Hispanic patients reporting the greatest improvements in clinical outcomes. Hispanic patients also had the highest response rate for pain (75.8%) and a higher OR of meeting the pain MCID (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.24-2.45, P=.001), when compared with non-Hispanic White patients, independent of age, BMI, sex, therapy type, education level, and employment status. No differences in mental health outcomes were found between race and ethnic groups.
CONCLUSIONS
This study advocates for the utility of a DCP in improving access to MSK care and promoting health equity. Engagement and satisfaction rates were high in all the groups. Black and Hispanic patients had higher MSK burden at baseline and lower engagement but also reported higher improvements, with Hispanic patients presenting a higher likelihood of pain improvement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36189963
pii: v24i10e41306
doi: 10.2196/41306
pmc: PMC9664333
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e41306Informations de copyright
©Justin Scheer, Fabíola Costa, Maria Molinos, Anabela Areias, Dora Janela, Robert G Moulder, Jorge Lains, Virgílio Bento, Vijay Yanamadala, Steven P Cohen, Fernando Dias Correia. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 31.10.2022.
Références
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):90-4
pubmed: 18165753
Br J Sports Med. 2022 Jan;56(1):41-50
pubmed: 33849907
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Nov 30;:1-10
pubmed: 34846264
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 24;8(6):e15375
pubmed: 32357128
Phys Ther. 2021 Jun 1;101(6):
pubmed: 33561280
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Jun 21;6(1):e14523
pubmed: 31228176
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Dec 9;27(12):1949-1954
pubmed: 32866249
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 28;18(19):
pubmed: 34639534
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 Jan;74(1):79-88
pubmed: 34553507
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2021 May;32(2):419-428
pubmed: 33814066
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Oct;80(5):932-954
pubmed: 32855565
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
Pain Med. 2012 Nov;13(11):1499-508
pubmed: 22994358
Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):2006-2017
pubmed: 33275908
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7
pubmed: 16717171
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 1;23(9):e29959
pubmed: 34351865
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Feb 28;6(1):e13111
pubmed: 30816849
Pain. 2011 May;152(5):1001-1006
pubmed: 21277087
Rehabil Nurs. 2021 Mar-Apr 01;46(2):63-64
pubmed: 33646726
J Clin Med. 2022 May 06;11(9):
pubmed: 35566735
Spine J. 2013 Aug;13(8):889-93
pubmed: 23523434
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Jan;67(1):93-99
pubmed: 33507442
Phys Ther. 2020 Aug 12;100(8):1260-1264
pubmed: 32386218
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020 Aug;48:102193
pubmed: 32560876
Pain Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):181-209
pubmed: 33575952
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2022 Feb;26(2):129-137
pubmed: 35179723
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 26;8(1):11299
pubmed: 30050087
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Feb;30(2):1007-1010
pubmed: 34668075
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):481-91
pubmed: 24141874
Eur Spine J. 2017 Aug;26(8):2007-2013
pubmed: 28646454
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Feb 01;21(2):e171-85
pubmed: 25880491
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jan;27(1):60-75
pubmed: 28429142
J Pain Res. 2022 Jan 08;15:53-66
pubmed: 35035234
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 8;16(10):e0258452
pubmed: 34624059
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jan 4;23(1):29
pubmed: 34983488
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jan 19;93(2):113-20
pubmed: 21248209
J Behav Med. 2013 Jun;36(3):246-58
pubmed: 22476813
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Nov;51(11):CPG1-CPG60
pubmed: 34719942
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Jun;24(5):341-355
pubmed: 28403669
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Mar 1;101(3):237-249
pubmed: 33935152
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jun 17;11:124
pubmed: 20565719
Physiotherapy. 2020 Jun;107:19-27
pubmed: 32026820
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):361-70
pubmed: 26230650
J Pain. 2020 Mar - Apr;21(3-4):409-417
pubmed: 31487562
Orthop Nurs. 2022 Mar-Apr 01;41(2):103-115
pubmed: 35358128
J Cancer Surviv. 2022 Feb;16(1):44-51
pubmed: 34800257
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Mar 28;14(1):42
pubmed: 28351367
Braz J Phys Ther. 2020 Sep - Oct;24(5):381-383
pubmed: 32387004
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Apr 23;15:134
pubmed: 24755158
J Telemed Telecare. 2020 Dec;26(10):581-589
pubmed: 31213166