Defending Earth's terrestrial microbiome.
Journal
Nature microbiology
ISSN: 2058-5276
Titre abrégé: Nat Microbiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101674869
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
received:
19
03
2021
accepted:
17
08
2022
pubmed:
4
10
2022
medline:
1
11
2022
entrez:
3
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Microbial life represents the majority of Earth's biodiversity. Across disparate disciplines from medicine to forestry, scientists continue to discover how the microbiome drives essential, macro-scale processes in plants, animals and entire ecosystems. Yet, there is an emerging realization that Earth's microbial biodiversity is under threat. Here we advocate for the conservation and restoration of soil microbial life, as well as active incorporation of microbial biodiversity into managed food and forest landscapes, with an emphasis on soil fungi. We analyse 80 experiments to show that native soil microbiome restoration can accelerate plant biomass production by 64% on average, across ecosystems. Enormous potential also exists within managed landscapes, as agriculture and forestry are the dominant uses of land on Earth. Along with improving and stabilizing yields, enhancing microbial biodiversity in managed landscapes is a critical and underappreciated opportunity to build reservoirs, rather than deserts, of microbial life across our planet. As markets emerge to engineer the ecosystem microbiome, we can avert the mistakes of aboveground ecosystem management and avoid microbial monocultures of single high-performing microbial strains, which can exacerbate ecosystem vulnerability to pathogens and extreme events. Harnessing the planet's breadth of microbial life has the potential to transform ecosystem management, but it requires that we understand how to monitor and conserve the Earth's microbiome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36192539
doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01228-3
pii: 10.1038/s41564-022-01228-3
doi:
Substances chimiques
Soil
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1717-1725Informations de copyright
© 2022. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Mora, C., Tittensor, D. P., Adl, S., Simpson, A. G. B. & Worm, B. How many species are there on earth and in the ocean? PLoS Biol. 9, e1001127 (2011).
pubmed: 21886479
pmcid: 3160336
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127
Costello, M. J., May, R. M. & Stork, N. E. Can we name earth’s species before they go extinct? Science 339, 413–416 (2013).
pubmed: 23349283
doi: 10.1126/science.1230318
Corlett, R. T. Plant diversity in a changing world: status, trends, and conservation needs. Plant Divers. 38, 10–16 (2016).
pubmed: 30159445
pmcid: 6112092
doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2016.01.001
Baldrian, P., Větrovský, T., Lepinay, C. & Kohout, P. High-throughput sequencing view on the magnitude of global fungal diversity. Fungal Divers. 114, 539–547 (2022).
doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00472-y
Taylor, D. L. et al. A first comprehensive census of fungi in soil reveals both hyperdiversity and fine-scale niche partitioning. Ecol. Monogr. 84, 3–20 (2014).
doi: 10.1890/12-1693.1
Locey, K. J. & Lennon, J. T. Scaling laws predict global microbial diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5970–5975 (2016).
pubmed: 27140646
pmcid: 4889364
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521291113
Schopf, J. W. Disparate rates, differing fates: tempo and mode of evolution changed from the Precambrian to the Phanerozoic. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6735–6742 (1994).
pubmed: 8041691
pmcid: 44277
doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.6735
Seager, S., Huang, J., Petkowski, J. J. & Pajusalu, M. Laboratory studies on the viability of life in H2-dominated exoplanet atmospheres. Nat. Astron. 4, 802–806 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1069-4
Halme, P., Holec, J. & Heilmann-Clausen, J. The history and future of fungi as biodiversity surrogates in forests. Fungal Ecol. 27, 193–201 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2016.10.005
Arnolds, E. Decline of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Europe. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 35, 209–244 (1991).
doi: 10.1016/0167-8809(91)90052-Y
Boddy, L. in The Fungi (eds Watkinson, S. C. et al.) 361–400 (Elsevier, 2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-382034-1.00011-6
Zimmerman, M. The mushroom message. Sun 11A (1992).
Bader, P., Jansson, S. & Jonsson, B. G. Wood-inhabiting fungi and substratum decline in selectively logged boreal spruce forests. Biol. Conserv. 72, 355–362 (1995).
doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(94)00029-P
Weinbauer, M. G. & Rassoulzadegan, F. Extinction of microbes: evidence and potential consequences. Endanger. Species Res. 3, 205–215 (2007).
doi: 10.3354/esr003205
Chomicki, G., Kiers, E. T. & Renner, S. S. The evolution of mutualistic dependence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 51, 409–432 (2020).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110218-024629
Blaser, M. J. The theory of disappearing microbiota and the epidemics of chronic diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 461–463 (2017).
pubmed: 28749457
doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.77
Carthey, A. J., Blumstein, D. T., Gallagher, R. V., Tetu, S. G. & Gillings, M. R. Conserving the holobiont. Funct. Ecol. 34, 764–776 (2020).
doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13504
Schapheer, C., Pellens, R. & Scherson, R. Arthropod-microbiota integration: its importance for ecosystem conservation. Front. Microbiol. 12, 2094 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.702763
Zhou, Z., Wang, C. & Luo, Y. Meta-analysis of the impacts of global change factors on soil microbial diversity and functionality. Nat. Commun. 11, 3072 (2020).
pubmed: 32555185
pmcid: 7300008
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16881-7
Anthony, M. A., Stinson, K. A., Moore, J. A. M. & Frey, S. D. Plant invasion impacts on fungal community structure and function depend on soil warming and nitrogen enrichment. Oecologia 194, 659–672 (2020).
pubmed: 33141324
pmcid: 7683454
doi: 10.1007/s00442-020-04797-4
Lilleskov, E., Hobbie, E. A. & Horton, T. Conservation of ectomycorrhizal fungi: exploring the linkages between functional and taxonomic responses to anthropogenic N deposition. Fungal Ecol. 4, 174–183 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2010.09.008
Gibbons, S. M. et al. Invasive plants rapidly reshape soil properties in a grassland ecosystem. mSystems 2, e00178-16 (2017).
pubmed: 28289729
pmcid: 5340861
doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00178-16
Rillig, M. C. et al. The role of multiple global change factors in driving soil functions and microbial biodiversity. Science 366, 886–890 (2019).
pubmed: 31727838
pmcid: 6941939
doi: 10.1126/science.aay2832
Certini, G., Moya, D., Lucas-Borja, M. E. & Mastrolonardo, G. The impact of fire on soil-dwelling biota: a review. For. Ecol. Manage. 488, 118989 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.118989
Caruso, T., Hempel, S., Powell, J. R., Barto, E. K. & Rillig, M. C. Compositional divergence and convergence in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Ecology 93, 1115–1124 (2012).
pubmed: 22764497
doi: 10.1890/11-1030.1
Anthony, M., Frey, S. & Stinson, K. Fungal community homogenization, shift in dominant trophic guild, and appearance of novel taxa with biotic invasion. Ecosphere 8, e01951 (2017).
doi: 10.1002/ecs2.1951
Guerra, C. A. et al. Global projections of the soil microbiome in the Anthropocene. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 30, 987–999 (2021).
pubmed: 33867861
doi: 10.1111/geb.13273
Enright, D. J., Frangioso, K. M., Isobe, K., Rizzo, D. M. & Glassman, S. I. Mega‐fire in redwood tanoak forest reduces bacterial and fungal richness and selects for pyrophilous taxa that are phylogenetically conserved. Mol. Ecol. 31, 2475–2493 (2022).
pubmed: 35152495
doi: 10.1111/mec.16399
Anthony, M. A. et al. Forest tree growth is linked to mycorrhizal fungal composition and function across Europe. ISME J. 16, 1327–1336 (2022).
pubmed: 35001085
pmcid: 9038731
doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01159-7
Crowther, T. W. et al. The global soil community and its influence on biogeochemistry. Science 365, eaav0550 (2019).
pubmed: 31439761
doi: 10.1126/science.aav0550
Ceballos, G. et al. Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci. Adv. 1, e1400253 (2015).
pubmed: 26601195
pmcid: 4640606
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1400253
Novacek, M. J. & Cleland, E. E. The current biodiversity extinction event: scenarios for mitigation and recovery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5466–5470 (2001).
pubmed: 11344295
pmcid: 33235
doi: 10.1073/pnas.091093698
Guerra, C. A. et al. Tracking, targeting, and conserving soil biodiversity. Science 371, 239–241 (2021).
pubmed: 33446546
doi: 10.1126/science.abd7926
Guerra, C. A. et al. Blind spots in global soil biodiversity and ecosystem function research. Nat. Commun. 11, 3870 (2020).
pubmed: 32747621
pmcid: 7400591
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17688-2
Cameron, E. K. et al. Global mismatches in aboveground and belowground biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 33, 1187–1192 (2019).
pubmed: 30868645
doi: 10.1111/cobi.13311
Tedersoo, L. et al. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science 346, 1256688 (2014).
pubmed: 25430773
doi: 10.1126/science.1256688
Bahram, M. et al. Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome. Nature 560, 233–237 (2018).
pubmed: 30069051
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0386-6
Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil. Science 359, 320–325 (2018).
pubmed: 29348236
doi: 10.1126/science.aap9516
Peixoto, R. S. et al. Harnessing the microbiome to prevent global biodiversity loss. Nat. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01173-1 (2022).
Box, G. E. P. & Draper, N. R. Empirical Model-building and Response Surfaces (Wiley, 1987).
Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G. & Hunter, J. S. Statistics for Experimenters: an Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building (Wiley, 1978).
Kothamasi, D., Spurlock, M. & Kiers, E. T. Agricultural microbial resources: private property or global commons? Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 1091–1093 (2011).
pubmed: 22158360
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2056
Davison, J. et al. Global assessment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus diversity reveals very low endemism. Science 349, 970–973 (2015).
pubmed: 26315436
doi: 10.1126/science.aab1161
van der Linde, S. et al. Environment and host as large-scale controls of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Nature 558, 243–248 (2018).
pubmed: 29875410
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0189-9
Davison, J. et al. Temperature and pH define the realised niche space of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 231, 763–776 (2021).
pubmed: 33507570
doi: 10.1111/nph.17240
Ramirez, K. S. et al. Detecting macroecological patterns in bacterial communities across independent studies of global soils. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 189–196 (2018).
pubmed: 29158606
doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0062-x
Wild, S. Quest to map Africa’s soil microbiome begins. Nature 539, 152 (2016).
pubmed: 27830819
doi: 10.1038/539152a
Bissett, A. et al. Introducing BASE: the Biomes of Australian Soil Environments soil microbial diversity database. GigaScience 5, 21 (2016).
pubmed: 27195106
pmcid: 4870752
doi: 10.1186/s13742-016-0126-5
Pan, K., Guo, Z. & Liu, J. Building and materializing of China Soil Microbiome Data Platform. Acta Pedol. Sin. 56, 1023–1033 (2019).
Orgiazzi, A., Ballabio, C., Panagos, P., Jones, A. & Fernández‐Ugalde, O. LUCAS Soil, the largest expandable soil dataset for Europe: a review. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 69, 140–153 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/ejss.12499
Hinckley, E. S. et al. The soil and plant biogeochemistry sampling design for The National Ecological Observatory Network. Ecosphere 7, e01234 (2016).
doi: 10.1002/ecs2.1234
Větrovský, T. et al. GlobalFungi, a global database of fungal occurrences from high-throughput-sequencing metabarcoding studies. Sci. Data 7, 228 (2020).
pubmed: 32661237
pmcid: 7359306
doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0567-7
Jackson, F. Sustainable agriculture and a low carbon future: are we missing out on mycelium? Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/feliciajackson/2021/12/02/sustainable-agriculture-and-a-low-carbon-future-are-we-missing-out-on-mycelium/?sh=3dc1a6d076ed (2021).
Gilbert, J. A., Jansson, J. K. & Knight, R. The Earth Microbiome project: successes and aspirations. BMC Biol. 12, 69 (2014).
pubmed: 25184604
pmcid: 4141107
doi: 10.1186/s12915-014-0069-1
Fedrowitz, K. et al. Can retention forestry help conserve biodiversity? A meta‐analysis. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 1669–1679 (2014).
pubmed: 25552747
pmcid: 4277688
doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12289
Schmidt, R., Mitchell, J. & Scow, K. Cover cropping and no-till increase diversity and symbiotroph:saprotroph ratios of soil fungal communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 129, 99–109 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.11.010
Status of the World’s Soil Resources: Main Report (FAO, 2015).
Aronson, J., Goodwin, N., Orlando, L., Eisenberg, C. & Cross, A. T. A world of possibilities: six restoration strategies to support the United Nation’s Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Restor. Ecol. 28, 730–736 (2020).
doi: 10.1111/rec.13170
Seymour, F. Seeing the forests as well as the (trillion) trees in corporate climate strategies. One Earth 2, 390–393 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.05.006
Dinerstein, E. et al. A global deal for nature: guiding principles, milestones, and targets. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw2869 (2019).
pubmed: 31016243
pmcid: 6474764
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw2869
Philipson, C. D. et al. Active restoration accelerates the carbon recovery of human-modified tropical forests. Science 369, 838–841 (2020).
pubmed: 32792397
doi: 10.1126/science.aay4490
Coleman, E. A. et al. Limited effects of tree planting on forest canopy cover and rural livelihoods in Northern India. Nat. Sustain. 4, 997–1004 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41893-021-00761-z
Neuenkamp, L., Prober, S. M., Price, J. N., Zobel, M. & Standish, R. J. Benefits of mycorrhizal inoculation to ecological restoration depend on plant functional type, restoration context and time. Fungal Ecol. 40, 140–149 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2018.05.004
Koziol, L. et al. Manipulating plant microbiomes in the field: native mycorrhizae advance plant succession and improve native plant restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14036 (2021).
Wubs, E. R. J., van der Putten, W. H., Bosch, M. & Bezemer, T. M. Soil inoculation steers restoration of terrestrial ecosystems. Nat. Plants 2, 16107 (2016).
pubmed: 27398907
doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.107
Bever, J. & Schultz, P. Prairie mycorrhizal fungi inoculant may increase native plant diversity on restored sites (Illinois). Ecol. Restor. 21, 311–312 (2003).
Vahter, T. et al. Co-introduction of native mycorrhizal fungi and plant seeds accelerates restoration of post-mining landscapes. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 1741–1751 (2020).
doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13663
Egan, C. P. et al. Restoration of the mycobiome of the endangered Hawaiian mint Phyllostegia kaalaensis increases its resistance to a common powdery mildew. Fungal Ecol. 52, 101070 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2021.101070
Wubs, E. R. J. et al. Single introductions of soil biota and plants generate long‐term legacies in soil and plant community assembly. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1145–1151 (2019).
pubmed: 31020756
pmcid: 6850328
doi: 10.1111/ele.13271
Abrego, N. et al. Reintroduction of threatened fungal species via inoculation. Biol. Conserv. 203, 120–124 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.014
Salomon, M. J. et al. Global evaluation of commercial arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculants under greenhouse and field conditions. Appl. Soil Ecol. 169, 104225 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104225
Maltz, M. R. & Treseder, K. K. Sources of inocula influence mycorrhizal colonization of plants in restoration projects: a meta-analysis: mycorrhizal inoculation in restoration. Restor. Ecol. 23, 625–634 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/rec.12231
Busby, P. E., Newcombe, G., Neat, A. S. & Averill, C. Facilitating reforestation through the plant microbiome: perspectives from the phyllosphere. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-021320-010717 (2022).
van der Heijden, M. G. A., Martin, F. M., Selosse, M.-A. & Sanders, I. R. Mycorrhizal ecology and evolution: the past, the present, and the future. New Phytol. 205, 1406–1423 (2015).
pubmed: 25639293
doi: 10.1111/nph.13288
Crowther, T. W. et al. Predicting the responsiveness of soil biodiversity to deforestation: a cross-biome study. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2983–2994 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.12565
Lilleskov, E. A., Kuyper, T. W., Bidartondo, M. I. & Hobbie, E. A. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition impacts on the structure and function of forest mycorrhizal communities: a review. Environ. Pollut. 246, 148–162 (2019).
pubmed: 30543941
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.074
Smith, G. R., Steidinger, B. S., Bruns, T. D. & Peay, K. G. Competition–colonization tradeoffs structure fungal diversity. ISME J. 12, 1758–1767 (2018).
pubmed: 29491493
pmcid: 6018791
doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0086-0
Ceballos, I. et al. The in vitro mass-produced model mycorrhizal fungus, Rhizophagus irregularis, significantly increases yields of the globally important food security crop cassava. PLoS ONE 8, e70633 (2013).
pubmed: 23950975
pmcid: 3737348
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070633
Buysens, C., César, V., Ferrais, F., de Boulois, H. D. & Declerck, S. Inoculation of Medicago sativa cover crop with Rhizophagus irregularis and Trichoderma harzianum increases the yield of subsequently-grown potato under low nutrient conditions. Appl. Soil Ecol. 105, 137–143 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.04.011
Antunes, P. M. et al. Influence of commercial inoculation with Glomus intraradices on the structure and functioning of an AM fungal community from an agricultural site. Plant Soil 317, 257–266 (2009).
doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9806-y
Emam, T. Local soil, but not commercial AMF inoculum, increases native and non‐native grass growth at a mine restoration site. Restor. Ecol. 24, 35–44 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/rec.12287
Hoeksema, J. D. et al. A meta-analysis of context-dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi. Ecol. Lett. 13, 394–407 (2010).
pubmed: 20100237
doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01430.x
Policelli, N., Horton, T. R., Hudon, A. T., Patterson, T. R. & Bhatnagar, J. M. Back to roots: the role of ectomycorrhizal fungi in boreal and temperate forest restoration. Front. For. Glob. Change 3, 97 (2020).
doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2020.00097
Hoeksema, J. D. et al. Ectomycorrhizal plant-fungal co-invasions as natural experiments for connecting plant and fungal traits to their ecosystem consequences. Front. Glob. Change 3, 84 (2020).
doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2020.00084
Land Use Statistics and Indicators. Global, Regional and Country Trends 1990– 2019 FAOSTAT Analytical Brief Series No. 28 (FAO, 2021).
Stewart, W. M., Dibb, D. W., Johnston, A. E. & Smyth, T. J. The contribution of commercial fertilizer nutrients to food production. Agron. J. 97, 1–6 (2005).
doi: 10.2134/agronj2005.0001
Harlander, S. K. The evolution of modern agriculture and its future with biotechnology. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 21, 161S–165S (2002).
pubmed: 12071299
doi: 10.1080/07315724.2002.10719260
Cooper, J. & Dobson, H. The benefits of pesticides to mankind and the environment. Crop Prot. 26, 1337–1348 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2007.03.022
Zsögön, A., Peres, L. E. P., Xiao, Y., Yan, J. & Fernie, A. R. Enhancing crop diversity for food security in the face of climate uncertainty. Plant J. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15626 (2021).
IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
McDonald, B. A. & Stukenbrock, E. H. Rapid emergence of pathogens in agro-ecosystems: global threats to agricultural sustainability and food security. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 371, 20160026 (2016).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0026
Avelino, J. et al. The coffee rust crises in Colombia and Central America (2008–2013): impacts, plausible causes and proposed solutions. Food Sec. 7, 303–321 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s12571-015-0446-9
Goss, E. M. et al. The Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans originated in central Mexico rather than the Andes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8791–8796 (2014).
pubmed: 24889615
pmcid: 4066499
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401884111
Ploetz, R. C. Panama disease: a classic and destructive disease of banana. Plant Health Prog. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHP-2000-1204-01-HM (2000).
Craven, D. et al. Multiple facets of biodiversity drive the diversity–stability relationship. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1579–1587 (2018).
pubmed: 30150740
doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0647-7
Thibaut, L. M. & Connolly, S. R. Understanding diversity–stability relationships: towards a unified model of portfolio effects. Ecol. Lett. 16, 140–150 (2013).
pubmed: 23095077
doi: 10.1111/ele.12019
Isbell, F. et al. Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes. Nature 526, 574–577 (2015).
pubmed: 26466564
doi: 10.1038/nature15374
Prieto, I. et al. Complementary effects of species and genetic diversity on productivity and stability of sown grasslands. Nat. Plants 1, 15033 (2015).
pubmed: 27247033
doi: 10.1038/nplants.2015.33
Liang, J. et al. Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests. Science 354, aaf8957 (2016).
pubmed: 27738143
doi: 10.1126/science.aaf8957
Cornell, C. et al. Do bioinoculants affect resident microbial communities? A meta-analysis. Front. Agron. 3, 753474 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fagro.2021.753474
Manning, L. Groundwork BioAg raises $11m to expand mycorrhizal inputs business. AgFunder Network https://agfundernews.com/groundwork-bioag-raises-11m-to-expand-mycorrhizal-inputs-business (2021).
Egidi, E. et al. A few Ascomycota taxa dominate soil fungal communities worldwide. Nat. Commun. 10, 2369 (2019).
pubmed: 31147554
pmcid: 6542806
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10373-z
Olle, M. & Williams, I. H. Effective microorganisms and their influence on vegetable production—a review. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 88, 380–386 (2013).
doi: 10.1080/14620316.2013.11512979
Mayer, J., Scheid, S., Widmer, F., Fließbach, A. & Oberholzer, H.-R. How effective are ‘Effective microorganisms® (EM)’? Results from a field study in temperate climate. Appl. Soil Ecol. 46, 230–239 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.08.007
Kodippili, K. P. A. N. & Nimalan, J. Effect of homemade effective microorganisms on the growth and yield of chilli (Capsicum annuum) MI-2. AGRIEAST J. Agric. Sci. https://doi.org/10.4038/agrieast.v12i2.57 (2018).
de Araujo Avila, G. M., Gabardo, G., Clock, D. C. & de Lima Junior, O. S. Use of efficient microorganisms in agriculture. Res. Soc. Dev. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17515 (2021).
Saleem, M., Hu, J. & Jousset, A. More than the sum of its parts: microbiome biodiversity as a driver of plant growth and soil health. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 50, 145–168 (2019).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062605
Bradford, M. A. et al. Thermal adaptation of soil microbial respiration to elevated temperature. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1316–1327 (2008).
pubmed: 19046360
doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01251.x
Romero-Olivares, A. L., Allison, S. D. & Treseder, K. K. Soil microbes and their response to experimental warming over time: a meta-analysis of field studies. Soil Biol. Biochem. 107, 32–40 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.12.026
Klironomos, J. N. Variation in plant response to native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 84, 2292–2301 (2003).
doi: 10.1890/02-0413
Veen, C. G. F., Snoek, B. L., Bakx-Schotman, T., Wardle, D. A. & van der Putten, W. H. Relationships between fungal community composition in decomposing leaf litter and home-field advantage effects. Funct. Ecol. 33, 1524–1535 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13351
Wang, Q., Zhong, M. & He, T. Home-field advantage of litter decomposition and nitrogen release in forest ecosystems. Biol. Fertil. Soils 49, 427–434 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s00374-012-0741-y
Hawkes, C. V., Waring, B. G., Rocca, J. D. & Kivlin, S. N. Historical climate controls soil respiration responses to current soil moisture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6322–6327 (2017).
pubmed: 28559315
pmcid: 5474806
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620811114
Morriën, E. et al. Soil networks become more connected and take up more carbon as nature restoration progresses. Nat. Commun. 8, 14349 (2017).
pubmed: 28176768
pmcid: 5309817
doi: 10.1038/ncomms14349
Wagg, C., Bender, S. F., Widmer, F. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5266–5270 (2014).
pubmed: 24639507
pmcid: 3986181
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320054111
Wittebolle, L. et al. Initial community evenness favours functionality under selective stress. Nature 458, 623–626 (2009).
pubmed: 19270679
doi: 10.1038/nature07840
de Graaff, M.-A., Adkins, J., Kardol, P. & Throop, H. A meta-analysis of soil biodiversity impacts on the carbon cycle. Soil 1, 257–271 (2015).
doi: 10.5194/soil-1-257-2015
Gao, J. et al. Assessing the effect of leaf litter diversity on the decomposition and associated diversity of fungal assemblages. Forests 6, 2371–2386 (2015).
doi: 10.3390/f6072371
Selosse, M.-A., Bouchard, D., Martin, F. & Tacon, F. L. Effect of Laccaria bicolor strains inoculated on Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) several years after nursery inoculation. Can. J. Res. 30, 360–371 (2000).
doi: 10.1139/x99-221
Banerjee, S. et al. Agricultural intensification reduces microbial network complexity and the abundance of keystone taxa in roots. ISME J. 13, 1722–1736 (2019).
pubmed: 30850707
pmcid: 6591126
doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0383-2