Spatial transcriptomics tools allow for regional exploration of heterogeneous muscle pathology in the pre-clinical rabbit model of rotator cuff tear.
RNA-sequencing
Rotator cuff
Spatial transcriptomics
Visium
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Oct 2022
04 Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
28
06
2022
accepted:
18
09
2022
entrez:
4
10
2022
pubmed:
5
10
2022
medline:
7
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Conditions affecting skeletal muscle, such as chronic rotator cuff tears, low back pain, dystrophies, and many others, often share changes in muscle phenotype: intramuscular adipose and fibrotic tissue increase while contractile tissue is lost. The underlying changes in cell populations and cell ratios observed with these phenotypic changes complicate the interpretation of tissue-level transcriptional data. Novel single-cell transcriptomics has limited capacity to address this problem because muscle fibers are too long to be engulfed in single-cell droplets and single nuclei transcriptomics are complicated by muscle fibers' multinucleation. Therefore, the goal of this project was to evaluate the potential and challenges of a spatial transcriptomics technology to add dimensionality to transcriptional data in an attempt to better understand regional cellular activity in heterogeneous skeletal muscle tissue. The 3' Visium spatial transcriptomics technology was applied to muscle tissue of a rabbit model of rotator cuff tear. Healthy control and tissue collected at 2 and 16 weeks after tenotomy was utilized and freshly snap frozen tissue was compared with tissue stored for over 6 years to evaluate whether this technology is retrospectively useful in previously acquired tissues. Transcriptional information was overlayed with standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains of the exact same histological sections. Sequencing saturation and number of genes detected was not affected by sample storage duration. Unbiased clustering matched the underlying tissue type-based on H&E assessment. Connective-tissue-rich areas presented with lower unique molecular identifier counts are compared with muscle fibers even though tissue permeabilization was standardized across the section. A qualitative analysis of resulting datasets revealed heterogeneous fiber degeneration-regeneration after tenotomy based on (neonatal) myosin heavy chain 8 detection and associated differentially expressed gene analysis. This protocol can be used in skeletal muscle to explore spatial transcriptional patterns and confidently relate them to the underlying histology, even for tissues that have been stored for up to 6 years. Using this protocol, there is potential for novel transcriptional pathway discovery in longitudinal studies since the transcriptional information is unbiased by muscle composition and cell type changes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Conditions affecting skeletal muscle, such as chronic rotator cuff tears, low back pain, dystrophies, and many others, often share changes in muscle phenotype: intramuscular adipose and fibrotic tissue increase while contractile tissue is lost. The underlying changes in cell populations and cell ratios observed with these phenotypic changes complicate the interpretation of tissue-level transcriptional data. Novel single-cell transcriptomics has limited capacity to address this problem because muscle fibers are too long to be engulfed in single-cell droplets and single nuclei transcriptomics are complicated by muscle fibers' multinucleation. Therefore, the goal of this project was to evaluate the potential and challenges of a spatial transcriptomics technology to add dimensionality to transcriptional data in an attempt to better understand regional cellular activity in heterogeneous skeletal muscle tissue.
METHODS
METHODS
The 3' Visium spatial transcriptomics technology was applied to muscle tissue of a rabbit model of rotator cuff tear. Healthy control and tissue collected at 2 and 16 weeks after tenotomy was utilized and freshly snap frozen tissue was compared with tissue stored for over 6 years to evaluate whether this technology is retrospectively useful in previously acquired tissues. Transcriptional information was overlayed with standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains of the exact same histological sections.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Sequencing saturation and number of genes detected was not affected by sample storage duration. Unbiased clustering matched the underlying tissue type-based on H&E assessment. Connective-tissue-rich areas presented with lower unique molecular identifier counts are compared with muscle fibers even though tissue permeabilization was standardized across the section. A qualitative analysis of resulting datasets revealed heterogeneous fiber degeneration-regeneration after tenotomy based on (neonatal) myosin heavy chain 8 detection and associated differentially expressed gene analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This protocol can be used in skeletal muscle to explore spatial transcriptional patterns and confidently relate them to the underlying histology, even for tissues that have been stored for up to 6 years. Using this protocol, there is potential for novel transcriptional pathway discovery in longitudinal studies since the transcriptional information is unbiased by muscle composition and cell type changes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36195913
doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03326-8
pii: 10.1186/s13018-022-03326-8
pmc: PMC9531386
doi:
Substances chimiques
Myosin Heavy Chains
EC 3.6.4.1
Eosine Yellowish-(YS)
TDQ283MPCW
Hematoxylin
YKM8PY2Z55
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
440Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Jul;134(7):985-90
pubmed: 24845686
JOR Spine. 2020 Apr 08;3(2):e1087
pubmed: 32613162
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Oct 15;31(22):E847-55
pubmed: 17047533
Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 11;11(1):6374
pubmed: 33311464
J Orthop Res. 2015 Mar;33(3):421-9
pubmed: 25410765
Nat Neurosci. 2021 Mar;24(3):425-436
pubmed: 33558695
Neuromuscul Disord. 2015 May;25(5):375-80
pubmed: 25701397
Commun Biol. 2021 Nov 12;4(1):1280
pubmed: 34773081
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jul;(304):78-83
pubmed: 8020238
Nat Rev Genet. 2021 Oct;22(10):627-644
pubmed: 34145435
Front Physiol. 2021 Aug 06;12:707116
pubmed: 34421646
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2017 Jan;165(Pt B):382-395
pubmed: 27523963
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 19;12(1):1771
pubmed: 33741943
Genome Res. 2021 Nov 23;:
pubmed: 34815310
Front Physiol. 2014 Oct 06;5:380
pubmed: 25339908
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 27;12(1):6079
pubmed: 34707124
Skelet Muscle. 2015 Jul 15;5:22
pubmed: 26180627
Nat Methods. 2022 May;19(5):534-546
pubmed: 35273392
J Orthop Res. 2017 Dec;35(12):2700-2706
pubmed: 28480978
Front Physiol. 2022 Mar 08;13:801829
pubmed: 35350696
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7871):211-220
pubmed: 34381231
J Orthop Res. 2022 May;40(5):1016-1025
pubmed: 34392563
Am J Sports Med. 2007 May;35(5):719-28
pubmed: 17337727
J Orthop. 2013 Feb 26;10(1):8-12
pubmed: 24403741
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0190439
pubmed: 29293645
Circ Res. 2021 Oct 15;129(9):e183-e200
pubmed: 34517723
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 May-Jun;10(3):199-203
pubmed: 11408898
Nat Biomed Eng. 2020 Aug;4(8):827-834
pubmed: 32572199
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Nov;(308):90-7
pubmed: 7955708
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Feb 15;45(4):E189-E195
pubmed: 31513095
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 Mar;77(2):296-8
pubmed: 7706351
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jan;77(1):10-5
pubmed: 7822341
J Cell Sci. 2021 Jul 15;134(14):
pubmed: 34297126
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Apr;467(4):1074-82
pubmed: 18972175
J Orthop Res. 2018 Jan;36(1):272-281
pubmed: 28574610
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Feb 1;99(3):190-199
pubmed: 28145949