Factors associated with postoperative urinary retention in patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation.
Journal
International journal of impotence research
ISSN: 1476-5489
Titre abrégé: Int J Impot Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007383
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Oct 2022
05 Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
27
06
2022
accepted:
16
09
2022
revised:
12
09
2022
entrez:
5
10
2022
pubmed:
6
10
2022
medline:
6
10
2022
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Placement of penile prosthesis had been well described in the outpatient setting, however, one barrier to same-day discharge is postoperative urinary retention (POUR). POUR remains a condition encountered during ambulatory surgical procedures and has yet to be characterized in patients undergoing penile prosthesis. We characterized POUR in a cohort of penile prosthesis recipients along with risk factors and management. Patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation from 2014 through 2020 without pre-existing retention were included. All patients underwent a void trial immediately following penile prosthesis in the post-anesthesia care unit. POUR was strictly defined as (1) any patient requiring catheter replacement after prosthesis, (2) a rising post-void residual, or (3) inability to void after 6 h regardless of whether a catheter was placed. Independent procedures, demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative risk factors for POUR were assessed. 317 men were included of whom 27.1% experienced POUR. Men experiencing POUR and those not in retention were essentially indistinguishable with respect to previously described risk factors for POUR. Only use of both α-blockers and 5-α-reductase inhibitors was significantly associated with a greater risk of POUR, a finding maintained on adjusted analysis (adjusted odds ratio 10.1, 95% confidence interval 2.1 to 49.8). POUR resolved without intervention in 3.5%, a single episode of clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) in 7.0% of patients, and repeated CIC or indwelling catheter placement with a successful delayed void trial in 88.4% of patients. Rate of prosthesis infection in patients who experienced POUR did not significantly differ from those who did not experience POUR (4.7% vs. 2.2% p = 0.26). Our findings suggest that POUR is experienced in as many as 1 in 4 men undergoing penile prosthesis placement, most of whom must be managed with indwelling catheterization or repeated CIC. Those with indicators of symptomatic prostate enlargement are at significantly greater risk of urinary retention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36198809
doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00622-z
pii: 10.1038/s41443-022-00622-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Shamloul R, Ghanem H. Erectile dysfunction. Lancet 2013;381:153–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60520-0 .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60520-0
pubmed: 23040455
Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Management of erectile impotence. Use Implant Inflatable Prosthes Urol. 1973;2:80–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(73)90224-0 .
doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(73)90224-0
Garber BB. Outpatient inflatable penile prosthesis insertion. Urology 1997;49:600–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00540-7 .
doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00540-7
pubmed: 9111632
Lubensky JD. Outpatient 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1991;145:1176–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38566-x .
doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38566-x
pubmed: 2033688
Mulhall JP, Bloom K. Comparison of in-patient and out-patient penile prosthesis surgery. Int J Impot Res. 2001;13:251–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900695 .
doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900695
pubmed: 11890510
Tong CMC, Lucas J, Shah A, Foote C, Simhan J. Novel multi-modal analgesia protocol significantly decreases opioid requirements in inflatable penile prosthesis patients. J Sex Med. 2018;15:1187–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.05.017 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.05.017
pubmed: 30017719
Baldini G, Bagry H, Aprikian A, Carli F. Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology 2009;110:1139–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819f7aea .
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819f7aea
pubmed: 19352147
Vollstedt A, Gross MS, Antonini G, Perito PE. The infrapubic surgical approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:620–7. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.07.14 .
doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.07.14
pubmed: 28904894
pmcid: 5583056
Gupta NK, Ring J, Trost L, Wilson SK, Kohler TS. The penoscrotal surgical approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:628–38. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.07.32 .
doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.07.32
pubmed: 28904895
pmcid: 5583046
Koch CA, Grinberg GG, Farley DR. Incidence and risk factors for urinary retention after endoscopic hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2006;191:381–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.10.042 .
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.10.042
pubmed: 16490551
Scott AJ, Mason SE, Langdon AJ, Patel B, Mayer E, Moorthy K, et al. Prospective risk factor analysis for the development of post-operative urinary retention following ambulatory general surgery. World J Surg. 2018;42:3874–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4697-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4697-4
pubmed: 29947990
pmcid: 6244976
Roadman D, Helm M, Goldblatt MI, Kastenmeier A, Kindel TL, Gould JC, et al. Postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. J Surg Res. 2018;231:309–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.052 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.052
pubmed: 30278946
Aiyer SN, Kumar A, Shetty AP, Kanna RM, Rajasekaran S. Factors influencing postoperative urinary retention following elective posterior lumbar spine surgery: a prospective study. Asian Spine J. 2018;12:1100–5. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.1100 .
doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.1100
pubmed: 30322244
pmcid: 6284120
McConnell JD, Roehrborn CG, Bautista OM, Andriole GL Jr, Dixon CM, Kusek JW, et al. The long-term effect of doxazosin, finasteride, and combination therapy on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia. N. Engl J Med. 2003;349:2387–98. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa030656 .
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030656
pubmed: 14681504
Mills JT, Rapp DE, Shaw NM, Hougen HY, Agard HE, Case RM Jr., et al. Effect of active versus passive void trials on time to patient discharge, urinary tract infection, and urinary retention: a randomized clinical trial. World J Urol. 2020;38:2247–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-03005-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03005-0
pubmed: 31732771
Makary J, Phan K, McClintock G, Doctor M, Habashy D, Heywood S, et al. Bladder infusion versus standard catheter removal for trial of void: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2021;39:1781–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03408-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03408-4
pubmed: 32797262
Madersbacher H, Cardozo L, Chapple C, Abrams P, Toozs-Hobson P, Young JS, et al. What are the causes and consequences of bladder overdistension? ICI-RS 2011. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31:317–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22224 .
doi: 10.1002/nau.22224
pubmed: 22419355
Mason SE, Scott AJ, Mayer E, Purkayastha S. Patient-related risk factors for urinary retention following ambulatory general surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2016;211:1126–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.04.021 .
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.04.021
pubmed: 26257154
Hassler KR, Saxena P, Baltazar-Ford KS Open Inguinal Hernia Repair. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL), 2022.
Blair AB, Dwarakanath A, Mehta A, Liang H, Hui X, Wyman C, et al. Postoperative urinary retention after inguinal hernia repair: a single institution experience. Hernia. 2017;21:895–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1661-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1661-4
pubmed: 28871414
pmcid: 6178811
Bojaxhi E, Lee J, Bowers S, Frank RD, Pak SH, Rosales A, et al. Paravertebral blocks reduce the risk of postoperative urinary retention in inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2018;22:871–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1792-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1792-2
pubmed: 29909567
Crain N, Tejirian T. Impact of intraoperative foley catheters on postoperative urinary retention after inguinal hernia surgery. Am Surg. 2019;85:1099–103.
doi: 10.1177/000313481908501005
Nordin P, Zetterstrom H, Gunnarsson U, Nilsson E. Local, regional, or general anaesthesia in groin hernia repair: multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2003;362:853–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14339-5 .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14339-5
pubmed: 13678971
Clancy C, Coffey JC, O’Riordain MG, Burke JP. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of prophylactic alpha-blockade for the prevention of urinary retention following primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2018;216:337–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.02.017 .
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.02.017
pubmed: 28341140
Dave CN, Khalaf A, Patel HD, Kohn TP, Burnett AL. Neurogenic bladder is an independent risk factor for complications associated with inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. Int J Impot Res. 2020;32:520–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-019-0210-3 .
doi: 10.1038/s41443-019-0210-3
pubmed: 31645755