Different skeletal protein toolkits achieve similar structure and performance in the tropical coral Stylophora pistillata and the temperate Oculina patagonica.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 10 2022
04 10 2022
Historique:
received:
12
05
2022
accepted:
19
09
2022
entrez:
4
10
2022
pubmed:
5
10
2022
medline:
7
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Stony corals (order: Scleractinia) differ in growth form and structure. While stony corals have gained the ability to form their aragonite skeleton once in their evolution, the suite of proteins involved in skeletogenesis is different for different coral species. This led to the conclusion that the organic portion of their skeleton can undergo rapid evolutionary changes by independently evolving new biomineralization-related proteins. Here, we used liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to sequence skeletogenic proteins extracted from the encrusting temperate coral Oculina patagonica. We compare it to the previously published skeletal proteome of the branching subtropical corals Stylophora pistillata as both are regarded as highly resilient to environmental changes. We further characterized the skeletal organic matrix (OM) composition of both taxa and tested their effects on the mineral formation using a series of overgrowth experiments on calcite seeds. We found that each species utilizes a different set of proteins containing different amino acid compositions and achieve a different morphology modification capacity on calcite overgrowth. Our results further support the hypothesis that the different coral taxa utilize a species-specific protein set comprised of independent gene co-option to construct their own unique organic matrix framework. While the protein set differs between species, the specific predicted roles of the whole set appear to underline similar functional roles. They include assisting in forming the extracellular matrix, nucleation of the mineral and cell signaling. Nevertheless, the different composition might be the reason for the varying organization of the mineral growth in the presence of a particular skeletal OM, ultimately forming their distinct morphologies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36195656
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20744-0
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-20744-0
pmc: PMC9532382
doi:
Substances chimiques
Amino Acids
0
Minerals
0
Proteome
0
Calcium Carbonate
H0G9379FGK
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
16575Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Science. 1970 Dec 18;170(3964):1305-8
pubmed: 17829430
Biosystems. 1980;12(1-2):27-41
pubmed: 6991017
ACS Nano. 2017 Jul 25;11(7):6612-6622
pubmed: 28564539
Bioinformatics. 2014 May 1;30(9):1236-40
pubmed: 24451626
PLoS One. 2010 Jul 08;5(7):e11490
pubmed: 20628613
Cell Rep. 2017 Jan 17;18(3):762-776
pubmed: 28099853
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Sep;30(9):2099-112
pubmed: 23765379
J Proteome Res. 2018 Sep 7;17(9):2917-2924
pubmed: 30114372
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Jan;26(1):31-53
pubmed: 31696576
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D138-41
pubmed: 14681378
Nat Commun. 2021 Jul 21;12(1):4438
pubmed: 34290238
Acta Biomater. 2021 Jan 15;120:263-276
pubmed: 31954936
J Struct Biol. 2020 Feb 1;209(2):107431
pubmed: 31811894
BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Jul 29;9:178
pubmed: 19638240
Mar Pollut Bull. 2009 Oct;58(10):1428-36
pubmed: 19782832
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020 Oct;95(5):1372-1392
pubmed: 32447836
Matrix Biol. 2016 May-Jul;52-54:43-59
pubmed: 26807759
BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Oct 28;11:316
pubmed: 22034946
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 02;11(6):e0156424
pubmed: 27253604
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26411
pubmed: 22065994
Nat Genet. 2000 May;25(1):25-9
pubmed: 10802651
Front Genet. 2021 Feb 02;12:618517
pubmed: 33633782
PeerJ. 2019 Jul 15;7:e7241
pubmed: 31341732
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Mar 5;110(10):3788-93
pubmed: 23431140
Chem Sci. 2018 Nov 9;10(4):1176-1185
pubmed: 30774916
Acta Biomater. 2021 Jan 15;120:277-292
pubmed: 32590171
Syst Biol. 2021 Jun 16;70(4):635-647
pubmed: 33507310
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21800
pubmed: 21789182
J Struct Biol. 2021 Dec;213(4):107782
pubmed: 34455069
Curr Biol. 2013 Jun 17;23(12):1126-31
pubmed: 23746634
Proteomics. 2019 Aug;19(16):e1900036
pubmed: 31219243
Mol Biol Evol. 2021 Aug 23;38(9):3543-3555
pubmed: 33871620
Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 04;5:10803
pubmed: 26042834
J Biol Chem. 2008 Sep 12;283(37):25475-25484
pubmed: 18617510
Genome Biol. 2019 Nov 14;20(1):238
pubmed: 31727128
J Proteomics. 2021 Apr 30;238:104171
pubmed: 33652138
Protein Sci. 2021 Oct;30(10):2069-2082
pubmed: 34272906
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 2;111(35):12728-33
pubmed: 25139990
BMC Evol Biol. 2015 May 05;15:79
pubmed: 25940207
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008 Aug;83(3):315-37
pubmed: 18979594
Bioinformatics. 2012 Dec 15;28(24):3182-5
pubmed: 23060620
J R Soc Interface. 2021 Feb;18(175):20200859
pubmed: 33622149
BMC Mater. 2020 Jul 16;2:8
pubmed: 32724895
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 May;84(9):2732-6
pubmed: 16593827
Nat Commun. 2018 May 14;9(1):1880
pubmed: 29760444
Bioorg Med Chem. 2013 Mar 15;21(6):1437-50
pubmed: 23199478
Genome Biol. 2015 Aug 06;16:157
pubmed: 26243257
J Struct Biol. 2005 Jun;150(3):319-31
pubmed: 15890280
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015 Oct;46:17-26
pubmed: 26344100