Patient positioning during pediatric cardiothoracic computed tomography using a high-resilience pad system and pre-scan measurement of chest thickness.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 10 2022
05 10 2022
Historique:
received:
28
05
2022
accepted:
21
09
2022
entrez:
5
10
2022
pubmed:
6
10
2022
medline:
12
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patient positioning at the isocenter of the CT gantry is important for optimizing image quality and radiation dose, but accurate positioning is challenging in pediatric patients. We evaluated whether the high-resilience pad and pre-scan measurement of chest thickness allow accurate positioning in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease. Sixty-seven patients aged 7 years or younger who underwent cardiothoracic CT were enrolled. The ideal table height, defined as the position at which the scanner's and patient's isocenters coincided, was determined by radiographers either manually (manual group) or based on the pad's and chest's thickness (calculated group). The distance between the two isocenters and image quality were evaluated. The calculated group demonstrated smaller isocenter distance and standard deviation (distance: 0.2 ± 5.8 mm vs. - 8.3 ± 11.6 mm, p < 0.01; absolute value: 4.1 [1.9-8.0] mm vs. 12.3 [5.1-16.3] mm, p < 0.01), and higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and dose-normalized SNR (SNRD) in the descending aorta than the manual group (SNR: 39.8 [31.0-53.7] vs. 31.9 [28.9-36.6], p = 0.048, SNRD: 39.8 [31.0-53.7] vs. 31.9 [28.9-36.6], p = 0.04). The system allowed for more accurate positioning in pediatric cardiothoracic CT, yielding higher image quality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36198731
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21018-5
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-21018-5
pmc: PMC9534888
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
16618Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Med Phys. 2007 Jul;34(7):3093-101
pubmed: 17822016
Phys Med. 2012 Jul;28(3):191-9
pubmed: 21741870
Pediatr Radiol. 2013 Jun;43(6):673-84
pubmed: 23341090
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Jan-Feb;10(1):13-21
pubmed: 26524989
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):547-52
pubmed: 17242267
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jan;31(1):131-138
pubmed: 32749591
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jul;203(1):123-30
pubmed: 24951205
Eur Radiol. 2019 Apr;29(4):2079-2088
pubmed: 30306328
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Apr;7(4):438-40
pubmed: 24742899
Invest Radiol. 2018 Nov;53(11):641-646
pubmed: 29762259
Med Phys. 2017 Apr;44(4):1514-1524
pubmed: 28133763
Pediatr Radiol. 2006 Dec;36(12):1273-82
pubmed: 17036235
Med Phys. 2017 Nov;44(11):5697-5704
pubmed: 28817195
Med Phys. 2013 Jan;40(1):011911
pubmed: 23298102
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Feb;20(2):190-204
pubmed: 30672159
Radiology. 2004 Dec;233(3):649-57
pubmed: 15498896
J Formos Med Assoc. 2015 Nov;114(11):1061-8
pubmed: 25241602
Circulation. 2014 Jul 8;130(2):161-7
pubmed: 24914037
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013 Nov-Dec;7(6):361-6
pubmed: 24331931
Invest Radiol. 2020 Jan;55(1):8-19
pubmed: 31567618
Invest Radiol. 2015 Sep;50(9):629-44
pubmed: 26135019
Invest Radiol. 2017 Feb;52(2):81-86
pubmed: 27518213