The


Journal

eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 10 2022
Historique:
received: 06 05 2022
accepted: 11 08 2022
entrez: 4 10 2022
pubmed: 5 10 2022
medline: 6 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

RNA interference systems depend on the synthesis of small RNA precursors whose sequences define the target spectrum of these silencing pathways. The The genes within our DNA encode the essentials of our body plan and how each task in the body is achieved. However, our genome also contains many repetitive regions of DNA that do not encode functional genes. Some of these regions are genetic parasites known as transposons that try to multiply and spread around the DNA of their host. To prevent transposon DNA from interfering with the way the body operates, humans and other animals have evolved elaborate defense mechanisms to identify transposons and prevent them from multiplying. In one such mechanism, known as the piRNA pathway, the host makes small molecules known as piRNAs that have sequences complementary to those of transposons, and act as guides to silence the transposons. The instructions to make these piRNAs are stored in the form of transposon fragments in dedicated regions of host DNA called piRNA clusters. These clusters thereby act as genetic memory, allowing the host to recognize and silence specific transposons in other locations within the host’s genome. In fruit flies, a protein called Rhino binds to piRNA clusters that are densely packed to allow piRNAs to be made. However, it remained unclear how Rhino is able to identify and bind to piRNA clusters, but not to other similarly densely packed regions of DNA. Baumgartner et al. used a combination of genetic, genomic, and imaging approaches to study how Rhino finds its way in the fruit fly genome. They found that another protein called Kipferl interacts with Rhino and is required for Rhino to bind to nearly all piRNA clusters. Since Kipferl can by itself bind to the sequences that Rhino needs to find, the results suggest that Kipferl acts to recruit and initiate Rhino binding within densely packed piRNA clusters. Further experiments found that, in flies lacking Kipferl, Rhino binds to regions of DNA called Satellite repeats, hinting that these selfish sequences may compete for Rhino for their own benefit. The finding that Kipferl and Rhino work together to define the memory system of the piRNA pathway strongly advances our understanding of how a sequence-specific defense system based on small RNAs can be established.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
The genes within our DNA encode the essentials of our body plan and how each task in the body is achieved. However, our genome also contains many repetitive regions of DNA that do not encode functional genes. Some of these regions are genetic parasites known as transposons that try to multiply and spread around the DNA of their host. To prevent transposon DNA from interfering with the way the body operates, humans and other animals have evolved elaborate defense mechanisms to identify transposons and prevent them from multiplying. In one such mechanism, known as the piRNA pathway, the host makes small molecules known as piRNAs that have sequences complementary to those of transposons, and act as guides to silence the transposons. The instructions to make these piRNAs are stored in the form of transposon fragments in dedicated regions of host DNA called piRNA clusters. These clusters thereby act as genetic memory, allowing the host to recognize and silence specific transposons in other locations within the host’s genome. In fruit flies, a protein called Rhino binds to piRNA clusters that are densely packed to allow piRNAs to be made. However, it remained unclear how Rhino is able to identify and bind to piRNA clusters, but not to other similarly densely packed regions of DNA. Baumgartner et al. used a combination of genetic, genomic, and imaging approaches to study how Rhino finds its way in the fruit fly genome. They found that another protein called Kipferl interacts with Rhino and is required for Rhino to bind to nearly all piRNA clusters. Since Kipferl can by itself bind to the sequences that Rhino needs to find, the results suggest that Kipferl acts to recruit and initiate Rhino binding within densely packed piRNA clusters. Further experiments found that, in flies lacking Kipferl, Rhino binds to regions of DNA called Satellite repeats, hinting that these selfish sequences may compete for Rhino for their own benefit. The finding that Kipferl and Rhino work together to define the memory system of the piRNA pathway strongly advances our understanding of how a sequence-specific defense system based on small RNAs can be established.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36193674
doi: 10.7554/eLife.80067
pii: 80067
pmc: PMC9531945
doi:
pii:

Substances chimiques

Chromatin 0
Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone 0
DNA Transposable Elements 0
Drosophila Proteins 0
RNA Precursors 0
RNA, Small Interfering 0
Guanosine 12133JR80S

Banques de données

GEO
['GSE202468']

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2022, Baumgartner et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

LB, DH, SP, CY, PD, JB No competing interests declared

Références

Genetics. 2004 Apr;166(4):1775-82
pubmed: 15126397
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jan 8;49(D1):D899-D907
pubmed: 33219682
J Proteome Res. 2019 Jan 4;18(1):535-541
pubmed: 30351950
PLoS Biol. 2009 Oct;7(10):e1000234
pubmed: 19859525
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jul 2;47(W1):W5-W10
pubmed: 31062021
Genes Dev. 2016 Apr 1;30(7):840-55
pubmed: 27036967
Methods Enzymol. 1995;255:331-42
pubmed: 8524119
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 22;111(29):E2967-76
pubmed: 25002478
Nat Commun. 2021 Jul 7;12(1):4170
pubmed: 34234130
Genetics. 2012 Sep;192(1):33-53
pubmed: 22964836
Cell. 2014 Jun 5;157(6):1364-1379
pubmed: 24906153
EMBO J. 2004 Feb 11;23(3):489-99
pubmed: 14765118
Silence. 2012 Dec 28;3(1):9
pubmed: 23273270
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jul 8;44(W1):W160-5
pubmed: 27079975
Genetics. 2007 Jun;176(2):1343-9
pubmed: 17409066
Mol Cell. 2008 Sep 26;31(6):785-99
pubmed: 18922463
Nature. 2018 May;557(7707):739-743
pubmed: 29795351
Genetics. 2018 Jun;209(2):381-387
pubmed: 29669732
Mol Cell. 2016 Jul 7;63(1):97-109
pubmed: 27292797
Annu Rev Genet. 2018 Nov 23;52:131-157
pubmed: 30476449
G3 (Bethesda). 2014 Oct 15;4(12):2409-18
pubmed: 25324299
Mol Cell. 2017 May 4;66(3):411-419.e4
pubmed: 28457744
Cell. 1988 Jul 15;54(2):179-89
pubmed: 2839299
Genome Res. 2015 Jan;25(1):89-99
pubmed: 25342723
G3 (Bethesda). 2021 Jan 18;11(1):
pubmed: 33561227
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
Annu Rev Genet. 2019 Dec 3;53:393-416
pubmed: 31518518
Nat Methods. 2011 May;8(5):405-7
pubmed: 21460824
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(1):97-108
pubmed: 24097433
Genes (Basel). 2019 Mar 11;10(3):
pubmed: 30862119
Curr Protoc Protein Sci. 2018 Feb 21;91:19.23.1-19.23.15
pubmed: 29516480
Cell. 2007 Mar 23;128(6):1089-103
pubmed: 17346786
Nat Genet. 2008 Apr;40(4):476-83
pubmed: 18311141
PLoS Genet. 2005 Jul;1(1):96-108
pubmed: 16103923
PLoS Genet. 2014 Feb 06;10(2):e1004138
pubmed: 24516406
Cell. 2012 Nov 9;151(4):871-884
pubmed: 23141543
Nature. 2009 Oct 29;461(7268):1296-9
pubmed: 19812547
PLoS Genet. 2021 Sep 2;17(9):e1009591
pubmed: 34473737
Genes Dev. 2014 Aug 1;28(15):1667-80
pubmed: 25085419
Genes Dev. 2008 Nov 1;22(21):3007-23
pubmed: 18981478
Cell Res. 2015 Apr;25(4):525-8
pubmed: 25613572
Nat Rev Genet. 2019 Feb;20(2):89-108
pubmed: 30446728
Methods Mol Biol. 2004;261:247-62
pubmed: 15064463
Mol Gen Genet. 2000 Nov;264(4):371-7
pubmed: 11129040
Trends Genet. 2010 Dec;26(12):499-509
pubmed: 20934772
Genome Biol. 2008;9(9):R137
pubmed: 18798982
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011 Apr;12(4):246-58
pubmed: 21427766
Mol Cell. 2010 May 28;38(4):576-89
pubmed: 20513432
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Aug 20;48(14):e79
pubmed: 32496553
Structure. 2003 Nov;11(11):1393-402
pubmed: 14604529
Science. 2015 May 15;348(6236):817-21
pubmed: 25977554
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Feb 26;49(4):2375-2389
pubmed: 33638995
Genome Res. 2015 Mar;25(3):445-58
pubmed: 25589440
RNA. 2017 Oct;23(10):1582-1591
pubmed: 28698239
EMBO Rep. 2014 Apr;15(4):411-8
pubmed: 24562610
Cell. 2019 Aug 8;178(4):964-979.e20
pubmed: 31398345
Biotechniques. 1993 Jun;14(6):920-4
pubmed: 8333960
Elife. 2021 Jul 13;10:
pubmed: 34259629
Nature. 2017 Sep 7;549(7670):54-59
pubmed: 28847004
Cell. 2007 Apr 6;129(1):69-82
pubmed: 17418787
Mol Cell. 2021 Oct 7;81(19):3965-3978.e5
pubmed: 34352205
Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2020 Jan;1863(1):194446
pubmed: 31706027
Nat Protoc. 2006;1(2):729-48
pubmed: 17406303
Annu Rev Genet. 2009;43:467-92
pubmed: 19919324
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Sep;24(9):1934-43
pubmed: 17569752
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 31;103(44):16325-30
pubmed: 17056713
Cell. 2014 Jun 5;157(6):1353-1363
pubmed: 24906152
RNA. 2018 Apr;24(4):574-584
pubmed: 29358235
Epigenetics Chromatin. 2021 Mar 22;14(1):16
pubmed: 33752739
Elife. 2020 Nov 10;9:
pubmed: 33169670
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Oct;36(9):880-887
pubmed: 30125270
Genetics. 2000 Aug;155(4):1831-9
pubmed: 10924478
EMBO Rep. 2018 Jul;19(7):
pubmed: 29858487
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 6;11(1):5628
pubmed: 33159074
Science. 2015 May 15;348(6236):812-817
pubmed: 25977553
EMBO Rep. 2002 Dec;3(12):1158-62
pubmed: 12446571
Nat Genet. 1997 Jul;16(3):277-82
pubmed: 9207794
Genes Dev. 2019 Sep 1;33(17-18):1208-1220
pubmed: 31416967
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2019 Aug;26(8):720-731
pubmed: 31384064
Cell. 2009 Sep 18;138(6):1137-49
pubmed: 19732946
Genet Res Int. 2012;2012:430136
pubmed: 22567387
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jul;42(Web Server issue):W320-4
pubmed: 24753421
Cell Rep. 2018 Sep 25;24(13):3413-3422.e4
pubmed: 30257203

Auteurs

Lisa Baumgartner (L)

Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.
Vienna BioCenter PhD Program, Doctoral School of the University of Vienna and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Dominik Handler (D)

Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.

Sebastian Wolfgang Platzer (SW)

Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.

Changwei Yu (C)

Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.

Peter Duchek (P)

Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.

Julius Brennecke (J)

Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH